• Comment (3)

What the South's Scary Republican Electorate Says About the GOP

March 14, 2012 RSS Feed Print

There has been a lot written about the make-up of the Republican primary electorate in 2012. By now, it has become clear how very conservative they are, how many of them are evangelicals, how social issues motivate many of them, and how truly angry they are at President Obama.

As I have written before, this is not your mother's Republican Party.

But the latest polls by the reputable and respected Public Policy Polling group in Tuesday's primary states of Alabama and Mississippi tell a pretty disturbing story. They surveyed 656 likely Republican voters in Mississippi and 600 in Alabama this past week.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the Republican party.]

In Alabama, 45 percent described themselves as "very conservative" and 36 percent as "somewhat conservative"; in Mississippi, those numbers were 44 percent and 34 percent respectively. Not a huge shock there.

In Alabama, 68 percent describe themselves as "Evangelical Christian." In Mississippi, that percentage was 70 percent. Again, not that surprising in the deep South.

But here comes the more disturbing news: In Alabama, 60 percent do not believe in evolution. In Mississippi, the figure is 66 percent. 

When it comes to interracial marriage, 29 percent of Republican primary voters in Mississippi believe it should be illegal. In Alabama, 21 percent think it should be illegal.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Is Mitt Romney Vulnerable in the South?]

Now, both of those last two answers would really mean turning back the clock!

And on Barack Obama's religion, in response to the straightforward question, "Do you think Barack Obama is a Christian or a Muslim or are you not sure?"  the answers are scary. In Alabama, 14 percent say Christian, 45 percent say Muslim, 41 percent are not sure. In Mississippi, 12 percent say Christian, 52 percent say Muslim, and 36 percent are not sure.

Several years ago we saw disturbing numbers on the Muslim question, but there has been enough publicity, enough coverage, enough debunking of the false accusations, that one would think that people would have moved on. Not so.

Why do the most engaged voters in Republican primaries seem to hold views that are outright false? Is the hatred of Obama so visceral that they will believe anything that comes across the Internet? Are their views reinforced by friends and neighbors? Do they simply not believe any facts when they are presented?

[Check out our editorial cartoons on President Obama.]

The truly scary thing is that though these numbers are from two states, this is looking less like an aberration. The Republican primary voters over the last few decades have become increasing more radically conservative, the delegates to the conventions more far right, the Republican Party more rigid. It was impossible for Sen. John McCain to nominate a Tom Ridge or a Joe Lieberman as vice president—too pro-choice. The platform at each convention has become more conservative, especially on social issues. The no-tax pledge has become a needless straight-jacket, yet signed by virtually all Republicans in Congress.

But, these two polls show a remarkable closed-mindedness when it comes to issues of race and religion that many thought were settled with open-mindedness. Apparently not.

Tags:
Mississippi,
Alabama,
religion,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Im glad Progressives are scared! They should be

Della Creighton of TX 12:15PM November 29, 2012

Libs use euphemisms like "social conservative" for Catholics and Evangelicals to avoid conflict with the diversity agenda. An unintended consequence for libs of this mealymouthed PC language is legitimization of combining church and state. If abortion, contraception, homosexuality, etc., are merely conservative issues and not dogma from Rome, then these issues are legitimate political ones rather than religious ones that should be excluded by the First Amendment from government control.

Luther of LA 4:00PM March 15, 2012

THE DEMOCRATS ARE STUNNED BEYOND BELIEF THAT OBAMA COULD BE SO FAR DOWN THE SHORT END OF THE MONEY-HUSTLING STICK...

It's so bad for them that they have no choice but to IMMEDIATELY pound whatever theme a big-money democrat super PAC donor selects for them, in the hope of squeezing out more money from that big-money donor.

Here, PFenn picks up where Bill Maher's million-dollar super PAC donation left off - in terms of PFenn continuing Maher's 'Toothless Tuesday' characterization of people in Mississippi and Alabama.

So ball is in your court now Maher. Either ante up at least another $500 grand in the next thirty or bundle some comedian buddies to do so.

What Maher could find out soon enough is how vicious the Plouffe-led Obama shills like PFenn can be. If Maher doesn't follow through with more $$$, PFenn and the rest will likely turn on Maher to where Maher goes from super PAC saint to traitor.

Money-Grub 101: A common hustler/strategist like PFenn knows that if someone like Maher will donate a million to the Obama super PAC cause, he can easily be squeezed for double that amount -- or else.

Maher for his part thought he could buy a million-dollars worth of publicity for himself but is now in the process of finding out how the only thing he really bought for himself is another million-dollar Obama super PAC donation within 90 days.

Moral of da story: Lay down with Obama, get up with Plouffes and PFenns.

dom youngross of OH 5:01AM March 15, 2012

Peter Fenn

Peter Fenn

Peter Fenn is a Democratic political strategist and head of Fenn Communications, one of the nation's leading political and public affairs media firms. Fenn Communications has worked in over 300 campaigns, from presidential to mayoral, and has represented a number of Fortune 500 companies. Fenn is also an adjunct professor at George Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management. Follow him on Twitter @peterhfenn.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement