• Comment (7)

'Super Committee' Failure: Super Gridlock in the Muppet Congress

November 21, 2011 RSS Feed Print

In an age of super heroes and blockbuster movies glorifying those with extraordinary powers, we are left with the Muppets. And that may be doing a disservice to the Muppets.

Only 9 percent of the American people have a positive image of Congress—slightly higher than the percentage that view Fidel Castro favorably. Now that is scary.

Are these bad people? No. Do they not have the best interests of the American people at heart? I believe most do.

[Vote: Who is to Blame for the Failure of the Super Committee?]

Is this all about two different philosophies of government? Certainly, that is a big part of the stalemate.

Unfortunately, most Americans now believe that there is more consensus, more cooperation, and more compromise—and maybe more maturity—on a nursery school play yard than in the U.S. Congress.

We can point to growing polarization, a lack of civility, people coming to Congress in ideological straight jackets, signing ridiculous pledges, being beholden to the more extreme elements of their political party.

But I would argue that American Democracy, at least for the moment, has transitioned into a parliamentary system, without the accountability. It is nearly impossible for Members of Congress to routinely cross party lines, at least on the most important votes. The pressure is great, the ideology has become increasingly rigid, and the politics of bucking your leadership is seriously problematic.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the deficit super committee.]

The current gridlock on our most difficult problems can't be resolved by dissolving the government and holding new elections. It probably won't be resolved next November. We will be faced, no matter who wins, with equal or greater intransigence from the opposition party.

And our voters will not have a chance to vote, as in a parliamentary system, for or against the party in power or the back benchers. Because our system now allows a minority to stifle the majority so easily in the Senate, through filibusters and holds, but allows the majority to dictate what is brought to the floor and voted on in the House, we are faced with paralysis.

Never before have I seen such a strong sense of a party-lock in Congress. Our recent history is one of moderates in the two parties holding swing votes, people crossing party lines on issues, and the ability to reach compromise when the country demands it.

[Laura Chapin: What the Kardashians and the Super Committee Have in Common]

Now, we exhibit all the markings of a parliamentary system but cannot extricate ourselves from the tendency toward permanent gridlock. Campaigns never end and self-preservation determines many members' votes. The old approach of "working it out" is gone, at least temporarily, and there is no mechanism, even with the so-called super committee, to bust out of the hold that the system has on Congress.

The American people, after this latest breakdown, are watching as their savings and 401k's are tanking. They are watching the blame game. They are watching Congress do very little to create jobs and improve their economic plight. For the moment, all they can do is throw up their hands. And the anger builds.

Tags:
debt,
Congress,
deficit and national debt,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"...and the anger builds." You're damned right it does.

Tom of SC 1:10PM November 23, 2011

If this were a Republican Administration, you'd be railing against the lack of leadership. Even in a nursery school yard there is some sort of leadership, which 'makes' the kids compromise, and get 'things' done. With the vacuum of leadership we have now, nothing will get done. I also agree on the previous posts..

Bruce of CA 11:06AM November 22, 2011

Susan White of SC

Add to Hunter's comment Democrats wanted to pass raise in debt ceiling but Reid said NO. Reid wanted to wait until Republicans took control of House in January of 2011. Let the Republicans take some of the blame. That Reid. What a guy. Of course blame Republicans.

You're listening to the words of berry instead of looking at what he does. Even Pelosi voted against raising debt ceiling. Even Reed voted against Barry's job bill. Of course blame Republicans...

Bill Hedges of MO 12:53AM November 22, 2011

Peter Fenn

Peter Fenn

Peter Fenn is a Democratic political strategist and head of Fenn Communications, one of the nation's leading political and public affairs media firms. Fenn Communications has worked in over 300 campaigns, from presidential to mayoral, and has represented a number of Fortune 500 companies. Fenn is also an adjunct professor at George Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management. Follow him on Twitter @peterhfenn.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement