• Comment (15)

The 2012 Republican Debates Did the GOP More Harm Than Good

February 23, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Last night may be the last primary debate for quite a while. The Democrats are weeping. The Republican insiders are breathing a huge sigh of relief.

If pundits had predicted last year that a 20-plus debate season stretching over 10 months would have resulted in Republicans becoming weaker, not stronger, they would have been greeted with serious quizzical skepticism, if not outright ridicule.

All this exposure, all this opportunity to attack President Obama—and unanswered to boot—was hard to resist. And what a chance they had to advance a program of ideas, a new vision for America. Not only that, but the strong would rise to the top and the weak would fall by the wayside.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the 2012 GOP hopefuls.]

What an opportunity for a candidate to put his or her weaknesses behind, to stress their positives, and move into a general election mode.

The example many cited was the Obama-Clinton period in 2007-2008 when the field started large and winnowed down quickly. Certainly, this was a tremendous benefit to the Obama campaign as it unfolded, and he and Sen. Hillary Clinton went through that grueling winter and spring. He emerged stronger and a Pew poll showed that 80 percent of Democrats felt very positively about their final two candidates.

But history did not come close to repeating itself in 2011-2012. The Republican debates have not been kind to the candidates, to the party, or to their supporters. The candidates have done their very best to out-right-wing each other. Whether it was on the issues of immigration, contraceptives, tax breaks for the wealthy, or abolishing the EPA, the Department of Education and, ah, what was that third one, again? The candidates worked overtime on stage to appeal to the narrowest of Tea Party supporters.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the Tea Party.]

Though it was hard to exceed the extremism of the candidates, the audiences at the debates were way over the top. Booing a gay soldier when he came on to ask a question, booing Brian Williams when he had the nerve to ask about the death penalty, calling out Gov. Rick Perry when he had the audacity to support education for Hispanic students. The applause lines with these 99 percent white audiences of Tea Party supporters drove the TV audiences to form distinctly negative images.

The same Pew poll that measured the Republicans' positive feelings about their candidates was about half what the Democrats found four years ago, in the 40 percent range. And independents, who have been pretty tough on President Obama, did not like what they saw over the last year with these debates.

That is why many Republicans are so distraught with the current field that they are willing to put out the casting call for another candidate. The hand wringing among Republican operatives has grown with each passing month. If this campaign season goes on much longer, the outcry will only grow stronger.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the Republican party.]

Former Gov. Mitt Romney has the chance to put this away by close of business on Super Tuesday, thanks to his huge money advantage and organizational strength. If he manages to win Arizona and Michigan, and sweeps most states on March 6, there will be resignation in Republican-land.

But if former Sen. Rick Santorum does well and muddies the waters in the coming two weeks, watch out. Anything can happen and probably will. Heaven forbid, more debates!

Tags:
Rick Santorum,
politics,
2012 presidential election,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (15)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

And here is something that hasn't even been looked at closely yet. Pakistan [which is the only nuclear armed Islamic country] was a partner and friend of America.. albeit with normal policy disagreements .. until recently.

The Obama administration, due to the diplomatic Way they handled the fallout of the mission to get Osama Bin Laden, has made us mortal enemies with Pakistan almost over night. It's arguably the most serious foreign policy blunder in years by an American administration.

Unfortunately the 3 saber rattling Republican candidates [the tyranny boys, Santorum and Gingrich and Romney] competing for the job of "warlord in chief" would take us from the frying pan into the fire. How long before we have WW3 between Islam and the west? Go around the world and talk to Muslim People, they're good people... as are most People from most cultures. And the people everywhere do best when they check the excesses and the abuses of government "rule".

Ron Paul in 2012, especially for the sake of our kids and our grandkids.

John of NY 9:05AM February 26, 2012

A FEW OF OBAMA'S FAVORITE MORE HARM THAN GOOD THINGS...

Sky-high federal debt and deficits,

Out-of-work people no longer even counted as unemployed,

Rising gas prices,

About half of all people not even paying income taxes,

More people on food stamps,

Chomping at the bit to get involved in Syria and Iran, which would yet further enhance China's national economic competitiveness over us, and

Dragging feet to get the hell out of now-rioting Afghanistan (remember that fantasy July 2011 drawdown date?).

Yep, all those things are raindrops on roses and whiskers on kittens for Obama's reelection. Because none of those things are related to Obama of course. And now algae replaced windmills as his warm woolen mittens.

PFenn is whistlin' through the graveyard. For both his USN&WR opining gig and Obama's reelection.

You can tell when someone has hit bottom and tanked out when like PFenn they too finally get around to playing the race card (99% white audience...).

Democrats and lefty shills like PFenn right now are suffering major free-floating anxiety over which republican will take out Obama. They'll collectively breath a short-lived sigh of relief when the republican candidate is picked. Then promptly lapse even further into a depressive funk. Maybe even suffer a stroke and roll over on their backs.

Here's the essential Obama that PFenn can't spin:

http://www.creators.com/editorial_cartoons/2/19315_image.gif

Rep. Ron Paul, 2012. Stacking the convention delegate deck as we speak. And good for it.

-----

PS: When it comes to Paul, the intentionally-clueless and consequently-befuddled tip their cluelessness and befuddlement when they yarn on about an independent run. Ron Paul in 2012 -- as a republican -- or we pick up with his son Rand Paul in '16 -- as a republican. It's all happening from the precinct level up.

dom youngross of OH 12:52PM February 24, 2012

Clinton and Obama never competed over who was the more "liberal" candidate. They where both moderates who played up their debates to the American people. Dennis Kucinich was the only one who was proud to be liberal and didn't hide his liberalism from the American people.

The Republicans are doing the exact opposite and this is why they are so weak. They are trying to out "conservative" each other. None of them are coming across as moderates. Moderate is even used as an insult by Gingrich to describe Romney.

The economy is getting better and instead of talking jobs the Republicans are talking birth control. And the birth control thing is backfiring. They may have Catholics on their side but they are losing women. And losing women big.

The only silver lining that the Republicans have is gas prices, which they are now blaming on Obama. But anyone who is voting age will remember when gas prices rose under Bush and the same Republicans now wanting to blame Obama for the high gas pries where the same who where saying that Bush had no power to control gas prices and shouldn't be blamed.

The Republicans have snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. The GOP is fractured cannot survive in it's current form. I predict Ron Paul will run as an independent (or risk pissing off his large following) and that the mainstream Republican party will split between whatever moderates are left, and the religious/tea party extreme which seems to dominate the party now. I don't see how the GOP is going to survive in the long term.

Voter demographics are changing, they need the latino vote, they need the female vote. They can try to play games with voter registration to try and limit the number of likely Democrats voting but that is not a good long term strategy. They GOP needs to modernize. But unfortunately modernized and conservative don't exactly go together.

Kim Rathkamp of GA 1:57AM February 24, 2012

Peter Fenn

Peter Fenn

Peter Fenn is a Democratic political strategist and head of Fenn Communications, one of the nation's leading political and public affairs media firms. Fenn Communications has worked in over 300 campaigns, from presidential to mayoral, and has represented a number of Fortune 500 companies. Fenn is also an adjunct professor at George Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management. Follow him on Twitter @peterhfenn.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement