Governors Give GOP Strong Presidential Bench in 2012 and Beyond

July 1, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Quarterly finance reports released today revealed that the Republican Governors’ Association--the national party committee charged with assisting Republican candidates in their bids for the highest office in their state--raised a staggering $19 million dollars in the second quarter of this year alone.

Much of that success is due to the unprecedented fundraising capability of the RGA chairman and Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour. In what could have been a disastrous PR episode for the RGA, the organization’s former chief, South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, was ousted as chairman for much publicized “personal reasons.” Reacting quickly and decisively, the RGA took lemons and made lemonade, moving to instate Barbour as its chair. The results, as the fundraising numbers show, have proven that move to be a wise one.

[See which industries give the most to Congress.]

Independent political analysis currently shows Republicans poised to win over two-thirds of their 37 races this year. Undoubtedly, the funding from the RGA will greatly assist in those elections. [See a slide show of 11 hot congressional races in November.]

Yet the impending rise of the Republican governors may have more of a national political impact than the casual observer would surmise.

The five presumable frontrunners for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination (Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty, Sarah Palin, Barbour, and Mitch Daniels) are all current or former governors. (In an interesting and somewhat absurd side note, Nikki Haley, the recently elected GOP nominee for the governor’s race in South Carolina, was asked on the night of her primary victory if she harbored presidential ambitions for 2012.) Dismissing that particular episode, a wave of GOP gubernatorial elections in 2010 may pave the way for strong Republican presidential candidates for many election cycles to come. 

History has shown that governors--both Republican and Democrat--make better presidents than legislators, largely due to their executive experience. Strong odds indicate that a current or former GOP governor will face off against President Obama in 2012.

The once seemingly invincible Obama political team should begin emphasizing (or perhaps spinning) Obama’s year and a half of executive experience in the White House. The problem with that strategy, however, is that the reviews for Obama’s only executive experience so far in his lifetime are, shall we say, less than stellar.

Corrected on 7/6/10: An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated the Republican Governors' Association fundraising numbers. They have raised $19 million dollars.

Tags:
Mitt Romney,
Mitch Daniels,
Mark Sanford,
Haley Barbour,
2010 election,
Tim Pawlenty,
Congress,
Barack Obama,
2012 presidential election,
Sarah Palin,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Keep an eye on John Thune (South Dakota) - I predicted way back in July of 2008 that Sarah Palin would be McCain's pick for VP and I'll say right now that this guy will be the nominee. Mark my words.

Harry Vest 1:47AM July 06, 2010

You President’s administration waved regulations that should have stopped that well. BP being by far worse regulation offender make me think no waver should have been given.

Bush ok'ed waver of Jones Act in three days to help in Katrina. Obama still hasn't waved Jones Act but is allowing certain foreign ship skimmers in after over 70 days.

Your "Jindal sobs about the poor Gulf,” Well I sob over Gulf leak too.

Jindal does not as you say "opposes any discipline to the corporate sleepy-heads who are destroying it." Where did you get your misinformation ?

Judge stopped obama's moratorium agreeing with Jindal. You know the ruling right ? Maybe you should learn the truth and not misquote.

Bill Hedges of MO 7:16PM July 01, 2010

or, for that matter, Huckabee or Jindal. And, that's too bad, all are intelligent and honest men - just not electable by a superficial, naive, special interest driven, electorate.

I think Palin (like Ross Perot) would be a lot of fun to watch in the White House. Sarah and Ross have common sense, morals and honesty. Man, talk about a shakeup for the smug, imperious, scheming progressives now in charge. Palin is the complete opposite of the slick huckster currently playing the role of prez (basically an audition for his "Savior of the Planet" role after 2016. Sara would be the anti-Obama. But alas, like Newt, she is unelectable.

The Republican Party's problem in 2012 is that they are short on glib, facile, photogenic, pseudo intellectuals - you know the kind of candidates that young people and Obamatrons like to vote for.

Think about it - Imagine Abe Lincoln trying to run against a glitzy phony like Obama - No chance. And so, we get what we deserve.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 4:19PM July 01, 2010

Cameron Lynch

Cameron Lynch

Cameron Lynch is president the Lynch Group, a government relations, political consulting and government contracting firm. Formerly with the Bipartisan Policy Center, Lynch has worked for Sen. John McCain and former Sen. Bob Dole, among others. He teaches classes in political campaign strategy and historic Congressional agreements at the George Washington University Graduate School of Political Management.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement