Opportunity lost: Head Start

November 15, 2005 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (1)

Back in the summer of 1966 I was working for the Oakland County Democratic Party. Congress had just passed Lyndon Johnson's Great Society legislation, and the question occurred to me: What Great Society bills would work positively for Democratic candidates? Only one answer jumped out: Head Start. Everybody seemed to agree that this preschool program was a great idea. That has been the conventional wisdom ever since, for 39 years.

Yet, like a lot of conventional wisdom, it's probably wrong. The American Enterprise Institute's Douglas Besharov released a report on the serious research on Head Start. Besharov is, I think it's fair to say, widely respected as a fair-minded and knowledgeable social scientist, not just by colleagues at AEI but also at institutions like the Brookings Institution. His report is depressing. Head Start helps poor children, but not very much. That verdict is shared by low-income parents, who are less likely to enroll their children in the program.

In the last Congress, Republicans tried to reform Head Start by adding academic content. They were stoutly resisted by the lobby of Head Start providers, which charged that the Republicans were trying to "trash" the program. I was on their E-mail lists, and in my recollection they contained no references to serious research and consisted mostly of unsupported invective.

Now, as Besharov notes, Republicans have thrown in the towel. Rather than reform Head Start they are prepared to expand it. They are surely wary of being labeled anti-poor by the Head Start providers' lobby, and they realize that their charges are likely to be taken at face value and reprinted uncritically by mainstream media. Rather than suffer political damage in an effort to help poor children, they'll take a pass.

I suppose I can't blame them, politically, but this really is a shame. And what is also a shame is that the Democrats are content to put the interests of the Head Start employees over the interests of poor children. Strong interests tend to trump strong arguments, as David Stockman argued 20 years ago. Public employees and the Democratic and Republican parties both come out winners; poor children are the losers. Shame on all the winners.

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

this is a cool news. Thank you.

buy strattera of MT 4:03PM December 13, 2009

Michael Barone

Michael Barone

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

advertisement

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Poll Finds Congress' Popularity Hits Historic Lows

Polling shows Congress has achieved historic unpopularity.

House GOP 20 Week Abortion Ban Vote Was a Waste of Time

Abortion should be left up to the states.

The NSA, Guns and Privacy in the Obama Administration

The Obama administration’s needs to take a long look in the mirror after revelations about government surveillance.

Polls Show American People Hate Almost Everything About Politics

The American people are breaking up with politics.

Do You Believe NSA Leaker Edward Snowden or President Obama?

Should we take the word of the NSA leaker or Obama?

Obama, Boehner and the GOP Crisis of Leadership

It’s tough for anyone to lead when some in the GOP seem committed to their own destruction.

Obamacare Opponents Have to Keep Pushing Repeal

The way to repeal Obamacare is to hasten its ugly results.

Can Obama's Berlin Speech Match John F. Kennedy's and Ronald Reagan's?

The two famous Berlin speeches almost never were.

advertisement