John Boehner--House Speaker and ... Consensus Builder?

November 11, 2010 RSS Feed Print

The 2010 elections are (for the most part) now fodder for the history books. The large majority of votes have been counted and, by all accounts, Republicans made significant gains in the U.S. House, Senate, gubernatorial races, and state legislatures. President Obama admitted in a somewhat bizarre press conference last week that Democrats were "shellacked,” but failed to specifically connect his aggressive domestic agenda with voter discontent.

[See a slide show of new faces in the U.S. Senate.]

The Washington man of the moment is John Boehner, the all but certain next speaker of the House. Boehner gave a rousing, and at times, tearful, speech on election night. Boehner insisted the 112th House, under his leadership, would seek to repeal the recently enacted healthcare law as well as pursue an aggressive agenda rooted in conservative principles.

[See where Boehner gets his campaign money.]

Yet to simply take Boehner's fiery election night rhetoric at face value could be a misstep. His reputation on Capitol Hill is more that of a conservative dealmaker--at times wiling to negotiate with his Democratic counterparts for the betterment of the democracy. His style is quite different than Nancy Pelosi's slash-and-burn, take no prisoners approach to the speakership. In a recent New York Times profile piece, Boehner cited his preferred model for speaker as the legendary Nicholas Longworth, the long-time House speaker, also from Ohio, who was known as conservative, but also as a consensus builder. Boehner is not known as a political bomb thrower. He generally leaves the dirty work to his top deputy and all but certain next House majority leader, Eric Cantor. [See where Cantor gets his campaign money.]

Boehner certainly has the toughest of political and policy needles to thread in the coming two years. He's already suffered rebuke from the GOP for his professed willingness to compromise on the expiration of the Bush era tax cuts a few months back. More than likely, any outreach to President Obama or the Democratic members of his body will draw significant fire from the Republican base and be viewed as a treasonous act by conservatives. 

[Check out our editorial cartoons on the Democrats.]

One can’t help but reflect on the historical contrast to the Republican wave election of 1994. That year’s GOP takeover of Congress--rooted in the Contract with America--placed Bob Dole and Newt Gingrich at he helms of each of their legislative bodies. Granted, following the defeat, President Clinton significantly moderated his positions in order to regain the confidence of the American people (a tactic pundits and political operatives have yet to determine that Obama will employ). Yet, Dole as the Republican majority leader and Clinton, the embattled Democratic president, worked together to balance the budget, pass welfare reform, and chart a more centrist course for the nation. Both Dole and Clinton were livid with the now infamous government shutdown, recognizing that a malfunctioning Washington was simply not in the best interest of the citizenry or of either man's political ambition. Clinton and Dole worked together despite both men’s awareness that they would likely be facing off against each other for the presidency in less than two years.

Boehner harbors no presidential ambitions, and he has made it clear that he will generally pursue the conservative principles that handed him the speaker's gavel. Yet, the question remains, will he follow the Longworth/Dole model and work toward more centrist policies that conservatives can tout as a win and Democrats can at least hold their nose and support? Or will party leadership, who believe obstructionism to be the best path for the GOP in the next two years, hamstring Boehner? This latter tactic is a double-edged sword--placating angry Republicans and inciting the base, but increasing the likelihood that Obama can run against an obstructionist, Republican "do nothing" House in 2012.

Only time will tell.

Tags:
Bob Dole,
2010 election,
deficit and national debt,
Nancy Pelosi,
John Boehner,
healthcare reform,
Congress,
Eric Cantor,
democratic party,
Newt Gingrich,
healthcare,
Bill Clinton,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

You take the idea of government shutdown from reasonable to ridicules.

That shutdown CAUSED balance budget. Clinton fought CONTRACT WITH AMERICA when Newt and friends pushed it in election. Clinton fought it until twice government was shut down. He would not sign many balanced budgets. Maybe you think Clinton had a balanced budget before Newt…. NOPE.

Ships were not abounded by sailors. Nuclear silos were manned. Such theatrics !!! Utter nonsense…

Do expect determination. I hope for no shutdown. If necessary, then wish my blessing.

Bill Hedges of MO 3:31PM November 12, 2010

Yes, by ALL means, let's shutdown the federal government. We won't have to worry about the deficit ANYMORE because there won't be ANY money going OUT. Make sense to me. The RETIRED folks WON'T get their SS checks, federal workers can COLLECT unemployment compensation(SHUTDOWN - OUT OF WORK), Soldiers, Sailors, Marines, and Airmen/women won't get paid(NOW THAT WILL LEAVE A LOT OF MILITARY SAYING "W T F ",) etc etc. Get my drift. It was a BAD idea then(Gingrich lost the "speakership" because of it), and it is a BAD idea now !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But with the internet AND the SHUTDOWN we JUST might FINALLY get rid of the USPS. WHO NEEDS THE MAIL delivered these days anyway ???????????????????????

scoobydoo of MA 1:32PM November 12, 2010

Yes, let's shutdown the government. Why, because the right-wing wants to prove once again they have NO ideas on how to govern. They want to throw their hissy fit and temper tantrum to get their way.

As it has been proven, from Reagan, Bush I and Bush II, the Republicans can only make the deficit rise, go to war, and try to dismantle the middle class. It seems that is what Bill and The peeps want to do as well. Serfdom will do you and your families well.

Tree Hugger of CO 10:22AM November 12, 2010

Cameron Lynch

Cameron Lynch

Cameron Lynch is president the Lynch Group, a government relations, political consulting and government contracting firm. Formerly with the Bipartisan Policy Center, Lynch has worked for Sen. John McCain and former Sen. Bob Dole, among others. He teaches classes in political campaign strategy and historic Congressional agreements at the George Washington University Graduate School of Political Management.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement