Warren Buffett's philanthropy

June 26, 2006 RSS Feed Print

The brilliant investor Warren Buffett has decided to leave the vast bulk of his fortune to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

The Washington Post has the story, unsurprisingly, since both Buffett and Melinda Gates serve on the Post company board of directors. Buffett has long made it clear that he intended to leave his children only a very small percentage of his wealth, more than 99 percent of which is in Berkshire Hathaway stock—some $44 billion currently. (Disclosure: I own one share of Berkshire Hathaway.) The Gates Foundation currently has about $30 billion, donated by the Gateses from their Microsoft stock.

I suppose some people may worry about such a large bloc of capital being held by a single foundation. But from what I have seen and reported on in this blog, the Gateses seem to be extremely thoughtful and creative philanthropists. They're concentrated on world health and U.S. education—both areas in need of serious improvement. Buffett, in contrast, evidently has no great philanthropic projects in mind.

Until now, Buffett has given little to philanthropy, amassing the wealth and leaving the work of philanthropy to others so his money could compound at a higher rate, he told Fortune. He said he had always planned to have his wife oversee his charitable giving after his death. But after she died – and because he saw an opportunity to invest in an existing, well-respected foundation run by two "ungodly bright" people – he changed plans to start giving it away this year, he told the magazine.

His philanthropic strategy seems to mirror his investment strategy: Berkshire Hathaway buys whole businesses and big blocks of shares in public companies in which it has confidence and lets existing management continue to run them. Now he's leaving the bulk of his wealth to be given away by the Gateses.

I remember reading somewhere that Buffett intended to leave all his money to a foundation working for population control. http://www.cirtl.org/buffett.htm That would have been extremely foolish: The dangerous specter before the world now is not overpopulation but underpopulation, as documented in Ben Wattenberg's Fewer: How the New Demography of Depopulation Will Shape Our Future, and Philip Longman's The Empty Cradle: How Falling Birthrates Threaten World Prosperity and What to Do About It. Perhaps these books helped to persuade Buffett to give up on population control, in which case Ben and Phil have a done great service to the world.

I give great credit to Bill and Melinda Gates for taking personal charge of their foundation and not just turning their money over to left-wing foundation apparatchiks but rather thinking creatively about how it should be spent. And I give great credit to Warren Buffett for deciding not to turn his money over to such apparatchiks but to give it to the Gateses to superintend.

Reader Comments Read all comments (23)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Perfect work!

name of 11:22PM April 25, 2010

Beautiful site!

nrma car insurance quote of 3:51AM April 09, 2010

Incredible site!

free credit report without fees of 6:00PM April 02, 2010

Michael Barone

Michael Barone

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Scott Walker's Union Fight Helps Mitt Romney Against Barack Obama

The Wisconsin governor refuses to back down from his opposition to collective bargaining.

Why Is It Only Women Who Need 'Informing' on Reproductive Health?

Men's sexual behavior could also use some "controlling."