Obama, Democrats Will Feel the Squeeze on Poor Jobs Report

June 5, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (27)

By Brandon Greife, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Graduation season is wrapping up. Millions of college graduates have walked across the stage to accept their diploma, shaken hands with their dean, and sat through endless rounds of pictures with mom and dad. In good years many of those graduates trade their robes and mortarboard for a suit and a briefcase. As May’s job numbers show, this is not one of those good years.

According to the May report, released by the Labor Department, job creation by private companies grew at the slowest pace of the year. This contrasted sharply with the hopeful tone President Obama took on Wednesday saying, “[w]e expect to see strong jobs growth in Friday’s report … This economy is getting stronger by the day.”

In reality the jobs growth appears limited to temporary positions with the U.S. Census. The government report said that of the 431,000 jobs added, 411,000 of them were the direct result of the once-in-a-decade census.

20,000 private sector jobs is not the kind of growth we need to get back on track. As the Economic Policy Institute argues:

In order to fully fill in the gap in the labor market in the next two years (by November 2011), employment would have to increase by an average of 581,000 jobs every month between now and then.

Liberal economist Paul Krugman offers up a more modest goal--to return to full employment in five years, rather than two. Even that would take creating 10.7 million jobs. He argues that “[e]ven if we add 300,000 jobs a month, we’re looking at a prolonged period of suffering.”

300,000! The private sector didn’t even accomplish 1/10 of that goal last month.

In other words, it’s a tough time to be starting a career. Unless of course, your idea of a dream job is knocking on doors to collect information for the Census Bureau. If it is not, you’re likely sitting at home drafting cover letters, sending out resumes, and waiting on a response that begins with something other than “unfortunately.” The fact is an entire generation is in jeopardy. They are facing pressure from above, in the form of laid off workers looking for jobs, and below, as new batches of graduates flood the job market. Young adults are simply being squeezed right out of the job market.

Democrats should also be feeling the squeeze. Many incumbents understand that their poll numbers are likely to parallel the success of the economy. More job report flops like May and the uproar over a do-nothing Congress will build. Point to better unemployment numbers and signs of job creation and the anti-incumbent ruckus will subside. Oddly, many Democrats seem to be leaving the economy to chance. Rather than focus on “jobs, jobs, jobs” they have decided to lie low in the wake of tough votes on healthcare reform and a national debt that recently topped $13 trillion.

Young adults are also lying low. Not by choice, but because many of us have little else to do. We need a Washington ready to take charge. To admit that creating a mere 20,000 private sector jobs was a disappointment and laying out a plan to create more. Instead, President Obama said “[t]his report is a sign that our economy is getting stronger by the day.”

Unfortunately, Mr. President, the 666 jobs created each day in May isn’t going to cut it. Not when even the most liberal of economists are demanding 10,000. Last month graduates walked across the stage to collect their diploma; if these job numbers don’t improve young adults will soon be handing Democrats their walking papers.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Census Bureau,
2010 Congressional elections,
Barack Obama,
employment,
economy,
debt,
Congress,
healthcare,
healthcare reform

Reader Comments Read all comments (27)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Pro-Lifers brag about how many "innocent babies" they saved by attacking clinics & killing abortionists. They keep quiet that they stop abortion because it kills a potential tither. For the same reason, they ban suicide because corpses stop being church benefactors. Well, Prolife saved milliions of conceptions. They lived & many are part of the "high teen unemployment problem of whites & minorities." Un-aborted conceptions are out of high school & compete with their parents & siblings for the few jobs in town. The depression is so bad that even previously retired people compete with their families to save themselves from starvation, foreclosure or eviction. Millions of unwanted but not-aborted conceptions go into brothels in human trafficking. In very poor areas, parents are selling their kids as whores to keep themselves alive. Obama is Pro-Choice & appointed a judge to the Supreme Court whose vote will save Roe v Wade. In 1973, the court made our civil government stop enforcing church law that bans abortion. Separation of church & state means exactly this: Church laws are for congregations only. Worry about your job? Elect Pro-Choice candidates & support them.

ajura dawnveirs of CA 3:55AM June 10, 2010

@ Ron W. Smith of UT (Jun 08, 2010 15:20:30 PM)

Obama needs no defending?

