One More Look at New Hampshire

January 10, 2008 RSS Feed Print

I have already remarked on the eerie resemblance between the constituencies backing Al Gore 2000/Hillary Clinton 2008 and Bill Bradley 2000/Barack Obama 2008. Now, with the final returns in from New Hampshire, we can compare the 2008 results with those of 2000. Because there are more than 250 cities and towns in New Hampshire, I'll do the comparison by counties, although county lines break up various metro areas. I'm ordering the counties by percentage for Gore in 2000 and showing the Bradley 2000, Clinton 2008, and Obama 2008 percentages and the percentage leads of the Gore/Clinton candidates.

  Gore Bradley   Clinton Obama  
Statewide 49.7 45.6 +4.1 39.1 36.5 +2.6
Coos 57.2 35.3 +21.9 42.3 28.6 +13.7
Strafford 52.2 42.8 +9.4 40.7 34.1 +6.6
Hillsborough 51.7 44.1 +7.6 42.0 34.8 +7.2
Merrimack 50.5 44.9 +5.6 35.9 37.9 -2.0
Rockingham 48.8 45.9 +2.9 42.0 34.7 +7.3
Cheshire 48.4 46.4 +2.0 33.8 39.2 -5.4
Sullivan 48.3 44.3 +4.0 35.8 39.8 -4.0
Belknap 47.5 45.4 +2.1 37.3 37.0 +0.3
Carroll 45.8 49.7 -3.9 34.4 40.1 -5.7
Grafton 39.8 55.4 -15.6 31.7 45.3 -13.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The continuity here is not perfect, but it's a lot higher than you usually see in primaries. It's as if there were two well-established factions in the Democratic Party. It's especially striking, since Democratic turnout in New Hampshire increased by 87 percent between 2000 and 2008, from 154,000 to 287,000.

The good news is that the Gore-Bradley race provides a good benchmark for the Clinton-Obama race. The bad news is that Bradley dropped out of the race after the New Hampshire primary. Under that year's schedule, there was an interval of five weeks—weeks, not days—between New Hampshire and the next contest, and Bradley, despite losing by only 4 points in New Hampshire, could not keep his campaign alive for that period of time. So there are no future contests in which we can forecast the outcome by looking back at the 2000 race.

Tags:
candidates,
democratic party,
Barack Obama,
Hillary Clinton,
New Hampshire primaries,
primaries

Reader Comments

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Michael Barone

Michael Barone

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Scott Walker's Union Fight Helps Mitt Romney Against Barack Obama

The Wisconsin governor refuses to back down from his opposition to collective bargaining.

Why Is It Only Women Who Need 'Informing' on Reproductive Health?

Men's sexual behavior could also use some "controlling."