Obama’s Investment Tax Hike Will Harm the Economy

October 1, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

We’re now entering the heart of the football season. The cupcake portion of the college schedule is over, the first few tune-up games of the NFL season are behind us. Frankly, it is put up or shut up time on the gridiron.

Football is the ultimate team sport. A complex machine with 11 individual moving parts, each of whom must perform their individual role perfectly for a play to work. Gel as a team, almost regardless of individual talent, and you’ll succeed; remain divided and you’ll fail. As legendary Packers coach (Go Pack Go!) Vince Lombardi said, “People who work together will win, whether it be against complex football defenses, or the problems of modern society.”

The sluggish economy is today’s main societal problem and it will take a team effort to get it back on track. Unfortunately, our team is fractured and our locker room is in disarray. On the one hand we have Washington, whose main concern at this moment is racing back to their districts to fight for re-election. On the other hand are businesses, demanding an ounce of policy certainty before they begin to hire.

[Read more about the economy and unemployment.]

The debate over the expiring Bush-era tax cuts on the wealthy has dominated the recent headlines, but a more economically ominous tax debate looms. To businesses and investors--two of the main engines of job growth--President Obama’s proposed tax increase on capital gains and dividends is the central concern.

The president plans on allowing key, if forgotten, elements of the Bush tax cuts to expire for capital gains and dividends. If the plan becomes reality, the top tax rate on these investments will jump from 15 percent to 20 percent at the end of the year.

In essence, this is a tax on investment success, whether it be a profit made on the sale of a stock, or money received out of corporate profits. This will have a twofold impact. First, businesses and entrepreneurs are dependent on infusions of capital to grow and thus hire more people. Taxing investment in these businesses and entrepreneurs leads investors away from high-risk, high-reward ventures. Second, a Barclays Capital report finds that the tax increase will cause an 8.6 percent drop in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, a key indicator of stock market health. This means that those holding stocks, including retirement investments in IRAs and 401(k)’s, could see a dramatic reduction in their wealth. Less wealth leads to less consumer spending, just the thing our government has been trying desperately to stimulate.

For an economy attempting to claw its way out of a recession, these results could prove disastrous. As the Congressional Budget Office wrote in 2007:

[Taxes on capital gains and dividends] distort investment to some degree … Those distortions interfere with the allocation of investment to whatever use has the highest economic return. Consequently, they reduce economic efficiency and leave most people less well off.

Less well off is not exactly where most investors, or average citizens, would like to find themselves right now. It should come as no surprise then that the business community and Washington are miles apart in terms of an economic game plan. What is surprising is that the Democratic Party itself is torn over the potential tax hike. Forty-seven House Democrats have signed a letter asking House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to maintain the lower tax rates on investment income. [See where Pelosi gets her campaign money.]

By keeping dividends and capital gains tax rates linked and low for everyone, we can help the private sector create jobs and allow seniors and middle class households to save and invest more. A dividends tax increase would impede our nation's economic recovery by decreasing the amount of capital that companies would have access to, thereby slowing the private sector's ability to grow and create jobs.

Defeating this recession and winning back prosperity will take a perfectly played game. We cannot afford to have the government and the business community fighting to use two separate playbooks. Even more important, we cannot refuse to work together because it says “Republican” or “Democrat” on the back of our jerseys. People who work together win and this is a game we can’t afford to lose.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
stocks,
recession,
corporate taxes,
401(k),
NFL,
George W. Bush,
economy,
football,
Congress,
taxes,
Republican Party,
Nancy Pelosi,
economic stimulus,
unemployment,
Barack Obama,
IRA

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Get over it, Bush piled on most the deficit we have right now. Sure Obama has had to try to dig the country out of this hole we are in, but its was the frikin hole Bush and the republicans buried us in.

The hacks always try to go after FDR, but it was one of FDR's regulatory agencies, the FDIC, that helped prevent a total collapse of the banks and our economy during Bush's Crash of 2008. Remember, when McCain flipped out and scared off any voters who didn't already know he is just a flaky opportunist able to flipflop on every issue he's ever confronted.

