Michele Bachmann Is a Real Face of the GOP and Tea Party

January 28, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (28)

Rep. Michele Bachmann clearly has become a real face of the Republican Party as well as the Tea Party, and that is a big problem for House Speaker John Boehner and mainstream Republicans. Thanks to 24/7 cable and the fact that her outrageous statements make good copy, Bachmann can now get on television nearly any time she desires.

The very notion that she was able to secure national television time for her so-called “response” to President Obama’s State of the Union address is laughable. But because of the prominence of the Tea Party and Bachmann’s over-the-top rhetoric, she was out there embarrassing the speaker and most Republicans. [Check out a roundup of political cartoons on the Tea Party.]

She is embarrassing because of her extreme views, her lack of knowledge of history, and her constant and never-ending desire for publicity. But why does she do it? 

Let’s look at a little history here. Watch the tape from 2006 at the Living Word Christian Church in Minnesota, where she says that “God called me to run for the U.S. Congress.” Bachmann maintains that she and her husband fasted and prayed for three days, and at the end of day two, the Lord called her to run. Not only that, but God told her to go to law school, the Lord told her to study tax law at the suggestion, too, of her husband. And, of course, as she maintained on that tape, God says “we should be submissive to our husbands.” This was not a joke. It is one thing to have a strong religious faith, to believe in God, and to live by the values of the Bible, but it is quite another to testify that God is your personal life planner. [See who donates the most money to Bachmann.]

I am afraid she may believe that this may excuse her from making ridiculous statements such as why she wanted members of Congress investigated: “Are they pro-American or anti-American?” Or, “I want people in Minnesota armed and dangerous;” or, “Global warming is a hoax, hokum;” or, “There isn’t even one study that can be produced that shows carbon dioxide is a harmful gas;” or our Founding Fathers “worked tirelessly until slavery was no more in the U.S.” Michelle Bachmann’s quotes, factual errors, and outrageous statements could fill volumes.

Fortunately most people who are responsible for creating public policy in America do not take her seriously, do not respect her approach to solving the real problems we face, and do not appreciate her constant drive for the limelight.

My guess is that she is driven more by ego and a desire for TV time than anything else, but as long as she is the “face” of Republicans and the Tea Party, the more dangerous she is to their goals and aspirations. To put it simply, she is not credible as a serious spokesperson, she does more harm than good to true conservatives, and she will be a thorn in the Republicans’ side (let alone the country’s).

Of course, as I write this, Nevada’s crash and burn former Senate candidate, Sharron Angle, is traveling to Iowa and has discussed a presidential run. So, wouldn’t this be rich:  Bachmann and Angle both running for President?!

Tags:
State of the Union,
Tea Party,
Republican Party,
energy policy and climate change,
Congress,
Michele Bachmann,
Sarah Palin

Reader Comments Read all comments (28)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Please put her comments into full context and don't cherry pick.

Bias much?

Kevin of IL 4:38AM March 30, 2011

Woody Alford of WA:

You state that you are a "retired engineer." What kind of engineer were you? My Uncle is a civil engineer, and he always, carefully researched the entire background and requirements of an assignment. He carefully researched political news, also, because he knew that newscasters and pundits are not required to tell the truth, and most corporations pay big money to have newscasters and pundits tell lies about the politicians, and misrepresent and distort thousands of chronicles of government and politics.

It is odd that my Uncle has come to totally different conclusions than you do about the political landscape we have witnessed in the last several years. The only way to learn the truth is to seek primary documents. Did you, Woody, come to form your opinions based on primary documents? If you read a newspaper, a magazine, a book, watch television and/or a film, listen to the radio and/or listen to a recording about any political topic, how could you say that any of them were primary documents? If not found in a primary document, how do you know truth?

You feel quite free to disparage, but where are your citations? Do not worry, you won't be sued for libel and slander; you do not have to tell the truth on the Internet either. If anyone accused you of lying--no problem--anyone, anytime, anywhere, and in any media forum can lie! We will lose our democracy because of this, however.

How can you make intelligent decisions about a candidate's character, ethics, veracity, and leadership if all of us are free to lie to one another? How do we elect a representative for, we the people, if we do not actually know the truth about this candidate? Your statements (below) fall into the realm of propaganda. That is legal too! When we lose our democracy because we could not determine what was propaganda and what were facts, which candidate is worthy and which candidate is not, I hope you will happily thrive in our corporate oligarchy.

Your right to vote should be based on the truth; if you do not search for the truth, you deserve what you get. The representative for you will be based on which corporation paid the most money to win the election of the candidates of the Corporation's choice. You will probably vote for who the corporation wanted anyway; News Corporation, for instance, DOES have the best propaganda--and you like propaganda, obviously.

Woody's Propaganda Statements:

"dim witted Democrats..."

"scares you poor morons..."

"He is the most laughed at president we have ever had...."

"...he is found out to have been supported by Muslim extremest, and that Socialist bunch out of Chicago.....?

Could you provide citations for the above statements? If not; you are spitting into the wind.

Ann Keenan of MI 11:22PM February 05, 2011

I cring when I watch her.

JWH of PA 7:10PM January 31, 2011

Peter Fenn

Peter Fenn

Peter Fenn is a Democratic political strategist and head of Fenn Communications, one of the nation's leading political and public affairs media firms. Fenn Communications has worked in over 300 campaigns, from presidential to mayoral, and has represented a number of Fortune 500 companies. Fenn is also an adjunct professor at George Washington University's Graduate School of Political Management. Follow him on Twitter @peterhfenn.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement