Republicans Aren't Doing Better--Democrats Are Doing Worse

March 23, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Michael Barone, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Last Wednesday, I noted that Republicans are now running even or slightly ahead in the generic vote for Congress in two respected national polls. On Friday, Charlie Cook noted the same results. He pointed out that the NPR survey shows Independents favoring Republicans 38-24 percent and that Republican pollster Glen Bolger says this is the first time Independents have favored Republicans since 2004.

What is going on here? One thing we know is that these results represent more of a decline in the Democrats' numbers than an increase in the Republicans'. Some significant bloc of voters, heavily loaded toward independents, seem to have soured on the Democrats since Barack Obama took office and the 111th Congress went to work. How would this translate into votes in actual elections? Probably in the way we've seen in the special elections that have been held since November: the Senate runoff in Georgia, the two Louisiana House runoffs, three special elections for Virginia House of Delegate seats, the chairmanship of the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors, and the election of a new supervisor in Fairfax's Braddock district. These, by the way, can't be dismissed as purely Southern results; one of the House of Delegates seats and the two Fairfax races are in Northern Virginia, which voted heavily for Barack Obama in November 2008.

The common factor in all these races is that, as compared with November 2008, Democratic turnout is way down, much more than Republican turnout. Democrats are less enthusiastic, less motivated than they were last November. Remember that turnout was robust in November 2008. As Curtis Gans of the Center for the Study of the American Electorate reported, 63 percent of eligibles turned out to vote, the highest percentage since 1960. Perhaps not coincidentally, 1960 was the year that Americans elected our first Catholic president, and 78 percent of Catholics voted for him; 2008 was the year Americans elected our first black president, and 95 percent of blacks voted for him. Turnout was up 7.3 percent over 2004, although population rose only 3.8 percent in that period. Turnout seems to have increased by greater percentages among blacks and those under 30. According to the exit poll, blacks amounted to 13 percent of the electorate in 2008, compared to 11 percent in 2004 and 13.5 percent of 2007 population; those under 30 amounted to 18 percent of the electorate in 2008, compared to 17 percent in 2004 and 22 percent of 18-and-over population.

The decline in the Democratic percentage in the generic vote and the sharp drop-off in Democratic turnout in special elections suggest that in future contests in 2009 and 2010 Democrats will not be able to count on the robust turnout that contributed to the Obama and Democratic congressional victory margins in 2008. At least if opinion stays where it is right now. I should add, however, that opinion right now is not where it was in November 2008. I think we are in a period of what I call open field politics. Since 2004, starting around the time of Katrina and increased violence in Iraq, the generic vote and party identification have been considerably more unstable and volatile than they were in the years 1995-2005. That instability worked to Democrats' advantage in 2006, 2007, and 2008. Now it seems to be working against them—I was going to write to Republicans' advantage, but I think what we are seeing is more disillusionment toward Democrats than any positive feeling toward Republicans. In the short run, Republicans can benefit from this. In the longer run, they need to offer voters a better vision for the future, or they risk losing once again if there is a revival of enthusiasm among Democrats and warm feeling toward them among independents.

So to my question—Republicans doing better?—the answer is—no, Democrats doing worse.

On Facebook? You can keep up with Thomas Jefferson Street blog postings through Facebook's Networked Blogs.

Tags:
politics,
democratic party,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (45)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

местонахождение по телефону скачать 5

http://clusesmo.chez.com

nimmitydriday of AL 11:57PM November 01, 2009

"They who ran up our national debt by a factor of eleven, have a lot of gall to complain about deficit proposals designed to serve our needs at home, & undo Republican damage. " Now it's the Dims turn. It was"spend baby! spend!" with Bush and dillsional BO thinks he can follow suite. Get off your high, horse. For decades, Republitards and their pals the Dimocrats have been on a drunken spending spree. In six weeks, BO has proven to be a far worse spender than Bush ever was. Yeh, right, BO will save the economy by buttressing useless programs that should've died 30 years ago to keep Federal workers employed. I guess it'll take a few more months before your buyer's remorse set's in. In the meantime, we'll see how spending our way out of debt works out.

Vera71 of MD 11:40AM March 25, 2009

We just departed a quarter century of neocon ideology marked by the deification of greed & deregulation. Early fruits were the savings & loan debacle of the 1980s, & the collapse of ENRON, Worldcom, Tyco, Global Crossing, etc., in the late ‘90s & early 2000s.

Today we are trying to escape an economic collapse wrought by sub prime mortgages sold aggressively, & the bundling of those questionable assets into vaporous securities sold to gullible investors worldwide. The fraudulent bubble burst, damaging the world economy & our own as well, while the perpetrators skimmed commissions & bonuses, leaving investors & the public holding the bag.

With the “Republican Revolution,” in 1981, we applied Reaganomics. It pandered to us with tax cuts, & indeed they cut taxes, but on the flip side they never cut spending, they increased it, & then borrowed to pay the bills.

Any 7th grader with an allowance understands you can’t borrow your way to financial security. Most of us have awakened to that fact now, but for all those years the only thing we listened to was “tax cuts.”

As a result, since 1981 our national debt increased 11 times from about $900 billion, to nearly $11 trillion. As a proportion of our national income, it went up from less than a third in 1981 to about 80% today.

The debt was spent on war-making & foreign adventures; Grenada, El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Lebanon, Panama, the first Gulf War, Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc. Domestic needs for bridges, roads, the electrical grid, the health & welfare of our citizens, etc., were neglected.

While government debt increased exponentially, the economic well-being of many of us declined, & our stature in the world sank. Today we’re faced with a collapse of the private sector with massive unemployment, a deteriorating infrastructure, the economic costs of energy dependence, & the human costs of a dysfunctional health care system.

A rational individual viewing this wreckage would conclude we’ve been following a failed ideology & failed economic policies, but apologists like Barone, Limbaugh, Hannity, et al, continue to snow us.

We need a paradigm shift from the failed policies of the past quarter-century, & that is what Obama is attempting. He wants to keep the jobless & their families from starving, to rebuild our failing infrastructure, to reduce our foreign energy dependence, & to repair our costly, dysfunctional health care system.

For decades our Republican legislators never saw a deficit they didn’t like as long as it went for wars & foreign adventures. They fostered uncontrolled greed & fiscal irresponsibility while neglecting our infrastructure & the human needs of our citizens. They who ran up our national debt by a factor of eleven, have a lot of gall to complain about deficit proposals designed to serve our needs at home, & undo Republican damage.

Olroy of WA 7:45PM March 24, 2009

Michael Barone

Michael Barone

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

It’s Washington’s Birthday—Not Presidents' Day

It's time for Obama and Congress to give Presidents’ Day back to George Washington.

Cuba Is Reforming, But Not Nearly Enough

Cuban officials exaggerate the extent of reforms being enacted in the Castro brothers' Cuba.

Rick Santorum Will Spell Doom for Republicans in November

If it nominates Rick Santorum over MItt Romney, the GOP will lose the White House and elections at all other levels.

Obama's Energy Policy Isn't 'Crony Capitalism'

A majority of the energy companies who have received funds under Obama are thriving

Michigan Is a Must-Win ... For Rick Santorum

Winning in Michigan is at least as important to Santorum's campaign as it is to Romney's.

Why the Catholic Contraception Controversy Is So American

Politically speaking, the contraception controversy is a quirk of the way we pay for healthcare.

The Upside of the Racist Hoekstra Ad

In this era of nasty political rhetoric and advertising, the public will draw the line at something brazenly racist.

Barack Obama's Budget Is Even Worse Than It Looks

If Obama's budget for FY 2013 is adopted as written, the federal budget would never balance again.