Everyone should know that FDR left this country with fifty years of best prosperity unmatched ever in our history, leading this country to become the superpower it is today.

Its the same ole knuckleheads who smear Obama all the time and defend Bush. Go ahead and keep making up your jaded fiction, it reflects the dishonesty and shallow thinking that marks the Republican angst. Just keep it up! Its the crazy talk of the teabaggers and jive from these same ole' characters here that is driving moderates and Democrats to vote against the nutjob agenda of the Republican T-Party. As an Ex-republican, I know the types thoroughly and know them to be demented to the core.

The GOP is sinking in the polls fast. The tides have turned against the GOP. The only possible way to win the mid-terms was a weak turnout of democrats. The tables are turned and all the crazy talk is provoking the moderate majority to go the polls to defeat the extremist GOP jerks bent on tearing this country down, again.

John of AZ 2:15AM October 05, 2010

Obama Defeats FDR (in Spending Other People’s Money)

The bottom line on Obama: He puts our money where his mouth is.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

By Terence P. Jeffrey

After he signed a law last week authorizing the U.S. Treasury to borrow an additional $1.9 trillion, President Barack Obama delivered a characteristically sanctimonious speech. It was about his deep commitment to frugality.

“After a decade of profligacy, the American people are tired of politicians who talk the talk but don’t walk the walk when it comes to fiscal responsibility,” he said. “It’s easy to get up in front of the cameras and rant against exploding deficits. What’s hard is actually getting deficits under control. But that’s what we must do. Like families across the country, we have to take responsibility for every dollar we spend.”

To put Obama’s Olympian hypocrisy in perspective, one need only examine the federal budget tables posted on the White House website by Obama’s own Office of Management and Budget.

They reveal these startling facts: When calculated by the average annual percentage of the Gross Domestic Product that he will spend during his presidency, Obama is on track to become the biggest-spending president since 1930, the earliest year reported on the OMB’s historical chart of spending as a percentage of GDP. When calculated by the average annual percentage of GDP he will borrow during his presidency, Obama is on track to become the greatest debter president since Franklin Roosevelt.

Obama will outspend and out-borrow the admittedly profligate George W. Bush, a man Obama and his lieutenants routinely malign for fiscal recklessness and who, when in office, was often hailed even by his allies as a Big Government Republican. Obama will even outspend—but not quite out-borrow—his fellow welfare-state liberal FDR, who had to contend with both the Depression and World War II.

In determining this was the case, I credited the presidents prior to Obama with the federal spending and borrowing that occurred during the fiscal years that started when they were in office. I credited Obama with the spending and borrowing that his own OMB estimates will occur during the fiscal years from 2010 to 2013, which are the four fiscal years starting during Obama’s four-year term. (Before fiscal 1977, fiscal years ran from July 1 to June 30. Since then, they have run from Oct. 1 to Sept. 30.)

FDR was inaugurated in March 1933 and died in April 1945. He is thus responsible for the 12 fiscal years from 1934 to 1945. During those years of depression and world war, according to OMB, federal spending averaged 19.35 percent of GDP. During Obama’s four fiscal years, OMB estimates spending will average 24.13 percent of GDP. That is about 25 percent more than under FDR.

There is much, much more printed fact that would tell all of us that Obama is simply the wrong person in our White House.

Reading and comprehension is necessary.

Apropo of CA 6:53AM October 04, 2010

For some reason you fail to note Bush tax cuts applied to most Americans. You don't seem to be in any rush to take away the cuts from the less rich. Cutting taxes is not the problem but larger government and spending is.

http://washingtonindependent.com/98956/the-cbo-on-the-bush-tax-cuts

Bill Hedges of MO 11:45AM October 03, 2010

Brandon Greife

Brandon Greife

Brandon Greife is the political director for the College Republican National Committee.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

advertisement