To Succeed, Obama's State of the Union Needs Optimism

January 25, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

To be magisterial, President Obama must speak from his head and his heart tonight in the Capitol as he addresses Congress and the nation in the annual State of the Union speech.

To give a great soaring speech, he must blend poetry into the prose.

[Take the poll: What should Obama's State of the Union focus be?]

Campaigning for office, he was often more eloquent, with words more heartfelt, than we've heard during his two-year presidency. From his inaugural address on, he was fairly one-note through hard times until the Arizona shooting rampage, when he fittingly captured our collective shock and sorrow. Showing his heart to the American people may be why his approval rating rose this month.

So to continue in that direction, he must look over the partisan divide in the chamber, the incoming fire of the new House Republicans and Tea Partyers, and serenely talk to you, me, and fellow Americans. Then get a little worked up about the stakes involved in the state of things. He should not fail to remind us we are still in a costly war in Afghanistan and to level with citizens about the timetable. And another well-deserved dig at the Supreme Court would not go amiss. [Take the poll: Should Supreme Court justices attend the State of the Union?]

Now at the mid-point, Obama has a tremendous chance to consolidate all sides of self we've seen so far and make them fit together. For this rather private man, it will be a bit of a stretch to go more public and open up to invite us in. Yet that is the task.

The country will be watching to see if the president can combine emotion and reason, grief and passion, and determination with collegiality, to name a few opposites. He has to hold them in his hand and then, with rhetorical sleight of hand, leave us willing to believe in his vision and optimism.

For an American president to succeed for the ages, nothing matters more than optimism. Franklin D. Roosevelt managed to convey it just with his jaunty tone and turn of phrase during dark hours of history. Ronald Reagan was also a master of the art of optimism. Lincoln is known as a "tragic optimist" because he believed the Union would prevail despite the Civil War bloodshed. The failure to inspire optimism, that signature American trait, was perhaps the fatal flaw of Jimmy Carter's presidency.

Presidents are still symbolic vessels for the republic's psyche. In a way, they are a looking glass for how we see ourselves. Image and performance art aren't everything, but they count for a great deal. [See photos of the Obamas behind the scenes.]

Obama has much of this mastered, and tonight is showtime. He must depart from his customary cerebral mode and show plowshares of passion and compassion, show that he cares about our destiny—not abstractly, but in a hands-on practical sense. It was Harold Ickes, Sr., an FDR New Dealer, who said people have to eat three times a day. For Obama, joblessness is an everyday plight he has yet to publicly confront.

Finally, since the Super Bowl is much on our minds, comes the question of offense or defense: Which should the president play this evening? Despite the Democratic loss of the House, I say civility requires a mighty offense with a hint of a smile on his face, daring opponents to cross him. The newly arrived opposition needs to be a bit humbled by the grandeur of his office.

After all, Obama is the president of the United States of America, and this pageant of democracy is the closest we come to political opera. At center stage, the president has every reason to turn in a command performance.

Tags:
State of the Union,
Democratic Party,
Tea Party,
Barack Obama,
Republican Party,
Congress,
national security terrorism and the military,
unemployment,
Supreme Court

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I would like to respond to the current accusations that sustainability equals communism, and Commissioner Richard Rothchild's thoughts on what sustainability means, as these views do not define what the word means to me.

To me, sustainability has nothing to do with the government, regulations or a communist plot to try to usurp our capitalist society. Perhaps I should let those who agree with these ideas have that word and give my definition of sustainability a new name. Neil Ridgely called it stewardship, and that is a good synonym. But the goal of leaving our place in as good if not better condition than we found it doesn't have many synonyms. Maybe it's time to invent some new words.

I was taught by my Republican, conservative father to pick up trash. That littering was a sin. Turn off the lights. Turn your nose up at the dime on the floor, God forbid, that is 10 cents. To me, sustainability defines these ways of living.

It means using less, so human life is less taxing on the natural resources we rely on. Choosing to use less paper and plastic by bringing cloth bags to the store, using cloth diapers, cloth scrub rags, gardening without synthetic fertilizers or pesticides, eating local food, including meat, preserving local or homegrown food for the winter, mending clothing to make it last, using good old-fashioned baking soda and vinegar to clean and reusing or recycling valuable resources. These are things that were commonplace 70 years ago. These very reasonable actions happen to be good for our pocketbooks, and they happen to also be good for the planet.

These activities are neither sinful nor covert. They demonstrate a very practical and considerate way to live.

Some clarification of terminology needs to be made here because many of us in Carroll County value something we call sustainability. And if this word's definition is totally and completely off base for one of our elected officials or fellow residents, we have cause to worry. Call it stewardship, preserving, considerate living, conscious living or local living. Whatever you want to call it, it is a far, far cry from conspiracy and communist plots.

Hatin' on RR in CC of MD 6:39PM January 31, 2011

UN Agenda 21 - Coming to a Neighborhood near You

By Scott Strzelczyk and Richard Rothschild

Most Americans are unaware that one of the greatest threats to their freedom may be a United Nations program known as Agenda 21. The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development created Agenda 21 as a sustainability agenda which is arguably an amalgamation of socialism and extreme environmentalism brushed with anti-American, anti-capitalist overtones.

A detailed history on sustainable development, definitions, and critical actions can be found here. Section III of the Agenda 21 Plan addresses local community sustainable development. The Preamble and Chapter 28 discuss how Agenda 21 should be implemented at a local level. The United Nations purposely recommends avoiding the term Agenda 21 and suggests a cleverly named alternative: "smart growth." The United Nations Millennium Papers - Issue 2 (page 5) says this of Agenda 21 and smart growth:

Participating in a UN-advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy-fixated groups and individuals in our society such as the National Rifle Association, citizen militias and some members of Congress. This segment of our society who fear 'one-world government' and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined 'the conspiracy' by undertaking LA21. So, we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management, or smart growth [emphasis added].

Undoubtedly, residents of any town, county, or city in the United States that treasure their freedom, liberty, and property rights couldn't care less whether it's called Agenda 21 or smart growth. A recent example of this can be found in Carroll County, Maryland, where a smart growth plan called Pathways was drafted by the County Planning Department. The plan, if enacted, proposed a breathtaking reshuffling of land rights:

Rezoning of thousands of acres of beautiful, low-density agricultural farmland and protected residential conservation land into office parks

Down-zoning of agriculture land to prevent future subdivision by farmers

Up-zoning of low-density residential land around small towns into higher density zoning to permit construction of hundreds or possibly thousands of inclusive housing units, including apartments and condominiums

Inclusive housing with placement of multi-family construction on in-fill lots within existing residential single family communities

Endorsement of government-sponsored housing initiatives (subsidies) to ensure healthier, balanced neighborhoods

no boma of CT 7:09PM January 29, 2011

Amazing speech!!! That was excellent!!! Best speech ever!!! Wonderful!!!

Obama12 of FL 11:42PM January 25, 2011

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm is a weekly Creators Syndicate columnist. Her op-eds on politics, culture, and history have appeared in newspapers across the nation, including The New York Times and The Washington Post. She previously worked as a reporter at the Baltimore Sun and The Hill. Jamie's first journalism job was as an assignment editor at the CBS News bureau in London.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement