No More Patience on the National Debt, Federal Budget Deficit

February 17, 2011 RSS Feed Print

I’m tired of being patient. Yea, it may be a virtue; but it’s also threatening my future.

After receiving a good deal of criticism for his failure to deal with entitlement reform, President Obama took to the lectern Tuesday to joke about the impatience of Washington. “Part of the challenge here is that this town--let’s face it, you guys are pretty impatient,” Obama quipped. “If something doesn’t happen today, then the assumption is it’s just not going to happen. Right?” [Read more stories about the deficit and national debt.]

Right!

Sadly, it’s become much more than an assumption. As New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie explained in a speech yesterday at the American Enterprise Institute:

What that means in Trenton, and what I suspect it means in Washington also, is this. It means we are going to drag our feet for as long as we can until we hope it dies a natural death because God knows we don't want our fingerprints on it for murdering it, but we also don't have the guts to do it. . . Ladies and gentlemen I think it's time for some impatience.

My generation cannot afford to wait any longer because America’s creditors aren’t willing to wait forever. Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare, the main spending drivers behind our debt, are on pace to grow substantially for the foreseeable future. They don’t even represent the main problem. Nick Gillespie and Veronique de Rugy explain in a new article that the primary budgetary threat is our growing interest payments. They point to a CBO projection that over the “next 70 years, public money spent on interest will grow from 1.4 percent of GDP (or $204 billion in 2010 dollars) to almost 41.4 percent of GDP (or $27.2 trillion in 2010 dollars).” [Take the U.S. News poll: Is Obama right on entitlements?]

Yes, you read that correctly--$27.2 trillion. With a T.

So forget patience. My generation needs to force politicians to toss out the old playbook--one in which politicians ignore the unpopular problems, instead focusing on, as Chris Christie calls it, “the candy of American politics.” High-speed rail, green technology, expanded internet access, all great, but it won’t matter unless someone steps up with the guts to deal with our debt.

The wait, wait, then obfuscate, approach to politics has to go. And I think young adults are just the generation to do it.

The under-30 crowd is becoming a dominant political voice around the globe. Time magazine has an article today explaining that the underlying feature of the Middle East’s recent upheaval is a population where 60 percent are under 30 years old. They cite a recent survey of Middle Eastern youth that finds “the No. 1 wish of the young in nine countries was to live in a free country.”

Now let me be clear, I’m not calling for a violent regime change or even a mass youth movement of any kind, I use the example to simply show that young adults have the power to change politics. Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels clearly recognized the strain of liberty that runs in young adults. In his speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference last week he laid out an “assignment [for] this generation of freedom fighters.” He said we are “tasked to rebuild not just a damaged economy, and a debt-ridden balance sheet, but to do so by drawing forth the best that is in our fellow citizens.” [See a slide show on 10 GOP frontrunners for 2012.]

We don’t need to be violent. In fact, we must be the opposite; we must show that our path is the one of hope.

But hope, like patience, only gets you so far. If President Obama is not going to lead us in creating solutions to these problems, then conservatives must be bold in their approach. They must be hopeful in word but decisive in action. [See photos of the Obamas behind the scenes.]

Boldness will require, once again, tossing out the old playbook that says talking about Social Security and Medicare reforms is akin to political suicide. Christie said yesterday, “here is the truth that no one is talking about: you’re going to have to raise the retirement age for Social Security. Oh I just said it and I’m still standing here! I did not vaporize.”

Such honesty is hard to come by in a Washington that takes a wait-and-see or a you-first approach to governing. The time for such games is over. Waiting is no longer a virtue young adults should hold dear in our politicians, our generation must instead demand action.

Tags:
deficit and national debt,
Congress,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"It’s common knowledge that the budget deficit won’t come down much without cuts in entitlements. And Republican members of the House Appropriations Committee are asking President Barack Obama to address that need, The Hill reports."

"The $100 billion in spending cuts the committee agreed upon last week apply to discretionary spending, which makes up only 16 percent of the federal budget. Committee member Steve LaTourette, R-Ohio, noted that despite all the “gnashing of teeth,” the cuts are “small potatoes” compared to entitlement spending."

"Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., who chairs the House Appropriations Commerce-Justice-Science subcommittee, says Obama’s 2012 budget request should reflect the conclusions of the president’s debt commission. “He has got to embrace the Bowles-Simpson commission, he has got to talk about entitlements, that is where the money will come from,” Wolf said."

http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/GOPHouseCommitteeSeeksEntitlementCuts/2011/02/14/id/385972

Bill Hedges of MO 9:02AM February 19, 2011

The reason interest costs will grow is because of spending on those same entitlements you brushed over. The argument you're making is basically the same as "I am broke because I pay too much interest on my credit cards, not because I borrowed more than I could ever feasibly pay back and failed to deal with it in a rational manner. No. The problem is my interest, which is completely seperate from that."

At this point, given the recent proposals by Republicans, whom also failed to enact any entitlement cuts, the blame is not solely on Obama.

What an amateurish column. I am ashamed that you are even allowed a large scale forum like this to voice your ignorance.

Weak.

Shaun of KS 1:34AM February 19, 2011

This in 1992

“List of government entitlement programs?”

“for persons with limited income,”

“Combined Federal, State and Local Welfare Budget, 1992 (millions) Medicaid $118,067 AFDC 24,923 Food Stamps 24,918 Supplemental Security Income 22,774 Lower income housing asst. 12,307 Earned Income Tax Credit 9,553 Veterans medical care 7,838 Stafford loans 5,683 Social Services (Title 20) 5,419 Pell Grants 5,374 Low-rent public housing 5,008 General medical assistance 4,850 Foster Care 4,170 School Lunch 3,895 Pensions for needy veterans 3,667 General Assistance 3,340 Head Start 2,753 Food supplements, Women, infants and children 2,600 Training for disadvantaged youth and adults 1,744 Low-income energy assistance 1,594 Rural housing loans 1,468 Indian Health Services 1,431 Summer youth employment 1,183 Maternal and child health 1,059 JOBS and WIN 1,010 Job Corps 955 Child care block grant 825 School Breakfast 782 Child care for AFDC 755 Nutrition Program for Elderly 659 Housing interest reduction 652 Child and adult care food program 624 "At risk" child care 604

Source: Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, "Cash and Noncash Benefits for Persons with Limited Income: Eligibility Rules, Recipient and Expenditure Data, FY 1990-92," Report 93-832 EPW and earlier reports.”

Of course, there are many entitlement programs that are not necessarily for persons with limited income, including Medicare and Veterans Benefits, that add up to more dollars than this.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/List_of_government_entitlement_programs#ixzz1ELtosjnQ

Bill Hedges of MO 5:40PM February 18, 2011

Brandon Greife

Brandon Greife

Brandon Greife is the political director for the College Republican National Committee.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Concordia Ship Disaster

The Costa Concordia luxury cruise ship keeled over after it ran aground off the coast of Italy.

advertisement