Recovering Damages From Iran

September 4, 2007 RSS Feed Print

On Friday, Judge Royce Lamberth is due to announce the amount of damages owed by the government of Iran to the relatives of the victims of the terrorist attack on the Marine Corps barracks in Lebanon in 1983. The amount will be set by a special master appointed by Judge Lamberth. The amount is expected to be more than $2 billion.

This announcement should be a reminder that, whether or not we consider ourselves to be at war with the mullah regime of Iran, it has been waging war against us for a long time. Michael Ledeen puts it in perspective on National Review Online and in his latest book, The Iranian Time Bomb: The Mullah Zealots' Quest for Destruction, whose publication date is today.

The Iranian regime was found financially liable for the damages to the marines' relatives more than four years ago, in May 2003, and it's evidently taken a long time to calculate the amount of the damages. And it could take longer—actually, forever—for the plaintiffs to collect. The courts have held that damages can be assessed against terrorist-sponsoring states' assets only if those assets are under their day-to-day managerial control. Iranian assets sequestered by the U.S. government don't meet that test. To get around that, Sens. Frank Lautenberg and Arlen Specter are sponsoring an amendment to the Foreign Sovereignty Immunities Act of 1996, which allowed U.S. victims of terrorism to sue terrorist states. Their amendment would allow collection of damages from assets beneficially owned by the terrorist-sponsoring government, which would include assets sequestered by the United States. This bill has bipartisan support in the Senate and, I am told, will also be introduced in the House. The focus of attention next week will surely be on the testimony of Gen. David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker on the situation of Iraq, as I noted in my U.S. News column this week.

But the war on Islamist terrorism has many fronts, and we have many opportunities to move forward. One way to do so would be for Congress to pass the bill sponsored by Senators Lautenberg and Specter.

Tags:
Arlen Specter,
Frank Lautenberg,
Lebanon,
military,
national security terrorism and the military,
Iran,
terrorism,
military bases,
Marine Corps

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Iam a member of the famlies that are in concren about the status of the Bill s.1944 that President bush sign off on sometime last year.

Alaina m. Richardson of NY 10:09PM July 14, 2008

Michael Barone

Michael Barone

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Barack Obama's $5.6 Billion Valentine's Day Tax

An Americans for Tax Reform report shows the federal tax burden on love.

It's Too Early to Write Off Either Rick Santorum or Mitt Romney

Barack Obama and John McCain traveled unlikely paths to their nominations in 2008.

On Contraception Mandate, Obama Blunders Into the Culture Wars

Obama's contraception "compromise" is a gimmick that voters will see right through.

Why Mitt Romney Can't Sell Himself to Conservatives

Voters want to know if they can trust Mitt Romney.

Americans Deserve Political Freedom from the Catholic Church

Church leaders could not have been less gracious towards Obama's surrender on contraception.

What the Catholic Contraceptive Debate Is Really About

Today's debates about contraception and inequality are intertwined in that the bring up the question of morality.

Why the Catholic Contraception Controversy Is a Phony Battle

The Catholic Church is asking the Obama administration to do something it cannot do itself: limit birth control use.

Obama’s Contraceptive 'Compromise' Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

The so-called "accommodation" on contraceptive coverage reinforces the administration's commitment to its pro-choice agenda.