Clarence Thomas Is the One Who Should Apologize, Not Anita Hill

October 22, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (30)

Since none of Ginny Thomas’s friends have stepped up, I’ll say it: Sister, whatever it was that set you off, it’s time to take your business out of the street and talk to your man. He's the one with the answers you seek. On the one hand you have to admire Thomas’s ability to remain so steadfast in her denial for more than 20 years. On the other hand, placing that call at 7:30 a.m. on a Saturday morning, seemingly out of the blue, suggests that something or someone is threatening to shatter her state of denial.

I’ll never forget the sound of the phones in Democratic Sen. Alan Cranston’s Los Angeles field office ringing off the hook for days, as Californians called, urging him to vote against confirmation of Clarence Thomas. Even before Anita Hill testified, Thomas’s own state of denial became clear as he sat and talked about having “pulled himself up by his bootstraps.” Those words played right into the imagery and hit the proper rhetorical notes. But they contradicted Thomas’s previous statements and professional record, which time and again demonstrated an inability or unwillingness to recognize that not everyone in America has access to a pair of boots with which to even try to pull themselves up. Ironically, as chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, he was responsible for protecting workplace rights--like the right not to be sexually harassed. That should have been enough for him to be deemed unfit to hold a position of responsibility for equally protecting the rights of those who are powerless.

Then the FBI interview with Anita Hill became public.

It seems almost impossible now when remembering that in 1991 we didn’t really acknowledge, much less talk about, sexual harassment. Certainly not as an unacceptable abuse of power. Most of the time if you did say something you were (and sometimes still are) told you were exaggerating, it must have been a misunderstanding, or that it was all in your mind. Anita Hill unintentionally became a hero to myself and many other women because in telling the truth, she gave voice to our experience and reminded us that it’s not a misunderstanding if you feel unsafe or victimized in your workplace. On the positive, that painful moment in history sparked a debate in communities across the country that has helped us move forward. Rather than denying what was happening, issues were put on the table to be dealt with.

Now, 20 years later, you don’t call someone at the office at 7:30 a.m. on a Saturday if you really want to reach them and talk about such a dramatic moment. Which is why it's hard to believe that Thomas truly believed Hill would call her back and apologize for telling the truth. Or that they’d have some girl chat to clear the air about a misunderstanding and end up buddies. The only person who still has something to explain and apologize for is Clarence Thomas. So Ginny, go handle your business.

Tags:
Clarence Thomas,
working women,
Supreme Court,
Democratic Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (30)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Ms. Hill was brave enough to expose this misogynist in an area where such behaviour would be waved away. That Ginny in her probably ginned state cannot live with this is really her own fault.

1. Ms. Hill took a polygraph test and passed- Thomas refused

2. other women wanted to testify but were blocked by the powerful backers of this man

3. now we have the forthcoming memoirs from a former flame who has said that the Thomas she knew fitted in with the allegations made against him.

Ginny chose to stay with a pervert and has to lie on that bed and deal with it rather than drag a wronged woman (that is her claim and she stands by it and more power to her) through this cowardly call hidden as an olive branch but is infact a passive aggressive act.

Ms. Hill cannot be forces to assuage Ginny's insecurities (or could she have just been a tool to deflect the disclosure of the undisclosed funding?).

mukeye of PA 4:24AM October 25, 2010

My daughter and I remained glued to the TV set for the entire hearing while the river of denial flowed through the Senate and House of Representatives and the Supreme Court. Anita Hill was indeed a class act. It takes a lot of courage to be the bell ringer, regardless of subject and whether male or female.

A woman always knows the truth if she really WANTS to know. Surely Ginny knew more confirmation was coming through the current issue of a major and generally well respected magazine.

Carolyn (Lamb) of VA 9:00PM October 24, 2010

I find it interesting the choice of one significant word chosen by ginny thomas. In her so called quest for an apology, she implied Ms. Hill did something "with my husband" rather than "to my husband". The world is talking about the allegations Ms. Hill made about clarence. I think ginny is talking about something else. Asking someone what they did "with" another is totally different than asking someone what they did "to" someone. Ginny and clarence are obviously referring to something that we (the public, pundits and analysts) are not aware of. Because from reading and remembering the actual hearings, Ms. Hill did not discuss anything that she and clarence did together. The reference point was always what he did to her or what she did to him. Never, never was there any discussion of what they did together. I wonder why the pundits and analysts have not commented on her odd choice of word. 'm just saying.

M. McNeal of MO 6:49PM October 24, 2010

Karen Finney

Karen Finney

Karen Finney is a political analyst for MSNBC and an independent consultant working with political and corporate clients in the areas of political and communications strategy. She brings over 16 years of experience in national politics and campaigns ranging from the Clinton administration to New York State to the Democratic National Committee.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

A Democracy in Crisis

Can the country long survive an ever-growing government?

Latest Videos

advertisement