George W. Bush's Legacy is No Laughing Matter

January 30, 2012 RSS Feed Print

You'd think he'd have the decency to stay at home.

Yes, you'd think he'd be under house arrest with his wife and dog, Spot, in Crawford, Texas.

You'd think he'd show penance for the biblically bad 21st century he has visited upon us, complete with a flood and seven years of famine after seven years of feast.

But no, there he was, a free man dressed in white tie at the gathering of the elite Alfafa Club dinner in Washington.

Former President George W. Bush came to this annual jokefest with co-conspirators, brother and former Gov. Jeb, and old-school father and former President George H.W. Bush.

[See a photo gallery of Bush's legacy.]

(I think of them as the three Macbeth witches: "Where shall we three meet again? In Florida, Texas, or in Maine?")

The parched Bush presidency in the American people's book is no laughing matter. We are still paying the price—in the trillions—for his wars.

But at this fancy dinner, Jeb showed just how much his family cared about that, in posing a joke to George: "Who put you in charge?"

The answer: "And George says, 'The Supreme Court, five to four.'" That brought the house down. Very nice.

Sandra Day O'Connor, the outgoing club president, lent even more reality to the show, since she cast one of the five votes in the 2000 Supreme Court decision.

O'Connor made no secret of her Republican partisanship in the tense days of vote counts leading up to the decision. She will always have her name tarnished on that historical disgrace.

But why cry when you can laugh instead? Nobody at that dinner has to worry about putting food on the table. The mighty like having a few presidents on the menu.

[Read former Supreme Court Justice Stephens on the Bush v. Gore decision.]

President Barack Obama came with first lady Michelle, but they did not stay long to soak up the scene of lavish excess: the Washingtonian establishment laughing at their follies.

Good for the Obamas, leaving early. A scolding to George W. Bush for going out in public and making merry. He's a walking reminder of the shambles left in his wake. Go home, sir, and stay there.

Let's face it, if the 21st century was a Broadway show, it would have closed a long time ago.

My father likes to say the 43rd president left a K.I.T.E for Obama to fly in 2009: Katrina, Iraq, Terrorism and the Economy.

Obama has done pretty well on those fronts, but he should not have to sit long at a table in the presence of his enemies.

Tags:
Jeb Bush,
Sandra Day O'Connor,
George H.W. Bush,
Barack Obama,
George W. Bush

Reader Comments Read all comments (20)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

That should be A K.I.T.E. for President Obama,Afghanistan should be in the rotten legacy as well.

Terri Moore of OH 10:17AM March 06, 2012

You are so full of B/S. You're nothing more than a liberal wacko, trying to tarsh a good man. Why don't you wise up and get a real job and quit spreading your poison comments around, us true americans are gagging on.

Jake of MO 1:04PM February 25, 2012

I quote:

Fannie Freddie Follies

Joe Nocera gets it right.

It’s worth noting, as Joe does, that when you hear the AEI guys asserting that Fannie and Freddie bought lots of “subprime and other high-risk” mortgages — which often gets truncated to assertions that they bought lots of subprime — you are being conned. There’s not much actual subprime in there, and the “other high-risk” turns out to be not all that high risk, and nothing at all like subprime.

But why did Fannie and Freddie have to be bailed out? Basically because they had virtually no capital, so that even though their losses as a percentage of assets were smaller than private institutions, the losses were still enough to put them underwater.

None of this is meant to defend what F&F did or how they behaved. But there’s no contradiction between the assertion that F&F were bad institutions run by bad people, and the assertion that they played no important role in creating the financial crisis. The widespread belief that they did play such a role is the result of an effective right-wing disinformation campaign, not serious analysis.

PFred of NJ 12:27PM February 16, 2012

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Elizabeth Stiehm is a writer and journalist in Washington. For 10 years, she was a reporter for the Baltimore Sun and, prior to that, the Hill. She is working on a biography of Lucretia Mott.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

The Catholic Bishops vs. the Nuns

The Vatican is criticizing its dedicated female servants when it should be giving them a larger role.

Latest Video

advertisement