For GOP and the Debt Ceiling, Reality Crashes Into Campaign Rhetoric

July 1, 2011 RSS Feed Print

I’ve written a few posts in this space criticizing Republicans for their intransigence on the debt ceiling debate. It was fun at the time, but now I’ve been forced to take a hard look at myself, and I’m not sure I like what I see.

It’s Marc Thiessen, writing in the Washington Post, who sent me on this journey of self discovery. You see, according to Thiessen, many of us have entirely missed the real victims in the debt ceiling debate. It’s not you or me or the trillions of people across the globe who will suffer economic calamity if Republicans continue to stonewall, it’s the Republicans themselves. And it’s especially those newly elected Republicans who toddled onto the electoral stage full of innocence and light and made all sorts of campaign promises that now—gasp—they may not be able to fulfill.

[Vote now: Will there be a debt ceiling deal?]

“Republicans,” explains Marc Thiessen, “campaigned on a promise to reduce the national debt.” But then something entirely unforeseeable happened—real events conspired to make that promise difficult to deliver. Huh?! What!? There’s a baseball bat on the wall and an alien holding my baby! Swing away Merrill! Swing away! (Sorry. Sometimes when the world gets too topsy turvy I retreat to the safety of an M. Night Shyamalan movie. #signsreference!)

In any case, now Republicans “are being asked to turn around a half a year later and vote to raise the national debt.” Hold on. Republicans are being “asked” to do something for the good of the country even though it might hurt their popularity in some circles? Stop. I can’t take it. It’s too painful. [See a collection of political cartoons on the budget and deficit.]

Now “the only way these Republican legislators can vote for a debt-ceiling increase without getting thrown out of office,” says Thiessen, “is to show their constituents that they secured unprecedented cuts in current spending—and ironclad constraints on future spending—in exchange.” Enough said. If there’s anything in the world that might hurt Republican poll numbers, it must be avoided at all costs.

Of course, there’s an alternative way of looking at this, I suppose. If to gain office, Republicans entered into an unsustainable and unrealistic electoral compact and are now confronting the discomfort that actual governing can occasionally impose ... oh well...

And I suppose the fact that Republicans admit that not raising the debt ceiling would mean a global economic catastrophe, but, in full possession of this knowledge, still think refusing to raise it is a responsible negotiating strategy, could be legitimate grounds to question their fitness for office. [See a slide show of 6 consequences if the debt ceiling isn't raised.]

And maybe if their posture had less to do with the naked pursuit of a narrow range of highly partisan goals...

But wait. There I go again. Blaming Republicans.

Don't look at me--I'm hideous.

Tags:
deficit and national debt,
Congress,
politics,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (23)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

GOP,s dominated by red necks has sworn to make Obama one term president and will not stop at any thing that will bring down the economy, and therefore the President.This is bad for the nation.That is why they have resisted every investment (on infrastractures) that will bring a trust to the economy. They are focussed on agenda that will continually lead to job cutting.The danger they do not realize is that the presidence they want to set on debt ceiling will leave after them.IMF has pointed out that America nedd to cut down on expences and genearate more revenue by removing tax rebates from those the GOP wants to shield for ever. It is a shame for aparty to go under oat regarding tax no matter the condition.

ken of IL 12:18PM July 27, 2011

Bill Hedges,

You are, again, half right, but NOT totally right. See below:

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/jul/07/barack-obama/obama-claims-job-rate-soared-after-clinton-raised-/

Look, Bill! This is a Primary Document!:

http://web.archive.org/web/20070927022455/http://www.clintonfoundation.org/legacy/080393-presidential-press-conference-in-nevada.htm

ann keenan of MI 11:55PM July 10, 2011

Bill Hedges of MO:

I am sending a primary document from "Meet the Press." You will note that this is a direct transcript from a June 1, 2008 broadcast on MSNBC. You can decide, for yourself, the truthfulness of the situation described by those who spoke on this program, but I wanted you to see an actual PRIMARY DOCUMENT--the original text of a "Meet the Press" discussion. It is not material "picked up from a blog;" it is not a Heritage Foundation--clearly a Republican "think tank" site; this discussion, on MSNBC, contains the exact words that were spoken on this program on this, particular day. Thhis makes this a primary document.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24916139/ns/meet_the_press/t/meet-press-transcript-june/

You are supposed to form your political opinions based on primary documents. You do not do this. Why not?

By the way, speaking of "we have the chutzpah to substitute our judgment for 600,000 voters." Are you at all concerned about the American Legislative Exchange Council that was formed by "a bi-partisan group" of 90% Republicans and 10% Democrats and hundreds of corporations and corporate lobbyists who form "model" legislation at the state level (in EVERY state in the U.S.), but DO NOT include you, or me, or any ordinary HUMAN citizen of the U.S.? Results of the formation of legislation will be expected to pass, whether you like it or not. ALEC has the chutzpah to substitute THEIR judgment for millions and million of human voters.

You are devoted to the Republican Party, and may say that you are perfectly content to have this organization vote FOR you on these state policies and regulations. What happens, however, when ALEC members pass a Bill that you do NOT like? This organization is NOT working within the House and Senate; they quietly and privately work together with corporations to create "model" Bills, and hope

you do not "catch on" when the Bill passes through the State Senate.

ALEC operates for the benefit of the corporations. This sounds positive since corporations provide jobs for us, but what we lose may not be worth the cost of giving up our right to vote. When corporations do the thinking for us, our voice is no longer heard, and we will have slipped into a form of fascism.

ann keenan of MI 2:19AM July 09, 2011

Anson Kaye

Anson Kaye

Anson Kaye, a former congressional chief of staff, is a Democratic strategist and senior vice president at the Washington, D.C., advertising firm GMMB. Follow him on twitter at @aewk.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement