Bill Clinton a Little Slippery on Whether Obama Is Ready to Be Commander-in-Chief

August 28, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (14)

The 42nd president of the United States spoke to the 46th Democratic National Convention for 20 minutes last night, 10 minutes more than his allotted time. But did anyone expect Bill Clinton to conclude on time? And did anyone in the crowd, even those few in the press corps firmly opposed to the Democrats, want it to end more than a minute or two earlier (as they wanted his 1988 nominating speech for Michael Dukakis to end 20 minutes earlier)? Bill Clinton was obviously having glorious fun in the spotlight for his sixth Democratic National Convention. And, more than Hillary Clinton in her speech the night before, he did the job that the Obamaites wanted the Clintons to do. Even so, when you examine his exuberant speech and try to scoop up the substance, you end up (mostly) with quicksilver.

He who frames the issues tends to determine the outcome of the election. Here's how Bill Clinton framed the issues: The next president's task is "to rebuild the American Dream and restore America's standing in the world." And John McCain, Clinton said, after hailing him for his heroism, "still embraces the extreme philosophy which has defined his party for more than 25 years, a philosophy we never had a real chance to see in action until 2001, when the Republicans finally gained control of both the White House and Congress." That is the philosophy, presumably, of the unnamed Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, and George Bush. (My U.S. News colleague Liz Halloran pointed out to me that Clinton never mentioned Bush 43 by name; I noticed, as I reviewed the text after Clinton spoke, that he doesn't mention the name of any Republican at all.)

Clinton is capable of providing a thoughtful analysis of domestic policy, but this was not the time and place for that. Instead, he presented a selective litany of statistics, as politicians routinely do, to show that things were wonderful when his side was in office and awful when the other side is in. And then he said simply, "America can do better than that. And Barack Obama will." Convention watchers still await anything more than a cursory description of Obama's domestic policies. Perhaps we'll get more in Invesco Field.

Clinton's assigned subject was national security, and he spent most of his time on it. He credits Obama with "a remarkable ability to inspire people," "a clear grasp of foreign policy, and a firm commitment to repair our badly strained military." His background gives him "a unique capacity" to "restore our leadership in an ever more interdependent world." Clinton applauds Obama for selecting Joe Biden for vice president (a choice he didn't make himself) and then in effect concedes that Biden brings qualities to the administration that Obama lacks. "With Joe Biden's experience and wisdom, supporting Barack Obama's proven understanding, insight, and good instincts, America will have the national security leadership we need."

And what will they do?

"Work for an America with more partners and fewer adversaries." Of course every president wants to do that. And the current president has recently found himself facing friendlier foreign leaders in France, Italy, and Germany than he did a few years ago.

"Rebuild our frayed alliance and revitalize . . . international institutions." I'm not sure our alliances are "frayed." In fact, intelligence cooperation with France, to take a notable example, has been consistently good since Sept. 11, 2001. As for aid in military efforts, with the exception of Britain and France, few nations have significant out-of-area military capacities. Some, from Australia to Estonia, punch above their demographic weight. But others, like Germany, impose rules of engagement that prevent their troops from fighting. Barack Obama in his Berlin speech called for such countries to do more; that was one part of the speech which didn't get much praise from the Europeans.

"Put us back in the forefront of the world's fight to reduce nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and to stop global warming." We are in the forefront of that fight—Obama praises the long-ongoing Nunn-Lugar programs—and the international organizations Clinton praised are in some cases more hindrance than help. As for global warming, carbon emissions have declined more in the United States than in most of the European nations that ratified the Kyoto Protocol.

"Will continue and enhance our nation's global leadership in . . . the fight against AIDS, TB and malaria." The word "enhance" is a handsome tribute (which probably went right over the heads of almost everyone in the audience) to the work George W. Bush has done in vastly expanding these programs beyond what was done in the Clinton administration.

"He will choose diplomacy first and military force as a last resort." This repeats the canard that the Bush administration rushed to war in Iraq; in fact there was much diplomacy, in the United Nations and beyond, and more than 30 allies joined us in enforcing the 18 U.N. resolutions that Iraq defied. I suppose you could argue that he should have waited longer and that therefore taking military action in March was not a "last resort."

Altogether, it's a list of things every president would do or of things that the current and previous administrations have tried to do and found that others will not cooperate.

As I was listening to Clinton's speech, without the text, I felt that he was saying that Obama was capable of being commander in chief. He does say, in the middle of the speech, "Barack Obama is ready to be president of the United States." But he's a little more slippery on commander in chief. He notes that, in 1992, he won when "the Republicans said I was too young and inexperienced to be commander in chief. Sound familiar? It didn't work in 1992, because we were on the right side of history. And it won't work in 2008, because Barack Obama is on the right side of history."

The crowd loved just about all of it, needless to say. Bill Clinton is a master of seeming to say what he doesn't exactly say.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Democratic National Convention,
2008 presidential election,
Bill Clinton,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I am a diehard Hillary Rodham Clinton voters and I am VOTING for John McCain and Sarah Palin in November.

Barack Hussein Obama has been disrespectful to Hillary Rodham Clinton over-and-over. Out of Barack Hussein Obama's own mouth he stated "Hillary Rodham Clinton would be on anyone's short list for Vice President." THEN, Barack Hussein Obama NEVER contacted Hillary Rodham Clinton to be Vice President. In fact, Barack Hussein Obama has been disrespectful to the entire Clinton family.

