Lucy, Charlie Brown, and the Government Shutdown Football

April 6, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

Remember that wonderful cartoon every year with Charlie Brown, Lucy, and the football? She would place it down so nicely, Charlie Brown would run up to kick it and BAM! poor Charlie Brown would land on his backside, Lucy having pulled the football away.

Poor Speaker Boehner--I am not sure if he is Lucy or Charlie Brown. Of course, it was Boehner and the House Republican leaders who first put out the $30 billion in cuts on the table. Now it appears they won’t accept the very numbers they laid out. So, is the speaker pulling the football away? Is he Lucy?

Or, as some would maintain, the Tea Party House members played the roll of Lucy here by putting the speaker in the position of running up to the ball, ready to strike a deal to avoid a government shutdown, and pulling the ball out from underneath him? [See 10 effects of a government shutdown.]

Either way, the speaker understands he and the Republicans are in serious danger if the government shuts down. And it certainly did not help when the prospect of a government shutdown got a standing ovation from the Republican caucus! Having Republican members applaud the notion of denying pay checks to the military, putting workers out the door without pay, halting the economic recovery in its tracks, is not sensible.

A $61 billion cut, as the Tea Party wants, would cost 700,000 to 800,000 jobs. It would slash funding for Head Start, Pell grants for college students, EPA enforcement, clearly way beyond what the public would accept. 

The image of the chaos a government shutdown would create on the evening news, night after night, is not something that Americans want to see. 

The Washington Post poll yesterday shows that although the American people believe that both Democrats and Republicans would share the blame for a shutdown, a large majority believe Republicans are playing politics with the issue.  By 62 to 31 percent they believe Republicans are playing politics rather than honestly trying to solve the budget impasse. Even 40 percent of GOP respondents believe the Republicans are playing politics!

Maybe that is why the speaker believes this would hurt his party. It is time for him to stand up to the Tea Party members and get the job done. Who is running the show up there, anyway? Time is running out.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
national security terrorism and the military,
Tea Party,
Congress,
Republican Party,
John Boehner,
deficit and national debt,
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

You ask: "how many of those jobs would shift over to the private sector, or are jobs that serve no real function?"

The article uses Headstart programs as an example of what the right wants to cut funding for. Headstart programs are essentially pre-school. Children that participate in these programs would likely be sitting in a relative's house watching television all day, if not for those programs. Preparing children for elementary school, rather than sitting them in front of the tube, makes them more likely to succeed throughout their education and more likely to go on to college. College-educated people are less likely to rely on government assistance throughout their lives, including section 8, medicaid, WIC, and various other programs. They are more likely to wait to have children until they can afford to do so without assistance. They are more likely to have children that themselves go on to college, repeating the cycle of upward mobility.

If those Headstart jobs are eliminated, those employees will not likely shift to the private sector because those individuals that utilize Headstart programs aren't sitting on a mountain of cash that they simply don't feel like spending on private preschools. Eliminating government programs of these types does not create demand in the private sector. If you can't afford a service, you can't afford a service. It just perpetuates the cycle of poverty, which is more expensive in the long run. An educated nation is a prosperous nation.

There are two ways to reduce the number of people on public assistance and the amount of money spent on those programs: 1) help people so that they don't NEED public assistance, or 2) just make it harder to get public assistance. One of those options actually helps people. The other one just pretends the problem doesn't exist.

Mer of CA 10:47AM April 07, 2011

Reed says cowboy poet society funding in his home State can not be cut. He rather poor child with cancer forget treatment and die.

Democrats had all the chances in the world to pass a budget. They know the polls and saw Nov. 2, 2010 results. Was not to be for them to step up to the plate and perform at their pay grade.

_____

“Recovery From Tax Cuts, Not Govt Spending”

“Where is the historical evidence to show that big increases in government spending as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) lead to faster economic growth and more job creation?”

“Answer: There isn't any.”

http://www.newsmax.com/Rahn/taxes--bill--clinton--george--bush--economic-crisis/2010/08/10/id/367105

Bill Hedges of MO 5:40AM April 07, 2011

I think it will be something like the Illegal aliens strike, or the last NFL strike--few will notice any big difference. CBS news was pointing out the "horrors," national parks not opening, slow processing of paper income tax forms, Border Patrol not working (like we could squeeze any more illegal aliens in the country with a working Border patrol given the obstructive nature of the very corrupt Barack Obama), overpaid government workers laid off (I was surprised to learn that workers got back pay for last government shutdown--showing that "collective bargaining" between public service unions and government is simply cronies rewarding each other).

Luther of LA 7:48PM April 06, 2011

Peter Fenn

Peter Fenn

Peter Fenn is a Democratic political strategist and head of Fenn Communications, one of the nation's leading political and public affairs media firms. Fenn Communications has worked in over 300 campaigns, from presidential to mayoral, and has represented a number of Fortune 500 companies. Fenn is also an adjunct professor at George Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management. Follow him on Twitter @peterhfenn.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement