Democrats Must Be Adults as GOP Redefines 'Tax Increase'

June 27, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

OK, this isn’t exactly asking what the meaning of “is,” “is,” but it is close.

What is a tax increase? Is it letting a previous, temporary tax cut expire and go back to the earlier tax? Is it the “closing of a loophole” to remove a favorable tax break put in place for a specific industry? Is it the imposition of a fee or the increase in a fee? Is it really anything that results in an increase in revenue?

[See editorial cartoons on the national budget and deficit.]

We can go on and on here, but what we are really talking about is not an esoteric debate. If you listen to Republicans right now, particularly Rep. Eric Cantor, who picked up his marbles and went home from White House negotiations, you would think that everything is a “tax increase.”

The sad aspect of the current debate is that what many Republicans are espousing is that added revenue should be “off the table.” This is clearly a nonstarter for truly solving our problems. [Check out a roundup of GOP political cartoons.]

It also is inflexible and holds to the absurd notion that taxes can never go up; they can only go down. That sort of reminds me of: Housing prices can only go up; they don’t go down! Hmmm…

Democrats, to be honest, have to be the responsible party when it comes to providing balance to the cuts/revenue equation. They need not fear the boogeyman crying “tax raiser!”

Americans, by large majorities, understand that the richest 2 percent of their fellow citizens have seen rapid and large increases in their wealth of late, and asking them to pay their fair share is a no brainer. Americans understand that providing huge tax breaks to oil companies already making huge profits makes no sense. Americans understand that rewarding companies for parking their profits overseas or exporting jobs is untenable, and such behavior should not entitle them to special tax “incentives.” [Vote now: Will there be a debt ceiling deal?]

In short, most Americans know that adequate revenue is part of the critical balance that will create and keep jobs as well as attack our debt problem. It is not about eviscerating government and tearing apart our social fabric. Republicans as conservative as Ronald Reagan have known the meaning of a tax increase and have not hesitated to use it.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Eric Cantor,
income tax,
Republican Party,
deficit and national debt,
unemployment,
White House

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The Congress has not passed a budget for the Federal Government for nearly three years. The present method of financial management comes down to this:

-Spend all you care to now with no regard for where the money will come from or whether there is enough to cover the expenditures.

-When the Treasury runs short, increase the debt limit and borrow some more.

-Repeat.

Federal spending has gone up dramatically in the last few years. In 2007, the total US debt from the first 218 years of operation was around $5 trillion. In the last four years it has grown to over $14 trillion and counting.

THIS is madness. The people who demand it stop are the sane adults.

Phil of VA 2:02PM August 04, 2011

1. “if the rich were taxed at a higher rate( like during the clinton years ) it would mean the food bank ,salvation army and driving their beamer a year longer. ” Wrong.

“The Reagan Tax Cuts: Lessons for Tax Reform”

“The 1993 Clinton tax increase appears to having the opposite effect on the willingness of wealthy taxpayers to expose income to taxation. According to IRS data, the income generated by the top one percent of income earners actually declined in 1993. This decline is especially significant since the retroactivity of the Clinton tax increase in that year limited the ability of taxpayers to deploy tax avoidance strategies, temporarily resulting in an increase in their tax burden. Moreover, according to the FY 1997 Clinton budget submission, individual income tax revenues as a share of GDP will be lower during the first four years of the Clinton tax increase, which include the effects of the 1990 tax increase, than under the last four years of the Reagan tax changes (FY 1986-89). Furthermore, according to a study published by the National Bureau for Economic Research,[] the Clinton tax hike is failing to collect over 40 percent of the projected revenue increases. ”

http://www.house.gov/jec/fiscal/tx-grwth/reagtxct/reagtxct.htm

“According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Bush tax cuts actually shifted the total tax burden farther toward the rich so that in 2000-2004, total income tax paid by the top 40% of income-earners grew by 4.6% to 99.1% of the total.”

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/03/lying_about_bushs_tax_cuts.html

2. “for the eight years under that financial guru george bush, the lncome's of the middle and lower class stayed flat,or decreased.”

Ah brucetee, we had the “great Bill Clinton housing recession”. Was not just the “ lncome's of the middle and lower class” that suffered.

Democrats ignored guru George Bush WARNINGS and we got recession:

“Nancy Pelosi (D) Caught Lying: Says Bush Didn’t Warn Congress About Financial Crisis”

http://friskaliberal.wordpress.com/2010/05/04/nancy-pelosi-d-caught-lying-says-bush-didn%E2%80%99t-warn-congress-about-financial-crisis/

Bill Hedges of MO 8:12PM June 28, 2011

tax cuts for the rich,why to hear the way that that people like cantor and that cracker Mc connell tell it,if the rich were taxed at a higher rate( like during the clinton years ) it would mean the food bank ,salvation army and driving their beamer a year longer.

as to justin of tx commemt "screwing the rich"he seems to have things backwards.for the eight years under that financial guru george bush, the lncome's of the middle and lower class stayed flat,or decreased.

bruce b of NV 1:23PM June 28, 2011

Peter Fenn

Peter Fenn

Peter Fenn is a Democratic political strategist and head of Fenn Communications, one of the nation's leading political and public affairs media firms. Fenn Communications has worked in over 300 campaigns, from presidential to mayoral, and has represented a number of Fortune 500 companies. Fenn is also an adjunct professor at George Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management. Follow him on Twitter @peterhfenn.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement