Obama’s Win Is Not Necessarily the Beginning of a Political Realignment

December 2, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (22)

By Michael Barone, Thomas Jefferson Street blog.

Beneath the numbers in political polls, which suggest a certain continuity of opinion, are millions of voters who keep changing their minds. This is the finding of a series of Associated PressYahoo polls as laid out in this Associated Press story. The APYahoo poll tracked some 2,000 adults periodically throughout the campaign—a panel back in the lingo of pollsters—starting in November 2007. Overall, 17 percent of those who ultimately voted for Obama said they were for McCain in at least one of the 10 tracking polls, while 11 percent of eventual McCain voters said they backed Obama. In other words, 14 percent of all voters switched from one candidate to the other over a period of 12 months. As the AP story concludes, "Election polls that showed only gradual shifts in support for Obama and McCain were masking a much more volatile electorate."

 

All of which is worth keeping in mind when you hear people predicting that Obama's election is the beginning of a lasting political realignment. That's possible. But it's far from inevitable. McCain, after all, was ahead during the first two weeks of September. Some may dismiss this as an ephemeral reaction to the two-party conventions and as a lead that could not be sustained. That may be right: We have no way of knowing for sure what would have happened in the absence of the financial crisis triggered by the collapse of Lehman Brothers September 15. But the APYahoo polls suggest that opinion was volatile and that in different circumstances the McCain lead might have endured. And that Obama's impressive 53 percent-46 percent lead should not be regarded as etched in stone. Voters this year, more than in 2000 or 2004, seemed to be willing to switch their votes in response to events. And it suggests that they may be willing to switch again—toward the Democrats or toward the Republicans—in the months and years ahead.

Tags:
2008 presidential election,
Barack Obama,
voters,
polls

Reader Comments Read all comments (22)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I like this web very much.

This is such a extraordinary site.

And it is not like other money orienting web, the info here is very useful.

I am definitely bookmarking it as well as sharing it with my friends.

:)

megrenteend of AL 3:41AM November 29, 2009

Obama had been ahead of McCain in the polls until Palin. McCain's drop in the polls started after Palin's interview with Katie Couric. In addition, several Republicans started bashing Palin.

McCain's debate performance also lost him many voters, especially the independent voter.

McCain's reaction to the economic crisis hastened his fall in the polls, but Palin and his debate performances was enough to keep him from winning.

Julie of CO 4:52PM January 05, 2009

Our Obligatory Objections Over Obama's Obvious Obscene Obsessions.

By: Jordan C. Fan, Prophet Of Environment.

When Great Depression II Begins, Civil War II Also Starts. Americans love of sportmanship may have caused the nations final demise. Americans' sportsman mentality require destroying its opponents completely without giving it a chance for escape or recover. This time the Northern States are going too far which George W. Bush dare not try during his administration. Such casting our of Republicans in Congress will result in Civil War II. It s especially extremely dangerous for Obama to identify himself with A. Lincoln like using to his bible to to swear in as president. Everyone knows that Lincoln started the American Civil War I, in order to match his accomplishment Obama must and will start Civil War II. The Blagojevich case has already shown the harassing and lawlessness nature the future Obama administration which is extremely likely to cause great internal conflicts in the United States. In case of the It is incomprehensible why a person could wish for something so unlucky. As all of you have already know that Obama has already caused the American Great Depression II. In the case of the Kennedy Family, it is even worse. Joseph Kennedy Sr. had caused the Great Depression I by speculating and short-selling in Wall Street during the 1920-30s initiating the stock crashes. Today, by supporting Obama, the Kennedys have caused Great Depression II. How much more evil and damages can a family accomplish?

Jordan C. Fan, Prophet Of Environment 10:23AM January 04, 2009

Michael Barone

Michael Barone

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

advertisement

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Republicans Can't Forget the Economy During Obama Scandals

Scandals provide good fodder for the GOP, but it can't forget about fixing unemployment.

Amidst Obama Scandals, Republicans Prepare a New Debt Ceiling Hostage

Republicans are preparing to take the debt ceiling hostage…again.

Benghazi, IRS and AP Scandals Reveal a Clueless President

The recent slew of scandals reveals an administration either incompetent or malicious.

The IRS Scandal Is About Budget Cuts, Not the Tea Party

Cutting the tax collection budget hurts everyone in the long-run.

Obama 'Going Bulworth' Wouldn't Give Him Power Over Republicans

Both Congress and presidents overestimate the power of the Oval Office.

Bureaucracy Keeps Adopted Children Stuck in International Limbo

The U.S. needs to do more to ease the international adoption process.

The Real Scandal Behind the Benghazi Emails and Attacks

The GOP focuses on talking points while ignoring dangerous security budget cuts.

House Republicans Waste Time With Obamacare Repeal Vote

Why is the House bothering to repeal Obamacare yet again?

advertisement