Wonder what happened to Barack Hussein Obama? Did Michelle Obama make the Vice President decision for Barack Hussein Obama?

That old saying - "WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND" is very true Barack Hussein Obama. Barack Hussein Obama is just into himself and doesn't even know that Hillary Rodham Clinton made Obama what he is today.....Obama has NO EXPERIENCE AT ALL, but Obama does have a pastor and memtor of twenty years that shouts "HATE AMERICA" "HATE WHITES". REALLY, can a presidential candidate with that truly be committed to America without his own agenda?

I don't think so.

With John McCain and his Vice President - Sarah Palin...it is front and center that AMERICA MUST HAVE "TRUE CHANGE" "TRUE HOPE" for all people.

It is very easy to see Hillary Rodham Clinton within SARAH PALIN...the American Dream. I do believe that John McCain made the right decision for America...Sarah Palin is honest and gives America "TRUE HOPE FOR CHANGE" that will count in White House this election.

GO------JOHN MCCAIN / SARAH PALIN!!!!!

GO------JOHN MCCAIN / SARAH PALIN!!!!!

GO------JOHN MCCAIN / SARAH PALIN!!!!!

YOU HAVE MY - HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON VOTE!!!!!

YOU HAVE MY - HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON VOTE!!!!!

AMERICA'S TRUE HOPE FOR CHANGE

JOHN MCCAIN / SARAH PALIN

Blondshag of SC 1:00PM August 30, 2008

I am a diehard Hillary Rodham Clinton voters and I am VOTING for John McCain and Sarah Palin in November.

Barack Hussein Obama has been disrespectful to Hillary Rodham Clinton over-and-over. Out of Barack Hussein Obama's own mouth he stated "Hillary Rodham Clinton would be on anyone's short list for Vice President." THEN, Barack Hussein Obama NEVER contacted Hillary Rodham Clinton to be Vice President. In fact, Barack Hussein Obama has been disrespectful to the entire Clinton family.

Wonder what happened to Barack Hussein Obama? Did Michelle Obama make the Vice President decision for Barack Hussein Obama?

That old saying - "WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND" is very true Barack Hussein Obama. Barack Hussein Obama is just into himself and doesn't even know that Hillary Rodham Clinton made Obama what he is today.....Obama has NO EXPERIENCE AT ALL, but Obama does have a pastor and memtor of twenty years that shouts "HATE AMERICA" "HATE WHITES". REALLY, can a presidential candidate with that truly be committed to America without his own agenda?

I don't think so.

With John McCain and his Vice President - Sarah Palin...it is front and center that AMERICA MUST HAVE "TRUE CHANGE" "TRUE HOPE" for all people.

It is very easy to see Hillary Rodham Clinton within SARAH PALIN...the American Dream. I do believe that John McCain made the right decision for America...Sarah Palin is honest and gives America "TRUE HOPE FOR CHANGE" that will count in White House this election.

GO------JOHN MCCAIN / SARAH PALIN!!!!!

GO------JOHN MCCAIN / SARAH PALIN!!!!!

GO------JOHN MCCAIN / SARAH PALIN!!!!!

YOU HAVE MY - HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON VOTE!!!!!

YOU HAVE MY - HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON VOTE!!!!!

AMERICA'S TRUE HOPE FOR CHANGE

JOHN MCCAIN / SARAH PALIN

Blondshag of SC 1:00PM August 30, 2008

WISH WE COULD ELECT PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON AGAIN!

DEMOCRATES GOT THIS SO WRONG THIS ELECTION YEAR!

Obama screwed up, just as expected and predicted…

Obama, Pelosi and Dean are why we changed our party affiliation to “ Independent” When all the benefits are with the Democrats this election, they selected the wrong candidate by a mile, next Obama's selection of Biden who got 9000 votes in primaries compared to Hillary’s 18 million, gained him no "bounce" in the polls. Infact it underlines his inexperienced to lead and make a decision based on what’s best for the country and not just for him and Michelle. What would Clinton of added to the ticket? Apparently a WIN. If Clinton were at the top of the ticket, polls now show she would be leading McCain by eight pts even after almost 3 months after ending her campaign. Clinton herself now enjoys 87 percent approval ratings among Democrats, Gallup reported, and three out of four Democrats would like to see her as president and be a major-party spokeswoman over the next four years. Clinton's supporters lukewarm in their support for Obama mainly because of the sexist way his camp treated Senator and President Clinton. David Axelrod said Obama doesn’t need her supporters, then why are they begging for them now? He continues to fall in the polls daily. He got an average 2pt bump in polls after DNC convention when history shows most get 10-15pt bump.

SIMPLY, “BUYERS REMORSE”

Tabloid Cable media especially CNN ( Obama hired help)& MSNBC has frankly put the security of our great country at risk with an Obama coronation. It’s extremely concerning that so many Americans could care less about who their candidate really is?? He’s ½ black, lets make it happen???? Simply amazing and frankly scary.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m89m0pC_bpY

Obama has shown this entire season he can be pushed and told exactly what to do just what we can’t have in the White House and remember grandma; he will throw anyone under a buss if it helps politically so; WATCH OUT MICHELLE!

gail of PA 8:43AM August 30, 2008

Michael Barone

Michael Barone

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

advertisement

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

God Bless America and the Boy Scouts

The Fund does the right thing by pushing the Boy Scouts to lift its ban on gay members.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

advertisement