After the 2010 Elections End, Governing Must Begin

October 29, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (8)

In five days it will all be over. Even if tight races in Alaska, Hawaii, and Nevada make those individual outcomes unknown as the sun rises on November 3, Election 2010 will be in the books.

Most will be grateful that the onslaught of negative ads, which seemed to be on a continuous loop for the last six weeks, will be gone. No more interruptions while watching the Food Network, ESPN, or Modern Family to be told 25 times that Candidate X kills puppies and eats small children.

Personally I nominate Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley for the worst ads. How does he sleep at night with all those lies? My guess is readers all over the country feel the same way about their candidates too.

But once the sun does rise and campaigning is done, it’s time for governing.

[Check out our editorial cartoons on the 2010 campaigns.]

On November 3, there will be 735 days until the next national election. Instead of pontificating on how horrible the likely-GOP controlled House will be, or on how constrained the Republican agenda will be with a Democrat in the White House and a likely-Democrat controlled Senate, work on finding common ground. There are serious problems facing the country and the American public deserves better than they’ve had of late.

Rhode Island Democrat Frank Carpio demonstrated this week exactly what I am talking about. Telling the president of the United States (who happens to be a Democrat no less) that he can “shove it” was a wonderful example of what we all expect from our leaders. Going back to the “how do they sleep at night” question, how does he explain to his children why he acted like a middle-school bully to the leader of the free world?  

There’s lots of work to be done come November 3. For starters, it’s been estimated this election cost more than $4 billion. Congress needs to find ways to make sure that all the business interests who spent money on this election start spending money on hiring workers. Unemployment is still at unacceptable levels.

Second, fix the mortgage mess. I am not sure how, but with news this week that Wells Fargo is joining the ranks of other banks saying their foreclosure procedures were less than forthright, something needs to be done. Yes, people bought homes they could not afford, but what about the people who bought homes they could afford--only be laid off?

And here a few things they shouldn’t do. Republicans in the House should not start questioning the Obama administration in the same vein Democrats did with the Bush administration in 2007. These investigations cost taxpayer money, lots of money, and do nothing to solve the real problems at hand. When there is a $100 billion surplus, the War on Terror has been won, and unemployment is nonexistent, investigate away. Until then, there are bigger fish to fry.

Finally, if Democrats in the House have any sense at all, they will encourage House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to either retire from the House altogether or to step aside from leadership. As long as she is calling the shots, they won’t have a prayer and neither will the American public.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
2010 Congressional elections,
Barack Obama,
George W. Bush,
mortgages,
Congress,
Nancy Pelosi,
national security terrorism and the military,
unemployment,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"It is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now ... Cutting taxes now is not to incur a budget deficit, but to achieve the more prosperous, expanding economy which can bring a budget surplus."

– John F. Kennedy, Nov. 20, 1962, president's news conference

For more John F Kennedy quotes on tax cuts:

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39517

My favorite John F. Kennedy quote is:

"Our true choice is not between tax reduction, on the one hand, and the avoidance of large Federal deficits on the other. It is increasingly clear that no matter what party is in power, so long as our national security needs keep rising, an economy hampered by restrictive tax rates will never produce enough revenues to balance our budget just as it will never produce enough jobs or enough profits… In short, it is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high today and tax revenues are too low and the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now."

For more proof of tax cuts for rich increases their taxes burden go to this source:

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2003/08/the-historical-lessons-of-lower-tax-rates

John F. Kennedy might be a TEA member today.

With recession occurring on Bush watch, left may put the blinders on and blame Bush for the financial bust using tax cuts to rich as cause. But CBO BLOWS that idea out of the water:

“According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Bush tax cuts actually shifted the total tax burden farther toward the rich so that in 2000-2004, total income tax paid by the top 40% of income-earners grew by 4.6% to 99.1% of the total“.

“This shift may have occurred because as the wealthy (who are arguably the most industrious and productive citizens) are better-incentivized to be industrious and productive through lower taxes, they create higher incomes for themselves and end up paying more taxes. The Bush tax cuts did shift the tax burden, but not in the direction most liberals think.”

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/03/lying_about_bushs_tax_cuts.html

Bill Hedges of MO 7:51PM October 30, 2010

obama does more.

I will gladly discuss who caused mortgage mess and resulting recession. Clue, Bill Clinton, lawyer obama, and Acorn. Jimmy Carter weakly as well.

obama did have program to save homes. FAILED. People in many homes never were qualified. Thanks Bill, lawyer obama, and Acorn. Began by Jimmy.

Selling homes to qualified buyers in only answer. Not "moratorium ". Those who are qualified are being helped.

Banks/cooperations went belly up buying bad loans. Helping people forced upon them by Bill Clinton, lawyer obama, and Acorn.That is helping folks ?

You say "Our problem is that domestic corporations (and individuals through opaque corporations) are quite capable of "buying" what they want (tax cuts) in this election---by lying to voters repeatedly in ads---and they are doing so, courtesy of the club of five Catholic Republican men on the Supreme Court. The USA and its citizens will become weaker as a result."

Answered that in comment you said was "crazy stuff?".

OK when Supreme Court rules for abortion. But not for cooperation ads. Then wrong. When Supreme Court rules, will it be wrong for you if it rules against obamacare ? Is not all about you. Nor wrong because you do not like.

Unlike what obama said, no foreign company may put ads in America. American companies do trade with foreign countries, that is what was discussed.

You mention Bush I will bring in obama. You don't have to mention obama. Not to expect me to is "crazy stuff?"

Bill Hedges of MO 7:38PM October 30, 2010

"Muser" (me) never mentioned Obama or anything about foreign money in the elections. Our problem is that domestic corporations (and individuals through opaque corporations) are quite capable of "buying" what they want (tax cuts) in this election---by lying to voters repeatedly in ads---and they are doing so, courtesy of the club of five Catholic Republican men on the Supreme Court. The USA and its citizens will become weaker as a result.

Do you actually read articles and comments before you respond with crazy stuff?

Muser of NM 2:50PM October 30, 2010

Mary M. Shaffrey

Mary M. Shaffrey

Mary M. Shaffrey is a Virginia-based freelance writer. She was a reporter in Washington for more than 10 years, writing for The Hill, The Washington Times, and the Winston-Salem Journal, before serving as communications director for BIPAC. She is the co-author of the Complete Idiot's Guide to American Government. She is a fan of the Baltimore Orioles and the Providence College Friars.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Latest Videos

advertisement