George W. Bush's Book and Proud Republican Ignorance

Reader Comments

Back to blog

Hard to read such garbage from a liberal fanatic. Amazing the author can't see we're now in a deep well compared to ditch with Bush! These writers seem so confused looking for excuses for Tuesday election results...VOTERS LET PEOPLE KNOW THEY DON'T LIKE THE CURRENT AGENDA AND WANT A CHANGE. It's not Obama's inability to communicate, it's his inability to govern for the people.

BD of PA 2:29PM November 09, 2010

As I see it, the only difference between liberals and communism, is that liberals don't have balls enough pick up a gun and force their lunacy on the masses. Little Jaime should thank people like George W Bush for giving him the right to vocalize his liberal stupidity. Reagan was right - there is so much that liberals know that just ain't so...

Tim of FL 2:07PM November 09, 2010

Your ignorance is comical! Bravo R.L. Schaefer of CA!!

Did you happen to catch the results of the latest elections...

G. Rushing of KS 1:58PM November 09, 2010

No Jamie, there were plenty of good reasons - but that's irrelevant. The fact is that "elective war" should never be undertaken without a substantial expectation of enduring victory. History is a good teacher, and it should be obvious that no lasting, positive change will be achieved by our sacrificed soldiers and wasted material.

Perhaps I should clarify that statement. America certainly could have won, but from the beginning it was obvious that we were not willing to do what was necessary to win.

So Jamie, amazingly we agree - though for different reasons.

You go on to blather about conservatives being uneducated in "matters of political and cultural history" . I think perhaps that you, being a victim of leftist institutions of learning, have mistaken indoctrination for education. I would suggest to you that well grounded sensibilities, character and clear thinking will avail the nation more benefit than the pseudo intellectual hogwash ladled over students by progressive professors.

Your comments regarding your idol, Russ Fiengold, quoting a Bob Dylan song during his concession speech were touching. I think it would have been equally fitting had Ron Johnson, during his acceptance speech, quoted those great R&B artists "Sanford-Townsend", "Smoke From a Distant Fire", "This lying, and cryin's upsettin' and getting no where -

It don't stack up, so slack up and pack up, I just don't care -

Don't let the screen door hit you, on your way out...

R.L. Schaefer of CA 12:34PM November 09, 2010

How do people like this, with no facts whatsoever at hand, get to write a column or blog here? It amazes me.

Let's start at the top--and start there, as I really can't get much farther than that. Let's also try to forget the last two dismal years of President Obama and go back, where this writer wants us to stay, to the Bush years.

This character accuses Bush as being as "smug as ever about the bloody war in Iraq." Totally false. The fact is that the failure to find WMD's in Iraq still haunts President Bush--but this idiot blogger has not even read any excerpts from President Bush's book and is inventing stuff out of whole cloth. History would also tell us--but not this goofball Jamie Stiehm--that John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton and a whole host of Democrats also supported the war in Iraq. Facts don't matter to this jerk.

Then also reflects on the "deadlock" of the 2000 election. The deadlock was hardly Bush's fault, it was the fault of the inept Florida voting system and punch cards. This writer also, conveniently, forgets to tell us that every single recount during and after the Supreme Court decision showed that George Bush won the 2000 election fair and square.

I'll leave it to the rest of you to wallow further in Jamie Stiehm's misleading and inaccurate recollection of history. You should also know (as you won't learn it from "historian" Stiehm) that because of the political stress and personal attacks directed at President Jackson's beloved wife--before he took office--her health failed and she died without ever seeing the inside of the White House.

sherlockHolmes of NH 12:03PM November 09, 2010

Extremists, such as yourself, either left or right, are a major source of discord in our country. Such extreme egotism and narcissism! "The level of cultural and political illiteracy...is staggering" !?! Matthew 7:3-5 addresses this issue, ("Hypocrite! First get rid of the log in your own eye; then you will see well enough to deal with the speck in your friend's eye.") but I wonder how biblically illiterate we are.

James of MS 9:47AM November 09, 2010

Jamie Elizabeth Stiehm is a liberal with a closed mind. All politicians (democrats and republicans) are guilty of the mess we're in right now. President Bush first, and now President Obama for loosing perspective on what needed to be done and how. Bush is an honest man admitting his faults and owning up to the wrong decisions he made. We miss truly him, although I am a liberal myself.

Carles S. Rodezno of TX 9:44AM November 09, 2010

Bush has known class always, no more so than after going out of office. Political retirement. Unlike senile remarks by Jimmy Carter, a very sad ex President.

Interviewers wish G.W. to respond to allegations by obama, as well as his actions. But Bush acts as a elder dignified ex-President letting history make the call. Bush displays decorum, unlike obama. Sadly, neither does Jamie Stiehm.

Jamie:

1. Well deserved bruises. Will leave lasting scares to face. Town hall meetings forecast Nov. 2. As well as previous early election. You all saw the polls. Ignoring it all, 864 Republicans elected, devastation going back to 1932. Jamie, you all earned your scares. Will you learn ? From reading this article. Ah NO.

2. What part of the two wars are you against. You wisely left out Afghanistan, you know your beloved was for that war. Your leadership was for Iraq war, until fashionable to be against. You know, POLITICALLY CORRECT. Quotes last forever on net you know:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp

3. Jamie, Bush has charm, as well as a sense of humor. He was also one who shakes hands with the crew when giving personal interviews as President. Be nice Jamie.

4. Bush wanted to stay out of midterm election, keeping his word to release his book afterwards.

Before getting into you crusade against Sarah & TEA, I must prepare for opening bell. Afternoon delight will bring me back to Jamie. Till after 3:00 p.m..

Bill Hedges of MO 9:21AM November 09, 2010

Ms. Stiehm, 50 yrs from now historians will look back on President Bush and realize that he wasn't so bad of a President. He had no plans to go into the Middle East during his election. Instead wanted to focus on internal and domestic issues. But 9/11 happened. This event was out of his hands and he responded like any good President should. He listened to his intelligence agencies and made the best decision he could find. America, if you care to remember history yourself, at the time was not wanting to sit down and talk with Bin Laden. Instead, America was ready to strike back and with good reason.

Again the intelligence agencies reported WMDs in Iraq, a nation that was not favorably disposed to us or our allies in Afghanistan or in Israel. Again President Bush chose what appeared to be the best option at the time. Hind sight is always 20/20. His only mistake there was wanting to set up a democracy in a land where democratic ideas are completely foreign and incompatible with their way of life.

Katrina was a disaster that no one could have stopped. In fact, Louisianna wouldn't let the national government help until things were well out of hand. And when the administration did get in they found that the entire situation was all but hopeless. An incompetent ninny was mayor who refused to take any pratical solutions in aiding the evacuation. But the citizens of New Orleans deserved him since they re-elected him after the disaster.

The housing market goes back to the Clinton administration. In the words of President Obama, "Bush inherited that mess."

Bush wanted to reform Social Security by creating individual private accounts. This would keep the government out of our retirement savings. Plus, you would get out whatever you put in. But our benevolent and obviously "sane" Democrats at the time decided not to support him.

The one thing he truly got wrong all the around was the No Child Left Behind. Nice thought, but not pratical.

Patrick of KY 8:45AM November 09, 2010

"Often Republicans are better at twisting the truth than Democrats are at telling it."

What irony, huh??

Chris Hampton of GA 8:44AM November 09, 2010

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to blog

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm is a weekly Creators Syndicate columnist. Her op-eds on politics, culture, and history have appeared in newspapers across the nation, including The New York Times and The Washington Post. She previously worked as a reporter at the Baltimore Sun and The Hill. Jamie's first journalism job was as an assignment editor at the CBS News bureau in London.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

A Democracy in Crisis

Can the country long survive an ever-growing government?

Latest Videos

advertisement