Obama Adept Abroad, Inept at Home

October 25, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Former President George W. Bush, send a Texas-size thank you note to POTUS—Barack Obama just saved your neck by ending the war in Iraq, which you waged with no provocation.

Eight years of war exacted a toll of a trillion dollars paid by the American people, thousands of all-volunteer Army soldiers who came home dead or maimed, and Iraq's uncounted casualties and ravaged civil society.

With that end in sight and the latest from Libya—a dictator's death and regime change—a dichotomy has emerged in the third autumn of Obama's presidency. Adept abroad and weak at home is the reputation he has earned.

[See photos of unrest in Libya.]

The president's finesse in foreign policy comes close to a golden touch. He picked up the pieces of Bush's military adventures and conducted the swift Osama bin Laden kill in a cozy walled compound—not the cave we heard about for years. Facing voters next fall, surely he'll remind them of this rip-roaring Navy SEAL success in Pakistan as well as quelling the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan— and refrain from crowing he's "a war president."

Enigmatic and elegant to friends and foes alike, Obama's not as deft on the domestic front. Here at home, Obama has disappointed seas of supporters and independent voters who judge him starkly on the sadsack economy alone. Never mind healthcare reform. The cool head in the Oval Office doesn't get it: Joblessness is the war at home.

Another Texan president comes to mind as Obama's opposite. Lyndon B. Johnson's five years in the 1960s were a sharp contrast of social progress at home and a tragic war in Vietnam. In the end, America's only lost war tore the country and his presidency apart. He never got much of a thank you note for his landmark civil rights legislation. Johnson serves as a useful cautionary tale for Obama, not to veer to one extreme at the expense of the other.

When 14 million or more are unemployed and young people are camping out to "occupy" Wall Street in a mushrooming movement of discontent, you have a problem, Mr. President. Everyone knows someone who knows someone who is looking for work, be they 22 or 55. A whole generation of people near or at retirement age are holding on to their jobs longer out of financial fears, freezing the usual flow in and out of the workforce. Recent college graduates, awakening from apathy to anger, are losing faith the American dream will work for them.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Occupy Wall Street]

Yet it took two and a half years in office before Obama described the Great Recession haunting his entire presidency as an "emergency." Six weeks ago, he acted appropriately in a time of serious scarcity. He introduced a jobs bill; yet his party can't pass it in Congress. Americans struggling to save their houses, jobs, and families finally heard a note of urgency in his voice.

But they also knew Obama earlier agreed to extend the Bush tax cuts for the well-off, instead of restoring the Bill Clinton tax code. Ultimately, Obama has not shared a sense he "feels your pain," so to speak, to bread and butter middle-class voters who made no gains over the last decade. In governing at home, he doesn't project a fundamental sense of fair play being violated on Main Street in favor of corporate excess and a widening income inequality gap.

Looking back to Johnson, he signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 before he became embroiled in the Vietnam War. He felt the bill's justice in his bones and politicked in the Senate and House as only he could, in a down-home, up-close way. Lawmakers found it hard to say no to Johnson as he wheedled, threatened, coerced, and bargained with them right in their faces or on late-night calls as he worked overtime. Same went for the so-called Master of the Senate's "Great Society" initiatives. For him, governing was personal.

[Read: Martin Luther King Joins Jefferson and Lincoln on the National Mall]

For a cerebral president like Obama, the globe is a chessboard of sorts, a game that takes place indoors with a small circle of advisors, in a secure room removed from the action. For a passionate president like Johnson, domestic policy comes easily as a ground game and contact sport, with lawmakers and constituents.

Obama summons more heart, soul, and empathy when he campaigns. To avoid Steve Jobs's blunt prediction he'll be a one-term president, he must show those sides as he governs on the hurting home front.

Tags:
Lyndon Johnson,
Obama administration,
Osama bin Laden,
economy,
Barack Obama,
politics,
Libya,
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (15)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Oh brucetee, same old same old... Is more like Democrats was pounding the wars drum before Bush ever took office. STOP RE-WRITING HISTORY. Stop self-polling.

Where is your poll for “the fact is that most open- minded people know that the far right,people like cheney and rumsfield"cooked the books",cherry picked,and generally put out bogus information about saddam hussein and WMD.this was done as a reason to start an unwarnted military action in iraq.”

How many times must I quote Democrats that differs with your “cheney and rumsfield"cooked the books",cherry picked,and generally put out bogus information about saddam hussein and WMD.this was done as a reason to start an unwarnted military action in iraq.”

These Democrat votes was before and after Bush:

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."

--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."

--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."

--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."

--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."

Letter to President Clinton, signed by:

-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."

-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."

-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."

Letter to President Bush, Signed by:

-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."

-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."

-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."

-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."

-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."

-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."

-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"

-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."

-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."

-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."

-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

http://www.davidstuff.com/political/wmdquotes.htm

Bill Hedges of MO 1:58AM October 27, 2011

R.L. Schaefer, you just said everything I was thinking. Are these people truly that blind to reality? I never thought the "Arab Spring" was anything but an Islamic revolution that's going to hurt us in the end.

Obama is worse than Jimmy Carter. I wish we had a Reagan waiting in the wings. Instead we have Romney and Perry.

Cindy of TX 4:18PM October 26, 2011

the fact is that most open- minded people know that the far right,people like cheney and rumsfield"cooked the books",cherry picked,and generally put out bogus information about saddam hussein and WMD.this was done as a reason to start an unwarnted military action in iraq.

the congress voted for the war with iraq based on the bougus information given to them by cheney and his crew.

it;s now time for the people of iraq to stand on their own and defend what we gave them.

bruce b of NV 1:53PM October 26, 2011

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Elizabeth Stiehm is a writer and journalist in Washington. For 10 years, she was a reporter for the Baltimore Sun and, prior to that, the Hill. She is working on a biography of Lucretia Mott.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement