'Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell' Is a National Shame on Veterans Day

November 11, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (14)

Sun-dappled trees showing off their autumn canopies make this November day in Washington seem sweet and fleeting with the shorter days.

How awfully bright and warm it is for Veterans Day--on the 11th day of the 11th month. The Armistice ending the "Great War" happened on this day about 90 years ago. So horrific was trench warfare, claiming a generation of England's and Europe's young men, that it was supposed to be the war to end all wars--according to world leaders. While the capital seems serene today, the nation has close to 100,000 troops abroad in two unfinished wars. Thousands of our soldiers have laid down their lives in Iraq and Afghanistan.

[Read more about national security and the military.]

Today feels like a precious space for reflection before the rumble returns for the lame-duck session of Congress--a reflection not on the battles and wars we've lost and won, for there have been both in the march of history. The War of 1812, unpopular with the people, was known derisively as "Mr. Madison’s War" and later, when all was said and done in Baltimore and New Orleans, "The War that Nobody Won."

Just a suggestion: I propose we reflect on the number of unknown soldiers who served their country while being homosexual, kind of like driving while black. The magnitude is hard for us to fully take in, but militarys have had gay soldiers and generals always, at least since Alexander conquered the world. The United States is the only Western democracy to have such a punitive policy as "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," instituted in 1993 by President Clinton and Congress as a compromise on human rights and military "readiness" or "cohesion" or "morale." The third part of that uneasy compromise was supposed to "Don't Pursue," by the way. But they did, all four services. They spent a lot of time and money--and readiness, morale, cohesion--on spying on, expelling, and exposing men and women soldiers, marines, sailors, and airmen. It's a shame on our national record, a shadow on so many silenced lives--both in and out of the military, including the storied service academies.

For the record, the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Colin Powell, was none too helpful to his new boss and commander in chief, President Clinton, who really wished to lift the ban altogether. Powell's political judgment has never been great, exalted as he once was--until his infamous United Nations speech on Iraq in 2003. But we won't go there today. At any rate, Powell and then-Sen. Sam Nunn of Georgia are the go-to guys to thank for blocking that reform 17 years ago.

President Obama would like to do the right thing by allowing gays to serve openly in the all-volunteer force we have today, which puts itself in harm's way. But his administration has told the courts they would like the policy to be voted on in Congress to make it stick. Once again, that may be too sweetly reasoned and rational for the game being played--even the NFL is going easier on its players in the grand spectacles it stages, but Washington is more like the ancient Roman Coliseum.

Even more to the point, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said this week: Let's get it done already. He supports lifting the ban, which is the first time a secretary of defense has done so. That is an incredible gift, like manna falling, but Gates will be gone soon (to retire) and an even more fractious Congress is coming to town. The new Republican House, come January, would just love to vote on this. Don't let them do it, Mr. President.

America's most mercurial senator, John McCain, has changed his mind again and sadly, he's a principal obstacle to this historic legislation. Admitting women to the military and the service academies happened only by laws passed not even 40 years ago--not because the military realized that was the right thing to do. Obama should sit down with that proud son and grandson of Navy admirals, a prisoner of war and a war hero, and see if they can't champion this progress together. End the year on an up-note before the darkness sets in.

[See where McCain gets his campaign money.]

Just like this late autumnal afternoon, there's just enough light and time before us to witness passage of a law to permit gays to serve openly in the military. Don't the let the hour pass, my friends--civilian and military. This affects us all.

Tags:
Robert Gates,
Iraq,
Colin Powell,
Barack Obama,
John McCain,
veterans,
Congress,
War in Afghanistan (2001-),
Bill Clinton,
Iraq war (2003-2011),
national security terrorism and the military,
Afghanistan,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

As a society, not everything can be allowed to become common day events. We all know that homosexuality exists, we all know that it has existed for a very long time and will, not probably, but will continue to exist for as long as humans exist. The issue here is acknowledging what is right, and I'm not talking about religion or your opinion of right verses my opinion of right, we're talking about humanity.

If homosexuality is normal than hetrosexuality is abnormal, but as we are a two sex species, it is impossible to argue that hetrosexuality is abnormal, this is how nature has made us to exist, not as a single sex species, and certainly not as a homosexual specias.

Homosexuality exists in humanity but it is an abnormality, going 100% against nature.

Down the road from where I grew up was a man who lived with two women. He had children with both and always referred to both as his wives. He loved both of them dearly and they loved him and the whole bunch always appeared to be a happy family. Despite all this though, his "family" was and still is considered wrong, but yet within the rules of nature, his "family" was certainly normal while homosexuality will never be.

An arguement for maintaining DADT is simply for doing the right thing, what's right for society, what's right for humanity, not subcoming to the desires of the few and selfish. We can acknowledge that something is going on without feeling that everyone has a right to do whatever they want simply because they're happy doing it. Is a man living with two women who are sisters, who both love the same man, any worse than a man who likes performing oral sex on other men?

Homosexuality is dehumanizing, being black is not, so to compare DADT to Rosa Parks is absurd.

At the sametime though, no one should advocate violance against homosexuals simply for being homosexual.

ELNIKO7 of CA 12:25PM December 01, 2010

Let's stop the pretenses. There are gay people who are wonderful and gay people who are lousy. There are gay people who are bankers, lawyers and teachers and gays who are thieves and felons.

The truth is that gays are among us and so what? What they do in private is their business. That's why we need a National Gay Day. Just as people who wore armbands to identify themselves as Jews and to indicate their solidarity with Jews, we as caring individuals should do the same. Let's stop the tyranny against Gays--both young and old. I am not Gay but I would be proud to wear a symbol that indicated my support and solidarity with Gays.

Enough said!

Pat B. of NY 12:39AM November 15, 2010

Ones personal life is their own. Following orders is the routine on duty. With strict regard to regulations and conformity. In step march. Sharpe salute to ranking personnel except under certain circumstances. Personal expression not part of the drill at any time on duty.

Don’t ask don’t tell seems to me to fit this ridged life style. You can not wear gold chains in uniform. Have on dress shoes while in everyday uniform. As always conformity. This applies to all. Each of us are individuals off the clock. Whatever we may be.

Frankly, why is my political beliefs a subject of on duty importance. I am a number, part of a unit. Part of a force with a objective in battle. I could be rich, poor, black or white. Even gay. Only my color is obvious. No distraction from the job.

Gays are not being ask to do anything different than anybody else. Heterosexuals keep it under their hat when working too. Else face disciplinary actions...

Bill Hedges of MO 6:13AM November 14, 2010

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm is a weekly Creators Syndicate columnist. Her op-eds on politics, culture, and history have appeared in newspapers across the nation, including The New York Times and The Washington Post. She previously worked as a reporter at the Baltimore Sun and The Hill. Jamie's first journalism job was as an assignment editor at the CBS News bureau in London.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement