John McCain Needs to Reiterate Democrats' Failures on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

October 8, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (13)

In the second presidential debate last night, John McCain finally attacked the Democrats and Obama for opposing tighter regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac—I have been puzzled why he has not been doing this for the past three weeks—and presented something like the mortgage proposals advanced by conservative economist Martin Feldstein and Lawrence Lindsey. To be effective, such themes must be reiterated again and again.

It's not clear that McCain has the discipline to do this in campaigning or the funds to do it in television ads. Obama has been outspending him something like 3 to 1 in target states over the past few weeks. Obama's message has been that the economy is messed up because of eight years of George W. Bush policies and deregulation and that McCain would provide more of the same. That seems to me to be a flawed argument in several ways, but it appears to be having an effect. I have noted earlier in the cycle that TV advertising had not seemed to be as effective as in previous cycles. Obama heavily outspent Hillary Clinton in Ohio, Texas, and Pennsylvania but didn't move the numbers much; Clinton won all three. But now, as the public is in search of a narrative in unprecedented times, Obama's advertising does appear to be having the intended effect. It's hard to explain his lead in current polls in Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida in any other way.

Tags:
debates,
Freddie Mac,
2008 presidential election,
John McCain,
Fannie Mae,
campaigns

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

This is all that I have to say:

Hagel's S. 190 [109th]: Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005.

McCain would not support the bill when it was introduced in January 2005. McCain waited!

On May 25, 2006, John McCain spoke forcefully on behalf of S.190 [109th] Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005. On this day, Obama was introducing S.3159: a bill to suspend temporarily the duty on gibberellic acid.

The US Senate Banking committee that killed the bill was chaired by Republican Richard Shelby. The committee had 11 Republican and 9 Democrat members. A simple majority vote when at least half the committee members were present was required before the bill could be sent to the full Senate for debate and vote.

Nothing the 9 Democrats working together could stop the 11 Republicans from sending the bill to the full Senate, if the Republicans wanted to send the bill to the full Senate.

In addition to Sen Hagel sponsoring the bill, co-sponsors Sen Dole and Sen Sununu were also on the US Senate Banking Committee, so they had 3 votes to send the bill to the full Senate without any help.

The ranking Democrat on the Banking Committee was Paul Sarbanes.

108th Congress: Republicans 51 seats, Democrats 44, Independents 1

Both sides are playing us!

Anthony of MD 3:10PM February 26, 2009

Again our free press is in crisis as columnists repeat the mud slinging and lies of candidates. What happened to the virtues of the free press - I guess they've been bought off for partisan purposes.

To repeat the lies suggesting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have caused this current credit crisis, while any good reporter or media practitioner should know that the financial derivatives created to avoid regulations are at the heart of the crisis. Still banks don't know the depth that these fraudulent assets are in the balance sheets of financial institutions, thus the continued misgivings to extend credit to other banks.

Unfortunately slimeballs in Mccain campaign have decided to put a false scapegoat out there so they can try to smear it on the democrats. Worse yet is when partisan commentators repeat the garbage, what they fully know is lies meant to deceive.

Paul of WA 8:43PM October 16, 2008

Mr. Baron'e suggestion of blaming Democrats is unsustainable, as McCain's closest advisers were paid lobbyists of Fannie and Freddie throughout this decade including this election year! Obama's ads have driven home that inconvenient truth.

Marylen of NY 9:41PM October 10, 2008

Michael Barone

Michael Barone

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

advertisement

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

advertisement