For U.S. Carmakers, the End of an Era

October 3, 2007 RSS Feed Print

My U.S. News column this week is on how the General Motors-United Auto Workers contract marks the end of an era. In it I quoted William Serrin's 1973 book, The Company and the Union. Serrin is critical, I think harshly critical, of the UAW for not asking enough from the company and for not seeking to improve working conditions. He assumed, as did just about everyone, that the structure of the auto industry would continue unchanged indefinitely; he did not take seriously the possibility that foreign companies would sell, as they do today, half the cars sold in the United States. But I was unable to find a particular quote that I wanted on this point in the hardcover edition of the book. Now I have the 1974 paperback edition, with a long epilogue. Here are the quotes, from Pages 310 and 311:

"Even a balanced transportation system [Serrin wanted lots more mass transit] will depend in large measure upon individual vehicles of some sort, and it is logical to assume that GM, Ford, Chrysler, and American Motors will build them. Even if one disagrees [as Serrin did] with the philosophy of men like Richard Gerstenberg of General Motors Corporation, Henry Ford II and Lee Iacocca for Ford Motor Company, and Lynn Townsend of Chrysler Corporation, one should not doubt the business abilities of these men or their subordinates. They do not intend to see their corporations become extinct; it is vacuous to think that the corporations will become extinct."

In the 34 years since these words appeared, each of the Big Three has been threatened with bankruptcy, while American Motors is no longer a factor. Serrin is a good writer and a good reporter but, like almost everyone else concerned with the auto industry in the 1970s, a poor prophet.

Tags:
cars,
Chrysler,
Ford,
General Motors

Reader Comments

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Michael Barone

Michael Barone

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Barack Obama's $5.6 Billion Valentine's Day Tax

An Americans for Tax Reform report shows the federal tax burden on love.

It's Too Early to Write Off Either Rick Santorum or Mitt Romney

Barack Obama and John McCain traveled unlikely paths to their nominations in 2008.

On Contraception Mandate, Obama Blunders Into the Culture Wars

Obama's contraception "compromise" is a gimmick that voters will see right through.

Why Mitt Romney Can't Sell Himself to Conservatives

Voters want to know if they can trust Mitt Romney.

Americans Deserve Political Freedom from the Catholic Church

Church leaders could not have been less gracious towards Obama's surrender on contraception.

What the Catholic Contraceptive Debate Is Really About

Today's debates about contraception and inequality are intertwined in that the bring up the question of morality.

Why the Catholic Contraception Controversy Is a Phony Battle

The Catholic Church is asking the Obama administration to do something it cannot do itself: limit birth control use.

Obama’s Contraceptive 'Compromise' Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

The so-called "accommodation" on contraceptive coverage reinforces the administration's commitment to its pro-choice agenda.