A Warning to Democrats

February 15, 2007 RSS Feed Print

Lawrence Haas, a former aide to Al Gore, argues that Democrats may be hurt in the long run by their opposition to the surge in Iraq. He looks back on history and notes that after Democrats pulled the plug on Vietnam, and after the four years of the Carter administration, they were seen as weak on national security. Some Democrats in Congress in the 1980s tried to set a different course–including, interestingly, Haas's old boss Gore, who is now as full-throated an opponent of our policy in Iraq as anyone. You can make a good case from today's public opinion polls for the course of action the Democrats are now pursuing. But poll numbers are not etched in stone. A stance that seems popular today might not prove popular in the long run.

Moqtada Al-Sadr Flees to Iran

An Iraqi government official confirms the report by the U.S. military that Moqtada al-Sadr has fled to Iran; Sadr's people have been denying it, but they haven't produced evidence Sadr is still in Iraq. The Guardian reports that the Mahdi army command structure has gone there too. Evidently, Sadr wanted to get out of town before the surge began. As Ralph Peters points out in this acerbic column, "Mookie" can and should be depicted as a coward and an Iranian stooge–and his flight should be taken as evidence that the surge is having some positive effect.

Here's some additional evidence that it is.

Afghanistan

George W. Bush delivered a speech on Afghanistan at an American Enterprise Institute event this morning; I was fortunate to be seated in the front row. He sounded forceful and unfazed by the opposition he's getting from the Democratic Congress. He noted that the Taliban forces there went on the offensive in 2006 and can be expected to do so again when the snows melt. He called for increasing the number of Afghan national police and more than doubling the size of the Afghan army. He noted that many NATO countries will send in additional troops and said "allies must lift restrictions on the forces they do provide so NATO commanders have the flexibility they need to defeat the enemy wherever the enemy may make a stand." He didn't say he was sending in more American troops, but it does sound like there will be something in the nature of a surge.

Tags:
Al Gore,
George W. Bush,
Afghanistan,
Iraq war (2003-2011)

Reader Comments

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Michael Barone

Michael Barone

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Scott Walker's Union Fight Helps Mitt Romney Against Barack Obama

The Wisconsin governor refuses to back down from his opposition to collective bargaining.

Why Is It Only Women Who Need 'Informing' on Reproductive Health?

Men's sexual behavior could also use some "controlling."