• Comment (10)

Richard Lugar's Loss Is Bad for the U.S.--And for the GOP

May 10, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Nearly 25 years ago, when I was in my early days as a political consultant, I did a TV spot featuring Democratic Sen. Claiborne Pell of Rhode Island. We were about to shoot in his hideaway in the Capitol, and he and I were chatting as the crew was setting up and lighting.

Senator Pell had just taken over as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee from Republican Sen. Richard Lugar. Democrats had regained control of the Senate in 1986 and we were approaching the 1988 elections.

Senator Pell was known for his candor, humility, and self-effacing manner, but even I was surprised when he said to me that he thought Senator Lugar had been a great chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee. 

[Read Peter Roff: What Richard Mourdock's Indiana Win Means for Dick Lugar, GOP]

After all, I was a Democratic consultant, making commercials to make sure Democrats were in power!

"I rather wish he was still the chairman, not me," Senator Pell told me in a whisper.

Of course, Senator Pell was a former foreign service officer, fluent in three European languages, and a well-liked and respected senator. But he was respectful and he admired members of the opposite party, especially Dick Lugar.  After all, they worked together, even when they disagreed with one another. They were also friends.

Lugar's defeat on Tuesday dealt another blow to strong, pragmatic voices in the Congress and a further erosion of a government that can work.  And, sadly, we are seeing the gridlock, the divisiveness, the anger, the hard-right ideology trickling down to all levels of government. 

[See a collection of political cartoons on the Tea Party.]

Senator Lugar was instrumental in so many areas around the world: bringing democracy to the Philippines after the dictator Ferdinand Marcos, passing the Anti-Apartheid Act that opened up South Africa, enacting the Global AIDS Program, and becoming a leader in nuclear nonproliferation.

If you are a Republican and work with Democrats to actually pass something you are suspect.  If you are seen as just a mainstream conservative, never mind a moderate, to the Tea Party, you are toast at their garden party.

This is not healthy for the system and it is not healthy for the Republican Party in the long run. They may even lose this race in Indiana to a moderate Democrat, a solid legislator, someone I also worked for, Rep. Joe Donnelly.

[Read Robert Schlesinger: The Republican Definition of 'Compromise'

This new crop of "young guns" are not voices of reason or logic—they are a marked change from what many of us experienced in the Congress. They want to destroy government, not save it; they want to fan the flames of anger and discord so they can win elections. It is not what the American people want nor what the country needs.

When Richard Mourdock campaigned against Lugar he said, "I think there needs to be more partisanship" in Washington. Sad.

But maybe Senator Lugar said it best Tuesday night when he compared his philosophy of good government with Mourdock’s beliefs:

He and I share many positions, but his embrace of an unrelenting partisan mindset is irreconcilable with my philosophy of governance and my experience of what brings results for Hoosiers in the Senate. In effect, what he has promised in this campaign is reflexive votes for a rejectionist orthodoxy and rigid opposition to the actions and proposals of the other party. His answer to the inevitable roadblocks he will encounter in Congress is merely to campaign for more Republicans who embrace the same partisan outlook. He has pledged his support to groups whose prime mission is to cleanse the Republican party of those who stray from orthodoxy as they see it.

There is no doubt in my mind that the late-Sen. Claiborne Pell would be truly sorry about the fate of his friend and colleague, but he would also weep for what is happening to his beloved Senate.

 

Tags:
Richard Lugar,
Tea Party,
politics,
Senate,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Vous aurez à considérer les aspects intérieur d'un défi important pour l'un de tous les sites de blogs les plus bénéfiques pour l'ensemble du filet. En fait, je peux suggérer www.usnews.com!

escorts France of NE 5:06PM February 07, 2013

The "Middle" is who got us where we are now. Yes it is time for a revolution.

Scrapper of CA 12:53AM May 12, 2012

Friend Hedges, (I'll still use the term friend if you don't mind), you keep missing my point. You're minority opinion is not going to prevail. So, you have two choices, have nothing get done or compromise. You think Reagan and Tip O'Neil (back when politicians actually could fight all day and be friends at night) didn't compromise? You think Newt balanced the budget all by himself without Clinton's signature? You think the founding fathers got all that they wanted? No, the constitution itself is a compromise document. You can scream all the way to heck about being right, but it's not going to change the political reality. You cannot tell me raising taxes, even just a little, will be so debilitating to our economy that the Pubs cannot give in a little on it. Liberals haven't compromised? Uh...Obamacare was a compromise, amongst Dems. The libs didn't get a public option, the blue dog Dems did the job of the Pubs and refused to sign on to that. Not all Dems are true libs, got quite a few moderates and blue dog Dems still in our party. We haven't purged them out like the Pubs are doing. So, plenty of Dems on the other side of the aisle you could do business with if you wanted. The House and Obama had the makings of a "Grand Plan" and it fell through. The Pub candidates said they wouldn't even support a 10-1 ratio of spending cuts to tax increases. Seriously? McConnell said early on he would do nothing to help this Prez at all. His objective was not to govern, but to defeat Obama no matter what. I know there are some lib Dems you cannot do business with. O.k. with me if Pelosi gets voted out, but to say nothing can be done with Dems is a really lame excuse not to govern.

How come you never talk about the Pubs not wanting to cut any of their sacred spending cows? I bet you friend Hedges you and I could sit down and work on both judicial and military reform that could save billions every year, but instead the Pubs want to cut something as meager as Planned Parenthoood? (Heaven forbid if we were to cut abstinence programs!!) I mean come on. O.k., don't compromise on taxes, but can't you at least compromise on spending cuts? Do you support agriculture and oil and gas subsidies?

Instead of talking about Pub and Dems perhaps we should be talking about why it is no longer viable for a simple majority of the Senate to pass a bill. We can agree on that yes?

Lastly, the Pub party (and Dems to some extent) are a shrinking party. Neither the Dem nor the Pub party represents a majority, but both feel the tail should wag the dog. It's a shame to see the Pub party trying it's darndest to become an even smaller minority party. I believe in the two-party system. To me they are a check and balance to each other. We need each to make to make the system work.

I like you friend Hedges, sorry the feeling isn't mutual.

Bruce B, like you too!

bing of AL 8:33PM May 11, 2012

Peter Fenn

Peter Fenn

Peter Fenn is a Democratic political strategist and head of Fenn Communications, one of the nation's leading political and public affairs media firms. Fenn Communications has worked in over 300 campaigns, from presidential to mayoral, and has represented a number of Fortune 500 companies. Fenn is also an adjunct professor at George Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management. Follow him on Twitter @peterhfenn.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement