What the Italian elections mean

April 12, 2006 RSS Feed Print

My blog entry on the Italian elections was written when it looked like there was a good chance that the center right would have a majority in the Senate and might still get a majority in the Chamber of Deputies.

Now the results show that the center left will have a supermajority in the Chamber (thanks to the electoral provision Silvio Berlusconi rammed through for the benefit of his center-right coalition) but will control the Senate by only a 158-to-156 margin, with 1 Independent. Since the Senate gets to vote on all legislation, that means the center left is likely to lose a vote of confidence there sooner or later—probably sooner. That could easily lead to new elections, perhaps as early as this fall (Italians resent it when parties force elections in bad weather). So the Prodi government is likely to be short-lived and ineffective.

Of course that's only part of the bad news for Europe. The Chirac-Villepin surrender on the employment law (like Chirac's surrender on a similar law and his disastrous call for a special election in 1995) have doomed France to more stagnation. It's hard to see how Nicholas Sarkozy could win in 2007 or how either a new right or a new left government can do anything that needs to be done to revive France's stagnant economy. And Germany's Grand Coalition government seems unlikely to address that country's economic stagnation effectively.

The good news in Europe is that the United Kingdom and Ireland are still more Anglospheric (or as the French say, Anglo-Saxon) than European and that small countries like the Netherlands and Denmark and former Communist countries like Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Slovenia have effective, intelligent governments. New Europe and the Anglosphere can show the way. But there's little sign, alas, that Old Europe is ready to follow.

Reader Comments

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Michael Barone

Michael Barone

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Barack Obama's $5.6 Billion Valentine's Day Tax

An Americans for Tax Reform report shows the federal tax burden on love.

It's Too Early to Write Off Either Rick Santorum or Mitt Romney

Barack Obama and John McCain traveled unlikely paths to their nominations in 2008.

On Contraception Mandate, Obama Blunders Into the Culture Wars

Obama's contraception "compromise" is a gimmick that voters will see right through.

Why Mitt Romney Can't Sell Himself to Conservatives

Voters want to know if they can trust Mitt Romney.

Americans Deserve Political Freedom from the Catholic Church

Church leaders could not have been less gracious towards Obama's surrender on contraception.

What the Catholic Contraceptive Debate Is Really About

Today's debates about contraception and inequality are intertwined in that the bring up the question of morality.

Why the Catholic Contraception Controversy Is a Phony Battle

The Catholic Church is asking the Obama administration to do something it cannot do itself: limit birth control use.

Obama’s Contraceptive 'Compromise' Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

The so-called "accommodation" on contraceptive coverage reinforces the administration's commitment to its pro-choice agenda.