Where Obama Went Wrong

August 5, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (9)

I recently finished re-reading Edmund Morris’s superb second volume of his Theodore Roosevelt trilogy. Perhaps what struck me the most was the eerily similar challenges faced by T.R. and President Obama during their first two years in office. An economic system ruled by monopolies teetering on the brink of collapse, populist unrest among the American citizenry and unique and dangerous foreign policy challenges greeted both men when they first stepped foot in the Oval Office. Unfortunately, thus far, Obama has pursued the course chartered by the other President Roosevelt that liberals so hoped he would embody.

Swept into office by one of the most bombastic elections in recent history, Obama represented the great hope of the liberal elite--FDR reincarnate sent to craft a new social order policed by an expanded Washington. Although some Democrats remain disappointed by inevitable concessions Obama made throughout the legislative processes, one would be hard pressed not to concede that his initial footprint tracks a broadly expanded role for the federal government. A bloated stimulus package, financial and automaker bailouts, sweeping healthcare legislation, and financial regulatory reform all bear the signature of New Deal policies that have fueled Tea Party activism and made the once invincible golden boy of American politics appear, frankly, vulnerable.

[See a slide show of 10 keys to an Obama comeback.]

But it didn’t have to be this way. Campaign Obama promised the American people “post partisan” politics that sought genuine consensus and an end to the party bickering in Washington. Perhaps he should have more closely studied the actions of the first President Roosevelt.

As Jay Cost theorized in his excellent piece yesterday, Obama’s glaring gaffe was initially approaching these initiatives from a liberal blueprint and moving to the center only when absolutely compulsory. Historic and meaningful legislation originates in the contrary fashion. Despite majorities in both houses of Congress, Obama should have first built from the center and then moved left as the situations merited. Doing so would have placated his base and alienated the Republicans by offering them at least an opportunity at input. It also wouldn’t have been a bad political strategy in that it would have demonstrated to moderates and Independents his intention to deliver on his campaign promise of post-partisanship.

Unlike Obama, T.R. (promising his now famous “Square Deal” for the American people) attempted face-to-face negotiations with J.P. Morgan and his Northern Securities Company. When Morgan wouldn’t cave, T.R. took him all the way to the Supreme Court, and won, earning him the nickname “the Trust buster.” When overseeing the negotiations of the anthracite coal labor strike that threatened the shutdown of nothing less than the whole of American commerce, T.R. summoned railroad executives and labor leaders for a series of face to face negotiations and famously told them to “work it out.” They did. Maligned by many (including some within his own party), T.R. sent an armed U.S. Navy to support a free and independent Panama against Columbian rule. Military action ultimately proved unnecessary, but historians credit T.R.’s willingness to use force with the successful revolution and, ultimately, the construction of the Panama Canal.

T.R. has fallen out of favor with modern conservatives lately, who now view him as too soft on business, too environmentally friendly (60 years before that term was even coined) and ultimately, a turncoat to the Republican Party when he sought a third term as president from his progressive platform.

To this point, the same criticism certainly cannot be leveled against President Obama, who has towed the Democratic line on virtually every one of his signature initiatives. Conservatives hope he keeps towing that line right out of the White House in two years.

Tags:
Theodore Roosevelt,
Tea Party,
Congress,
2012 presidential election,
Franklin Delano Roosevelt,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Some people are so stupid they do not see when they are being sold down the river. The more the government owns in corporate America the more we are becomeing a socialistic Communist country where the uper class elite have everything and the lower class has nothing.

as far as the GM bail out goes if they needed bailing out so damn bad then why did they make a huge contribution to the democratic Black caucaus after they got that bail out? smells like a bribe to me but Hey if you want to think they miraculously had a windfall after getting their big government bail out you go right ahead and keep your blinders on.

If Obamas administration is so good then why are his closest advisory leaving right and left. But some of you out therte are just to stupid to see what is really happening out there. So you keep right on yapping and when the goons come to your house and take away your fancy cars and fancy houses Do not say you were not warned ......

Max of VA 6:31PM August 11, 2010

Hunter, I used to live in Madison (bet it's your favorite city in Wisconsin) and I knew lots of guys like you who thought that anyone who was motivated enough to get an education and better themselves was an "elitist." It's just part of the anti-intellectual culture being promoted by the likes of FOX and their disgusting ilk. You shouldn't resent us. We're not trying to run your life. We're trying to stop the fascists from running (and taking) ours.

And Bill, you talk an awful lot about the will of the people. Well the people have spoken in November 2008 and 66 million of them voted for Obama and many other Democrats. You obnoxious Republicans haven't shut up for one minute. You've been deliberately disrupting and sabotaging efforts being made to get this county back on its feet. For this you are treasonous. Obama, as I have pointed out, has given more tax breaks to the lower 80% of income earners in eighteen months than Bush gave in eight years, especially if you count all the additional entitlement spending (such as the unemployment extensions) and other middle class oriented spending since the passage of ARRA. Bush did very little for the middle class by comparison. He focused mainly on the rich.

I think we will get a surprise in November especially if the radical tea party candidates run. I hope the voters put these fascists back in their place.

steve of IL 12:54AM August 08, 2010

If you need an example , your dumber and more ate up with the dumb a-- than 90 % of us out here think you are .

You really do think most of us out here are really , really stupid , and you so called really , really smart people know what's best for all of us . Heavy burden for you really , really smart people to carry .

Don't worry , come Nov. , help will be here .

Hunter of WI 5:08PM August 07, 2010

Cameron Lynch

Cameron Lynch

Cameron Lynch is president the Lynch Group, a government relations, political consulting and government contracting firm. Formerly with the Bipartisan Policy Center, Lynch has worked for Sen. John McCain and former Sen. Bob Dole, among others. He teaches classes in political campaign strategy and historic Congressional agreements at the George Washington University Graduate School of Political Management.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement