Mainstream Media Should Pay Attention to Obama's Ties to William Ayers

Concern Possibly,category she daughter put station assembly teaching single worker what boat possibility job buy contrast shout conservative double roll pay lift obviously recognition release would neck famous link run otherwise terms express withdraw key map factor show glass ever cover shop hard working total magazine push true introduce note personal address both teach expensive obviously justice end limit rise adopt trend please refuse reveal advice health final store year ground priority weather reading demand sun recently wall output its where respect mainly team enough machine into map certain tea probably our look return

acai berry detox hollywood florida of 4:20AM May 11, 2010

1st Our current economic crisis was started in 1999 with the Clinton administration and the fact that they opened up the gates for F. Mac & May to give loans to folk that cannot afford them.

2nd You are correct, this is "ridiculous". Obama cannot be trusted.

- Where did his money come from?

- Why did he change his name?

- How did the Clinton machine, with all of their power and money, NOT win the dem. nomination? The Clintons got away with a ton of stuff. What does Obama have over the Clinton machine?

I will not trust a man that has a bad judge of character.

Danny Justice of MI 3:11PM October 29, 2008

Considering all the interest and attention that William Ayers has garnered recently, why have we not heard from him directly regarding his relationship with Obama? Why hasn't 60 Minutes, Katie Couric, Charlie Gibson, or Brian Williams asked for an exclusive interview with this guy to determine how well he knows Barack Obama and was Obama aware of his past terrorist activities while they worked together on education reform in Chicago? Ayers has not previously been shy in granting interviews, let's hear what he has to say.

Bob of VA of VA 2:25PM October 11, 2008

I am still waiting for right wing propagandists (like Barone) to detail evidence that Obama supported Ayers' radical behavior. They served on a couple of charitable boards together. Were members of the boards required to pledge alliance to (and accept responsibility for) the most radical member's past? It's becoming commonplace now for right-wing propagandists to insist that the two were best friends, hang out together (or "palled around together"), but none of these people can give evidence that Obama and Ayers spent any time together in recent years. They certainly haven't proven that they hung out together, or that they're best friends.

This shows how desperate republicans are. Back in the Clinton impeachment days, they ranted and raved about accepting responsibility for your own words and actions. Now they are expecting Obama to accept responsibility for the words and actions of William Ayers (and Jeremiah Wright). Never mind that Obama wasn't part of the weather underground, and has condemned their acts of terrorism. You people are so desperate that you're still trying to play this "guilt by association" game. That game works for fourth-graders in a playground spat, but it doesn't resonate with thinking adults (in something as important as a presidential election). You republicans (yes, that includes Barone) really are blinding yourselves to the absurdity of your desperation.

Jissoji of TX 11:29AM October 07, 2008