“A month and a half after the BP spill began, the poll by ABC news and the Washington Post found that 69 percent of respondents gave a negative rating to the federal government response, compared to 62 percent who negatively rated the government’s handling of Katrina two weeks after that devastating August 2005 hurricane.”

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2010%5C06%5C09%5Cstory_9-6-2010_pg4_5

He “took on a hot plate in January of 2009 and we're now getting what we're getting--very little that's more than we might expect after just 17 months”?

Those are your expectations, not mine. Bush the Younger inherited the dot.com bust and recession from Clinton. Large corporations had not been brought to justice for committing crime on a gigantic scale. We had 9/11 and the resulting huge hit to the economy from that bloody attack, plus two ensuing wars. None of the hurricanes on Bush’s watch were his fault, though he can be faulted for his response to Katrina. Despite all that, President Bush presided over 52 straight months of job growth. President Clinton inherited an economy already in expansion before he was first elected and failed to bag bin Laden when offered him on a silver platter. One could go on. Folks on the left side of the American political spectrum generally weren’t giving W slack at 17 months in, though, like Obama, he had a tough row to hoe.

“Financial institutions have been stabilized”?

Obama wasn’t President when the effective steps were taken to insure that.

“To expect rapid jobs growth is to overlook much that needs to be in place first--renewed consumer spending, tax revenue up, disastrous foreclosures at an end, short selling stayed, markets stabilized, and so on. The jobs will come not as a result of tax cuts (Reagan's remedy good in its time, bad here) but as a result of a return to more normal times. Will that be a couple more years? Five more? Again, time will tell, but short cuts will not do the trick. Plodding ahead will.”

What is at issue is not an unrealistic expectation of mine. This administration’s justification for their stupendous stimulus bill was that it was needed for the country to avoid (their publicly projected) 8.5% unemployment. The bill passed. Unemployment went soaring past 8.5% and is now a painful 9.7%. Discuss those expectations.

Your answer to my seeking support for your contention as to the size of Defense outlays reduces to, “Go find out for yourself,” and, “Trust me.” That is, you offered no such support. My posts here have repeatedly offered specific evidentiary support. Also, in general, support I have adduced for my arguments has seldom come from sources supportive of the right wing. No one need bury themselves in thick volumes of Federal statistics, analyses or reports for days to find justification for what I have said on many points: follow the provided links, read, and ruminate thereon.

neopatetic of CA 10:06AM June 09, 2010

Ron W. at your service, Neopatetic.

Obama needs no defending. He took on a hot plate in January of 2009 and we're now getting what we're getting--very little that's more than we might expect after just 17 months. Financial institutions have been stabilized. (For how long only time will tell.) To expect rapid jobs growth is to overlook much that needs to be in place first--renewed consumer spending, tax revenue up, disastrous foreclosures at an end, short selling stayed, markets stabilized, and so on. The jobs will come not as a result of tax cuts (Reagan's remedy good in its time, bad here) but as a result of a return to more normal times. Will that be a couple more years? Five more? Again, time will tell, but short cuts will not do the trick. Plodding ahead will.

The more complicated matter of from whence the nearly 60% figure in one of my previous comments? American Friends, probably two years ago, put me on a research adventure. A strip flier they've been sending out for a long time now, "Just How Much of Our Money Will Go to the Military Next Year?," got my attention. They claimed 59%, pretty accurately as I discovered. Not all of the money is in the national defense budget; much of it is line-itemed in discretionary spending and other areas.

Get started with www.usa.gov and focus on budgets once you're through that portal. Then, be on the lookout for other non-government likely sources of information like www.armscontrolcenter.org and many others. Be aware that anything that contributes to our enormous spending on the combination of national defense, homeland security, nation building, foreign aid designed to gain the cooperation of other countries, and veterans affairs figures into the 60% of total budget I claimed.

Prepare to be amazed, Neopatetic. The persistent projection of American power into places near and far is an expensive undertaking--especially now that we're the world's largest debtor nation AND trying to dodge the slings and arrows of terrorists.

Ron W. Smith of UT 3:20PM June 08, 2010

Brandon Greife

Brandon Greife

Brandon Greife is the political director for the College Republican National Committee.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

advertisement