• Comment (12)

Newt Gingrich's Iowa Anger Won't Help Him or GOP

January 4, 2012 RSS Feed Print

George H.W. Bush in 1980, Bob Dole in 1988, Mike Huckabee in 2008. The common thread between those men in those years—all three were winners of the Iowa caucuses and did not become the Republican nominee for president. 

Iowa has a very mixed record in predicting the GOP standard bearer.

It seems that the Iowa results will again not be representative this year as it is tough to imagine that former Gov. Mitt Romney and former Sen. Rick Santorum will be essentially tied for the GOP nomination at the end of the primary process.

[See pictures of the GOP Candidates Heading to the Iowa Caucus.]

Moreover, the inevitable talk of the Iowa vote being evidence of a weak and divided GOP is a false narrative. Both in 1980 and 1988 the candidate who lost Iowa, Reagan in 1980 and the senior Bush in 1988 went on to very decisive victories in the general election over Jimmy Carter and Michael Dukakis, respectively.

With history in mind, GOP candidates and voters have to remember that the goal is to beat President Obama in November. The way to do so is to focus on the economy and not give speeches about campaign inside baseball. 

Which bring me to the biggest disappointment of the night—former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. And not the fact that Newt came in fourth, that's what the polls predicted. It was the tone of Speaker Gingrich's concession. Newt was full of anger at Mitt Romney, he did everything but ask Mitt to "step outside." Just like Americans did not care when Newt complained about moderators during the debates, his anger over negative ads and Super PACs does not resonate.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Newt Gingrich.]

More importantly, public displays of antagonism pointed at another Republican candidate are counterproductive in terms of having a Republican (Romney, Gingrich, or anyone else) winning the White House.

The primaries in New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Florida loom large in the weeks ahead as their track record in choosing the nominee is stronger than Iowa's. However, it is vital for the candidates to realize that the election on Nov. 6, 2012 is what matters the most.

Tags:
Rick Santorum,
politics,
2012 presidential election,
Newt Gingrich,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Who cares about what helps Gingrich or the GOP, outside that is of Lady Boris Marmalade Ephsteyn, struttin' his stuff on the street for pimp daddy Romney?

Ron Paul, 2012. He's in it because we want him to be in it, and not for the same personal delusions of grandeur that characterize Obama and the rest of the republican candidates.

dom youngross of OH 3:43AM January 06, 2012

Not that I support Newt, but I wouldn't count him out yet. As Yogi Berra once said, "it ain't over til it's over".

Tom of TX 10:46PM January 04, 2012

Ps

Senator obuma was for war in Afghanistan...

Bill Hedges of MO 9:47PM January 04, 2012

Boris Epshteyn

Boris Epshteyn

Boris Epshteyn is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report.He is a Republican political strategist, investment banker, and finance attorney currently living in New York City. He was a communications aide with the McCain-Palin campaign. He is also a regular guest on MSNBC, CNN, CNBC, Fox News, and radio programs nationwide providing analysis on topics including political strategy, financial markets, international affairs, future elections, and party relations.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Latest Videos

advertisement

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.