Christine O’Donnell’s Delaware Win Ensures Dem Control of Senate

September 15, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (11)

It’s clear no party has the monopoly on stupid.

Sen. Robert Menendez, the head of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, is probably the happiest person in America right now. Wonder if he sends Christine O’Donnell a thank you note, or just a bouquet of flowers?

While the odds of the Senate flipping back to the Republicans on his watch were slim, slim just walked out the door with the defeat of Rep. Mike Castle in the Republican Senate primary in Delaware.

[See who donated the most to Castle's campaign.]

Slim then headed down the street, crossed the state line to Menendez’s neighboring New Jersey, and is now drinking a martini on the Boardwalk in Atlantic City. It’s over.

The Republican Party used to pride itself on being the Big Tent Party. It was the party that could elect people like Reps. Connie Morella in Maryland and Bob Michel in Illinois. Both are sadly long gone. Instead, we now have a party that seems long on division, disagreement, and delusion and short on ideas and collaboration.

Was Mike Castle the ideal Republican? No. But there is no such thing. A Republican in Delaware is entirely different than a Republican in North Carolina, California, and dare I say it, Alaska.

The Republican Party was founded on liberty. It was the party of inclusion. Growing up in Maryland, where Republicans are sometimes considered an endangered species, I learned what it meant to be a Republican, or so I thought. My old mentor, Rep. Helen D. Bentley, served for 10 years from 1985-1995. She is the person responsible for defeating “Doc” Long in Charlie Wilson’s War. She taught me when I was in high school that good people come in all political stripes, and not everyone who is Republican should automatically be trusted.

Later as a reporter, I learned from watching some very skilled (and some not so much so) politicians work crowds and give speeches. Some knew their audiences, others didn’t.

The Tea Party and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin came out swinging for O’Donnell. Clearly they don’t know their audience. Has Palin ever been to Delaware? If she had, or any of the Tea Party bigwigs who funneled money had, they would have realized a perennial losing candidate doesn’t have a prayer in the general election compared to a perennial winning candidate who has been in office statewide since O’Donnell was in grade school.

[Check out our editorial cartoons on Sarah Palin.]

For years Republicans chided Democrats and vice versa, for imposing a litmus test on Supreme Court nominees. Now that Republicans in Delaware have bypassed a proven leader, a consensus builder and statesman as their nominee, they have also ensured they will not see a Supreme Court nominee they like because why should they? With Democrats in control, they just cut off their nose to spite themselves.

They won the battle last night, but the war for control of the Senate is lost. So much for the Big Tent—it has apparently gone the way of the Dodo Bird.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Tea Party,
Mike Castle,
2010 Congressional elections,
Congress,
Republican Party,
Sarah Palin,
Robert Menendez,
Christine O'Donnell

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The party of Lincoln was more than the party of inclusion. The party of Lincoln was also the party of immutable values. The party that would maintain it's values even if it meant civil war. Lincoln never believed the truth was relative to maintain his office. BTW, did you ever wonder what happened to Scoop Jackson? Sam Nunn?

Ultimately the voters in Delaware came to the same epiphany as Orwell's creations in animal farm....."The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which." There is no difference between Castle and Democrats on essential issues like Cap & Trade, abortion etc.

One last thing.......weren't a lot of reporters saying the same thing in Florida, regarding Rubio? Kentucky's Rand? Alaska's Miller? etc.

Boo's Dad of MD 2:04PM September 22, 2010

I could only open one of the links. But the link I open was pretty funny. I don't know if it's real or not, but I wouldn't be surprised.

david of ID 3:12AM September 16, 2010

David of ID said: "The first gaff was picking Obama as their darling. They let the bling of Obama blind them. Now the bling is gone and we now know the man behind the curtain. Thanks media . . . you missed that one."

Don't knock on them too hard. They picked up that he looked good in jeans back in the campaign...

http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/fashion/2008/10/28/2008-10-28_urkel_no_more_barack_obama_has_a_hip_new-1.html

...and sparked a business in Rwanda...

http://www.styleite.com/retail/obama-jeans/

...who said the man didn't create jobs?

Rich of CO 2:21PM September 15, 2010

Mary M. Shaffrey

Mary M. Shaffrey

Mary M. Shaffrey is a Virginia-based freelance writer. She was a reporter in Washington for more than 10 years, writing for The Hill, The Washington Times, and the Winston-Salem Journal, before serving as communications director for BIPAC. She is the co-author of the Complete Idiot's Guide to American Government. She is a fan of the Baltimore Orioles and the Providence College Friars.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Latest Videos

advertisement