Barack Obama and Rahm Emanuel Go After the Census

February 11, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Michael Barone, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

John Fund explains why Barack Obama (and Rahm Emanuel) want control of the Census. And here's more, from the testimony of Bruce Chapman, who was Director the census in the Reagan administration.

Tags:
census,
Barack Obama,
Census Bureau,
Rahm Emanuel

Reader Comments Read all comments (15)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

1. Gregg asks Obama (not the other way around) for the appointment as Commerce Secretary almost certainly because among other things, he wanted to be able to fulfill his long-standing desire to water down the census just like GWB did by under-counting minorities, the poor, and the homeless the in the first place. He wanted the job in part so that he could strangle the census.

2. Obama grants Gregg his wish, and nominates Gregg for Commerce Secretary.

3. Individuals and groups who are aware of Gregg's contempt for a census that includes everyone -- because that is standard Republican dogma and is something that is anathema to most Republican leaders -- come forth to express their deep concerns about placing a fox in charge of the census chicken coop.

4. When Obama learns from those groups of Gregg's preference for an unfairly limited census -- something Gregg has fought for in the past -- the President agrees to move control of the census out from under Gregg's jurisdiction. Obama does this out his zeal for bipartisanship, because he still wanted Gregg as his Commerce Secretary. MOVING THE CENSUS TO ANOTHER DEPARTMENT WOULD ALLOW OBAMA TO GET HIS NOMINATION APPROVED BY THE SENATE DEMOCRATS WHO WOULD OTHERWISE VOTE AGAINST HIM BASED ON GREGG'S HOSTILITY TO THE CENSUS.

5. When Gregg learns that one key area which he wanted to control -- the census -- is now out of the Commerce Secretary's jurisdiction, he decides he doesn't want the job anymore and so he withdraws his nomination!

There is NOTHING suspicious or nefarious about Obama's bending-over-backwards in order to try to fulfill Gregg's request to be Commerce Secretary -- compromises that were necessary to get Gregg's nomination through the Senate -- but there's a huge amount that is suspicious in Gregg's behavior! He tried to to scam us by taking control of the census, but when he learned that his manipulative ruse failed, he scampered away, defeated.

emmb of MI 2:27AM February 16, 2009

As an independent, a lot of us voted for Bush as the least harmful of two totally

inept candidates. I believe time has proven that Bush was demonstrably inept and Gore is a bona fide nut with money. He has a mental condition referred to as hardly excogitative, given

his looney co-opting of the enron hydro carbon scam. As for Obama, who can vote for president a mature adult who knows not "when life begins". That it is debatable? Elections are not won based on the qualifications or vision of the candidates (they are neither wise nor virtuous)

but on their ability (like Obama) to exploit the ignorance, complacence and outright stupidity of the electorate. Obama had enough money to be elected if he ran as a "HAM SANDWICH".BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA an elected means for the REQUIEM OF OUR NATION.Look a the three stooges running the congress? Pelosi, Reid and the ACLU!

Richard Whelan of NH 2:18PM February 15, 2009

The Chicago machine takes over the White House. Uggh.

Can't wait until that Blago case comes to fruition -- come on Mr. Fitzgerald -- we know Rahm is wrapped up in it. Let's move this along.

smc of NY 4:23PM February 13, 2009

Michael Barone

Michael Barone

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

It’s Washington’s Birthday—Not Presidents' Day

It's time for Obama and Congress to give Presidents’ Day back to George Washington.

Cuba Is Reforming, But Not Nearly Enough

Cuban officials exaggerate the extent of reforms being enacted in the Castro brothers' Cuba.

Rick Santorum Will Spell Doom for Republicans in November

If it nominates Rick Santorum over MItt Romney, the GOP will lose the White House and elections at all other levels.

Obama's Energy Policy Isn't 'Crony Capitalism'

A majority of the energy companies who have received funds under Obama are thriving

Michigan Is a Must-Win ... For Rick Santorum

Winning in Michigan is at least as important to Santorum's campaign as it is to Romney's.

Why the Catholic Contraception Controversy Is So American

Politically speaking, the contraception controversy is a quirk of the way we pay for healthcare.

The Upside of the Racist Hoekstra Ad

In this era of nasty political rhetoric and advertising, the public will draw the line at something brazenly racist.

Barack Obama's Budget Is Even Worse Than It Looks

If Obama's budget for FY 2013 is adopted as written, the federal budget would never balance again.