One More Look at New Hampshire

January 10, 2008 RSS Feed Print

I have already remarked on the eerie resemblance between the constituencies backing Al Gore 2000/Hillary Clinton 2008 and Bill Bradley 2000/Barack Obama 2008. Now, with the final returns in from New Hampshire, we can compare the 2008 results with those of 2000. Because there are more than 250 cities and towns in New Hampshire, I'll do the comparison by counties, although county lines break up various metro areas. I'm ordering the counties by percentage for Gore in 2000 and showing the Bradley 2000, Clinton 2008, and Obama 2008 percentages and the percentage leads of the Gore/Clinton candidates.

  Gore Bradley   Clinton Obama  
Statewide 49.7 45.6 +4.1 39.1 36.5 +2.6
Coos 57.2 35.3 +21.9 42.3 28.6 +13.7
Strafford 52.2 42.8 +9.4 40.7 34.1 +6.6
Hillsborough 51.7 44.1 +7.6 42.0 34.8 +7.2
Merrimack 50.5 44.9 +5.6 35.9 37.9 -2.0
Rockingham 48.8 45.9 +2.9 42.0 34.7 +7.3
Cheshire 48.4 46.4 +2.0 33.8 39.2 -5.4
Sullivan 48.3 44.3 +4.0 35.8 39.8 -4.0
Belknap 47.5 45.4 +2.1 37.3 37.0 +0.3
Carroll 45.8 49.7 -3.9 34.4 40.1 -5.7
Grafton 39.8 55.4 -15.6 31.7 45.3 -13.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The continuity here is not perfect, but it's a lot higher than you usually see in primaries. It's as if there were two well-established factions in the Democratic Party. It's especially striking, since Democratic turnout in New Hampshire increased by 87 percent between 2000 and 2008, from 154,000 to 287,000.

The good news is that the Gore-Bradley race provides a good benchmark for the Clinton-Obama race. The bad news is that Bradley dropped out of the race after the New Hampshire primary. Under that year's schedule, there was an interval of five weeks—weeks, not days—between New Hampshire and the next contest, and Bradley, despite losing by only 4 points in New Hampshire, could not keep his campaign alive for that period of time. So there are no future contests in which we can forecast the outcome by looking back at the 2000 race.

Tags:
candidates,
Barack Obama,
New Hampshire primaries,
primaries,
democratic party,
Hillary Clinton

Reader Comments

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Michael Barone

Michael Barone

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

It's Too Early to Write Off Either Rick Santorum or Mitt Romney

Barack Obama and John McCain traveled unlikely paths to their nominations in 2008.

On Contraception Mandate, Obama Blunders Into the Culture Wars

Obama's contraception "compromise" is a gimmick that voters will see right through.

Why Mitt Romney Can't Sell Himself to Conservatives

Voters want to know if they can trust Mitt Romney.

Americans Deserve Political Freedom from the Catholic Church

Church leaders could not have been less gracious towards Obama's surrender on contraception.

What the Catholic Contraceptive Debate Is Really About

Today's debates about contraception and inequality are intertwined in that the bring up the question of morality.

Why the Catholic Contraception Controversy Is a Phony Battle

The Catholic Church is asking the Obama administration to do something it cannot do itself: limit birth control use.

Obama’s Contraceptive 'Compromise' Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

The so-called "accommodation" on contraceptive coverage reinforces the administration's commitment to its pro-choice agenda.

On Women in Combat, Rick Santorum Insults Military Men

To suggest that the men in our armed forces cannot control their emotions is a real slap at the professionals who wear the uniform.