The great Seymour Martin Lipset

November 1, 2005 RSS Feed Print

Marty Lipset, one of the greatest political scientists in American history, has been disabled by a stroke. His work product over the course of nearly 50 years is immense: Punch in his name on Amazon.com and you get 3,321 results. Karlyn Bowman of the American Enterprise Institute observes, "In the introduction to the festschrift they edited in honor of Marty, Larry Diamond and Gary Marks wrote, 'Throughout this century, and especially since World War II, no theme has more preoccupied the fields of comparative politics and political sociology than the nature, conditions, and possibilities of democracy. And no political scientist or sociologist has contributed more to advancing our thinking about democracy in all its dimensions, both comparatively and in the United States—than Seymour Martin Lipset.

"Marty published 'Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy' in 1959 in the American Political Science Review. Diamond and Marks said, 'Very few contributions on this theme have proven more seminal and durable over time.' The article asserted a direct relationship between economic development and democracy.

"The Democratic Century, published in 2004 by the University of Oklahoma Press, is based on three presentations Marty gave at the University of Oklahoma Julian Rothbaum Distinguished Lecture Series, and was expanded by Marty and Jason Lakin. It combines social, cultural, economic, and institutional analyses to explain why democracy has succeeded in some countries and failed in others. The book revisits theories from Marty's earlier works, including Political Man and Agrarian Socialism, and offers an overview of democratic systems." 'Over the course of his career, Marty's subjects have included political extremism, the sources and consequences of class structure, the links between social cleavages, party systems, and voter alignments, the relations between values and institutions, the dynamics of public opinion and public confidence in instututions, the political and social origins of socialism, protest, ethnic prejudice, anti-Semitism, trade unions, and the contrast between Canada and the United States.' "

Marty, who is 83 years old, is also a warm and generous man, and was always ready to tutor a humble journalist and to regale him with stories and statistics old and new.

In his honor, a series of Seymour Martin Lipset Lectures on Democracy in the World has been endowed, sponsored by the National Endowment for Democracy and the University of Toronto Munk Centre for International Studies. The second such lecture will be delivered on November 2 at the Canadian Embassy in Washington, D.C. Political scientist Francis Fukuyama will speak on "Identity, Immigration, and Liberal Democracy." It's appropriate that these lectures be delivered at the Canadian Embassy. More than any other political scientist, Marty wrote on Canada and on the differences between Canada and the United States. I note that the only one of our 20th-century presidents who took a great interest in Canada was Franklin Roosevelt and that the only politician of our times who took a great interest in Canada was Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan. Marty Lipset belongs in their company, and not only because of their shared interest in Canada but as a student and lover of our democracy.

Reader Comments

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Michael Barone

Michael Barone

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Today

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Michael Barone is a senior writer for U.S.News & World Report and principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics. He has written for many publications—including the Economist and the New York Times.

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

It's Too Early to Write Off Either Rick Santorum or Mitt Romney

Barack Obama and John McCain traveled unlikely paths to their nominations in 2008.

On Contraception Mandate, Obama Blunders Into the Culture Wars

Obama's contraception "compromise" is a gimmick that voters will see right through.

Why Mitt Romney Can't Sell Himself to Conservatives

Voters want to know if they can trust Mitt Romney.

Americans Deserve Political Freedom from the Catholic Church

Church leaders could not have been less gracious towards Obama's surrender on contraception.

What the Catholic Contraceptive Debate Is Really About

Today's debates about contraception and inequality are intertwined in that the bring up the question of morality.

Why the Catholic Contraception Controversy Is a Phony Battle

The Catholic Church is asking the Obama administration to do something it cannot do itself: limit birth control use.

Obama’s Contraceptive 'Compromise' Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

The so-called "accommodation" on contraceptive coverage reinforces the administration's commitment to its pro-choice agenda.

On Women in Combat, Rick Santorum Insults Military Men

To suggest that the men in our armed forces cannot control their emotions is a real slap at the professionals who wear the uniform.