Low Voter Turnout in Virginia Special Election Could Signal a Worry for Democrats

January 15, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

By Michael Barone, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

I'm not sure what to make of this, but in the special election Tuesday for the Virginia House of Delegates 46th District seat vacated by Democrat Brian Moran (who is running for governor), the Democratic candidate won by only 16 votes, out of only 2,679 cast. The district is the western end of the independent city of Alexandria, a solidly Democratic constituency. By way of comparison, the district went 93 percent Democratic in 2007 and 72 percent Democratic in 2005, the last time there was a Republican candidate. Interestingly, the district's population in 2000 was 24 percent black and 13 percent Hispanic.

The results in two other Virginia delegate special elections, held on January 6, were very much in line with the districts' proclivities. The 70th District on the east side of Richmond and Henrico County, whose population was 61 percent black in 2000, voted 74 percent for the Democrat; the 81st District in Virginia Beach and Chesapeake voted 83 percent Republican. Both had low turnouts: 912 voters in the 70th District, 2,988 in the 81st. The 70th District was not contested by Republicans in 2007, 2005, 2003, or 2001. The last time the Democrats contested the 81st District was in 2003, when the Republican got 70 percent of the vote.

The result in the 46th District, and the turnout in all three districts, is fragmentary evidence that Democrats are having trouble duplicating the enthusiastic turnout they achieved for Barack Obama last November 4. You can add it to the fragmentary evidence in the results of the Georgia Senate runoff December 2 and the two Louisiana U.S. House runoffs December 6.

Here's a table showing the total voting for delegates in 2005, 2007, and 2009; turnout was much higher in 2005, when the governorship was up, than in the off year of 2007 or the special elections this month.

        2009 as % of
  2005 2007 2009 2005 2007
46th District   14,105  4,927  2,679  19  54
70th District  13,745  5,460  912  7  17
 81st District  11,775  4,512  2,988  25  66
    

What I think the numbers show is that a significantly larger percentage of Republicans than Democrats bothered to vote in these special elections. Black turnout seems to have been especially low. This runs at least a little contrary to expectations, since Republicans today have plenty of reasons to be dispirited and Democrats after Barack Obama's victory have plenty of reasons to be enthusiastic.

All of this may turn out to have no bearing on turnout in the 2009 elections in Virginia and New Jersey and the 2010 congressional elections. But if I were still a Democratic political consultant, I'd be just a bit concerned.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
politics,
elections,
voters,
Virginia

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Badly need your help. I know that you believe that you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.

I am from Serbia and also now teach English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "View account info, rate movies, connect with fans, more! How to draw a bunnysynopsis."

Regards 8) Caitrin.

Caitrin of MA 12:07AM February 23, 2009

gNNKmP hi! this is

hoolio of KS 8:24PM February 06, 2009

These numbers are dismall, indeed. However, I would like such articles to give me the complete picture by giving the total percentage of voters compared to the eligible number of voters, as it may give additional perspective.

For example, while the 2008 Obama campaign is considered a successful campaign, the voter turnout was a dismal 63% of the eligible electorate (http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781453.html). In other countries, such as in France, it was 84% in 2007 (http://www.idea.int/vt/country_view.cfm?CountryCode=FR). So, , there is still a lot of room for improvement in the US but I really wonder what will make it change.

GB of CA 12:44PM January 16, 2009

Michael Barone

Michael Barone

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

advertisement

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

Obama 'Going Bulworth' Wouldn't Give Him Power Over Republicans

Both Congress and presidents overestimate the power of the Oval Office.

Bureaucracy Keeps Adopted Children Stuck in International Limbo

The U.S. needs to do more to ease the international adoption process.

The Real Scandal Behind the Benghazi Emails and Attacks

The GOP focuses on talking points while ignoring dangerous security budget cuts.

House Republicans Waste Time With Obamacare Repeal Vote

Why is the House bothering to repeal Obamacare yet again?

advertisement