The Washington Post on the Canadian election

January 30, 2006 RSS Feed Print

Here is a very tart Washington Post editorial on the Canadian election. As the Post points out, outgoing Liberal Prime Minister Paul Martin was the second Group of Eight head of government to play the anti-American card and lose an election anyway; the other was German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder. In its parting shot, the Post notes that Schroeder has taken a job with Russia's Gazprom and suggests that Martin might want to go to work for Venezuela's authoritarian demagogue, Hugo Chavez. Ouch.

As the Post notes, the anti-American card has not always been a loser: Schroeder won an election playing it in 2002, and Martin did so in 2004. Moreover, it's a stretch to say that the results in Germany and Canada reflect a decrease in anti-American and anti-George W. Bush feeling in those countries. Schroeder's party had signally failed to revive German's sluggish economy; Martin's party was riddled with monumental corruption. The parties of the new heads of government, Angela Merkel and Stephen Harper, have only minorities in the Bundestag and House of Commons, and Merkel and Harper head coalition governments with uncertain life spans.

Still, the German and Canadian results confound the worldview of many of the Post's editorial page's readers, the view that under Bush the United States is hated by clear-thinking and high-minded foreigners everywhere. And the Post is good enough to recognize Schroeder's and Martin's desperate demagogy for what it is, or was. The notion that all opposition to Bush is worthy of admiration is held by many liberals and Democrats, suffused with Bush hatred as they are. The Post, keeping a cool eye on events, knows better.

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

tPZZhf

Qmfyizjr of WA 12:13AM July 14, 2009

Michael Barone

Michael Barone

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

On Contraception Mandate, Obama Blunders Into the Culture Wars

Obama's contraception "compromise" is a gimmick that voters will see right through.

Why Mitt Romney Can't Sell Himself to Conservatives

Voters want to know if they can trust Mitt Romney.

Americans Deserve Political Freedom from the Catholic Church

Church leaders could not have been less gracious towards Obama's surrender on contraception.

What the Catholic Contraceptive Debate Is Really About

Today's debates about contraception and inequality are intertwined in that the bring up the question of morality.

Why the Catholic Contraception Controversy Is a Phony Battle

The Catholic Church is asking the Obama administration to do something it cannot do itself: limit birth control use.

Obama’s Contraceptive 'Compromise' Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

The so-called "accommodation" on contraceptive coverage reinforces the administration's commitment to its pro-choice agenda.

On Women in Combat, Rick Santorum Insults Military Men

To suggest that the men in our armed forces cannot control their emotions is a real slap at the professionals who wear the uniform.

To Avoid a Failed February, Mitt Romney Needs a Big Idea

Mitt Romney needs a big idea to rouse enthusiasm for his campaign.