Obama, Palin, McConnell New Year's Resolutions

Reader Comments
Back to blog

Polls was against passage of obamacare and near all if not all of legislation passed. Many laws passed without due time to study.
Attitude of NO seems reasonable, especial with Republicans mostly left out of the process. Elections leading up to Nov. 2 forewarned the approach of the Democrat BLACK HOLE. Across this Nation.
TEA was barry’s responsibility and reason for existence. barry's ACORN got unfunded and out of limelight. Few in Nov. ran on passing obamacare. Most took pride and ran on abolishing and/or fact they voted against. How demoralizing for you PROGRESSIVES.
I don’t see much blasting of CNN here by the right. With CNN small audience compared to Fox there is no need. I only mention John Kerry and his mess docking his boat in RI. Dailey he is out of my comments and thoughts.
Sarah is the grit in the air you breathe. Irritating your lifeline to life. Petty remarks about killing for food makes you a small man with no substance or good substantial reasons to discredit Sarah. A incompetent analysis you prove yourself to be. A mere backstreet brawler. Far from championship bouts…

Bill Hedges of MO 5:36PM January 02, 2011

These # will look good against each other ....lasvegascomplaints will enjoy seeing the final results from them running against each other ...will make for good entertainment giggles........

Lasvegascomplaints of NV 6:18PM January 01, 2011

Brad,
A great new year's resolution would be for you to be more honest and accurate in your postings. Instead of saying that the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy are just for bankers and billioniares, you should also note that half those who would be subject to higher taxes earn between 250 and 440K. Or when you defend the DREAM act, should should be honest and point out that the act also provides a path to citizenship for the parents and other siblings of those who qualify under the DREAM act provisions. You have a right to your opinion, but a little more clarity and honesty in your postings would be appreciated.

Bob of TX 2:28PM December 31, 2010

Of course, I assumed that most folks new of the restrictions on missile defense for U.S.. But I suppose that was silly of me since Obama tried to bury that little tidbit - might have spoiled his kumbaya moment - but the answer my friends is blowin' in the wind.
Oh, and Barry McQuire - read the bill before you post.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 11:45AM December 31, 2010

Stop your mindless insults and read the person's message you complained about. Do you sniff paint fumes ? If any brain cells are still alive read my link:
1. "New START does limit U.S. missile-defense options. First, New START’s preamble not only references missile defense, it accedes to Russia’s insistence that there is an interrelationship between strategic offensive weapons and missile defense. While the Bush administration steadfastly refused to accept this Russian position, the Obama administration bows to it. The statement of interrelationship in the preamble, in addition to the specific missile-defense measures in the body of the treaty, amount to a major concession to Russia."
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/243540/eight-problems-new-start-mitt-romney
Most all of liberal's minds are on Uranus….

Bill Hedges of MO 11:03AM December 31, 2010

SCHAEFER, WHAT HAVE YOU BEEN SMOKING?
The Start treaty reduces BOTH Russian and American neuclear weapons. And BOTH still have enough to destroy the world. Why do you claim only American reductions?
In case you're just a "NO" party nut, previous Republican administrations have supported the Salt treaty. Republicans only oppose their former positions when Democrats propose them.
Neither party cares to do what is best for America. Max out our credit card, deficits don't matter. Just like wjen we do it, the reconning comes.

W. L. Head of NC 9:47AM December 31, 2010

It is about time Democrats admit their racist attitudes in the 1800’s. Was with only Republicans votes that got civil rights going. Only in recent years have Democrats joined us in civil rights movement. Shamefully Democrats lie about their past:
http://www.black-and-right.com/the-democrat-race-lie/
Pelosi claimed she would explain obamacare once passed. Well, it passed Nancy. Number of times barry said he would correct the lies said about obama. Still waiting barry.
Brad, you are a idiot. Sarah kills animals to eat. You are another Helen Thomas.
Diplomats playing spies on orders of Hillary Clinton should have got her fired. Hillary is another NUT CASE:
‘Book says Hillary talks to dead”
“First lady acknowledged
'imaginary' chats.”
June 22, 1996
Web posted at: 11:55 p.m. EDT
“WASHINGTON (CNN) -- First lady Hillary Rodham Clinton held imaginary conversations with Eleanor Roosevelt and Mahatma Gandhi as a therapeutic release, according to a new book written by Bob Woodward, says a report in Sunday's edition of The Chicago Sun-Times.”
http://edition.cnn.com/US/9606/22/hillary.book/index.html

Bill Hedges of MO 9:30PM December 30, 2010

But, she has more character and honor than the flim-flaming huckster who bought the White House in 2008.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 7:25PM December 30, 2010

Yeah, it paid off alright. The U.S. had to scrap missile defense and reduce the size of our nuclear deterrent. Rouge nations can now launch an ICBM with an expectation of success now that we have no possibility of a defensive shield. Way to go BHO.
Only progressive, America hating idiots, such as yourself and the preening egotist in the White House, view the U.S. as a threat to world peace. Perhaps you should both sit down and read a history book - preferably one written before 1970.
The U.S. and the world has been made less safe - START is STUPID for U.S. - Good for the Russians and terrorists. Obama hasn't a clue - simply a blind ideolog fumbling about in a kumbaya fantasy world. God help us.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 7:09PM December 30, 2010