2012 Republican Candidates Forget About Jobs

June 16, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (16)

U.S. Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York recently said there were two mandates from the 2010 midterm elections, but lawmakers only talk about one, which is to reduce the deficit. An examination of the data from the media’s exit survey proves his point. Four of 10 (40 percent) voters indicated that Congress’s first priority was to reduce the federal deficit. But almost as many (37) voters wanted Congress to spend money to create new jobs. Only a few brave souls dare to speak the truth, which is that federal spending is the investment that corporate America won’t make. At least in the United States.

Schumer’s statement came before the Republican presidential debate on Monday. I’m sure he and I were thinking same thing as the Republicans talked about corporate tax cuts and regulations and pandered to the Tea Party with gay and Muslim bashing. What happened to jobs? [See a slide show of GOP 2012 contenders.]

Is it crazy to spend federal money on job training, education, transportation, and green energy to create jobs when there’s a budget deficit? That approach makes a lot more sense than reducing taxes on bankers, brokers, and billionaires in order to increase tax revenues. George Orwell would appreciate GOP economic message, which is “less is more.” The Election Day poll indicated that almost two of every three Americans (64 percent) did not want to extend the Bush tax cuts for wealthy Americans. But the first thing Congress and the president did after Election Day was to extend the Bush tax cuts for rich people. So much for election mandates.

The same exit poll indicated that more Americans blamed the economic collapse on Wall Street than President Barack Obama. But Wall Street is having its way now in Washington. All of the Republican candidates beat up on corporate regulations Monday. Congressional Republicans are trying to undo the reforms passed by Congress last year to limit abuses in the financial industry. The Bush administration killed many corporate regulations in the last decade. And look what happened: The bad boys on Wall Street took advantage of those regulatory cuts to kill the economy, which in turn led to millions of Americans losing their jobs and then their homes. [Check out political cartoons about the 2012 GOP field.]

Sam Rayburn, the late, great Democratic speaker of the House of Representatives, once said, “Any jackass can knock down a barn door, but it takes a carpenter to build one.” The jackasses were on full display Monday night. It’s time for Democratic populists to step forward and call for building things up rather than burning them down.

The GOP has succeeded in hijacking the mandate of last year’s elections. Democrats need to show some guts and reclaim the economic populist part of message from the 2010 campaign.

Tags:
Congress,
Republican Party,
deficit and national debt,
2012 presidential election,
unemployment,
Chuck Schumer,
energy policy and climate change,
Democratic Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (16)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Two things Republicans don't consider important.

Two things that Americans realize are vital.

Two reasons that the GOP is plain bad for America.

Better not to even talk about it in the debate since none of these candidates have any policies that create jobs in the US or improve the future of the country, our public education systems. Apparently the Republican platform is anti-public education and the GOP tax cuts for the rich might create jobs in China but kill jobs in the US.

Oh yea, all of these GOP candidates want to kill Medicare since all supported Ryan's Bill to Kill Medicare. Some even went further wanting to kill Social Security.

All of this garbage just ruins the country more, as if Republican policies haven't already ruined our economy enough.

That's why most polls are saying None of the Above about the GOP 2012 field.

Americans should just say No to these jerks.

Stan of CO 1:59PM June 17, 2011

brucetee_ barry one destroying medicare...

"Why Paul Ryan’s Medicare Is So Much Better Than Obama’s"

Posted on May 7, 2011 by Barbara

Peter Ferrara

"Obama said regarding the Ryan budget plan, “No I don’t think it is particularly courageous. Because…nothing is easier than solving a problem on the backs of people who are poor or people who are powerless or don’t have a lobbyist or don’t have clout.”

"How does obamacare cut cost, but help "people who are poor or people who are powerless or don’t have a lobbyist or don’t have clout.”

"cuts in payments to doctors and hospitals under Medicare as provided in current law due to Obamacare and President Obama’s Medicare reimbursement policies is $15 trillion!"

"These Medicare cuts were the foundation for CBO finding that Obamacare would actually reduce the deficit, despite adopting or expanding three entitlement programs.

"Medicare’s Chief Actuary reports that even before these cuts already two-thirds of hospitals were losing money on Medicare patients."

"The unworkable, draconian effect of these Medicare cuts is why the U.S. Government Accountability Office issued a disclaimer..."

Unlike Ryan’s careful Medicare reforms, these draconian, unworkable, Obamacare cuts to Medicare apply to seniors already retired today. Ryan exempts from any change all seniors retired today and everyone over age 55. On these grounds alone, Ryan’s Medicare is better for today’s seniors than Medicare under Obamacare.

That will involve an additional $500 billion in Medicare cuts for today’s seniors by 2023, “and an additional one trillion dollars in the decade after that,” in Obama’s own words.

"Obama proposed to give even more power to the unelected, unaccountable, Washington bureaucrats on his Commission to cut Medicare further, by undemocratic automatic sequester that bypasses Congress entirely."

"Seniors would do far better each choosing their own health insurers themselves in a competitive marketplace, which is the system that has generated the highest standard of living in the world in America for all goods and services."

"Even President Obama was forced to admit before the Facebook audience that the Ryan Medicare plan “will control costs, except if you get sick and the policy that you bought doesn’t cover what you’ve got….If you’re somebody who’s older and has a pre-existing condition, insurance companies won’t take you.” But that’s not how the private insurance companies under Medicare Advantage work. Nor is that true of the private Medigap plans, whose sellers include AARP, central players in Obama’s own political machine."

http://blogs.forbes.com/peterferrara/2011/04/28/paul-ryan-medicare-better-than-obamas/

http://www.912superseniors.org/2011/05/why-paul-ryans-medicare-is-so-much-better-than-obamas/

Bill Hedges of MO 11:46AM June 17, 2011

to all you misguided neocons,your beating a dead horse.the ryan medicare plan is dead.they just haven;t finished putting all the nails in it;s coffin.

bruce b of NV 12:33AM June 17, 2011

Brad Bannon

Brad Bannon

Brad Bannon runs Bannon Communications Research, a political polling and consulting firm which helps labor unions, progressive issue groups, and Democratic candidates win public affairs and political campaigns. Brad guest hosts Leslie Marshall’s nationally syndicated radio talk show and is a commentator on America’s Radio News Network. Follow him on Twitter @BradBannon.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

A Democracy in Crisis

Can the country long survive an ever-growing government?

Latest Videos

advertisement