George W. Bush's Book and Proud Republican Ignorance

November 9, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (50)

Just as we bruised people begin to brush off the dust from the election, the worst visage of the past came back to taunt us: George W. Bush splashed over the small screen, smug as ever about his bloody war for no good reason in Iraq. No worries about leaving a nation once graced with peace and plenty in tatters and tears in his eventful eight years. Searching for White House likenesses, he reminds one of swaggering 19th century Andrew Jackson, without the charm.

[See a photo gallery of the Bush legacy.]

The exquisite timing of 10 years since the dreadful deadlock of the 2000 election is probably pressing on me, too. After a decade, the only thing I like about Bush is his wife. He is, like Jackson was, uxorious.

Enough about him. He's history--history he'll never read, as he is so fond of saying.

Wisconsin broke my heart, by the way, last week. The Republican governor-elect, Scott Walker, according to Madison's leading piano teacher, seems to know "nothing about everything." Democratic Sen. Russell Feingold, who lost after three terms, in the end showed his class and quoted Bob Dylan's song, Mississippi, "My heart is light and free/I've got nothing but affection for those who sailed with me." He added, "Forward." That's the Wisconsin state motto.

[See a slide show of winners and losers from the 2010 elections.]

Okay, let's go with that tantalizing phrase, "nothing about everything." Doesn't that aptly capture our friends in the Tea Party, first among them Sarah Palin? The level of cultural and political illiteracy among the Tea Party candidates, especially the women, is staggering. Christine O'Donnell and Sharron Angle, along with the curious congresswoman, Michele Bachmann, seemed to have vast empty storehouses of knowledge. Sarah Palin has never gotten caught with her nose in a book. This makes you wonder why Republicans tolerate this know-nothingness in their midst. Then again, there's a proud tradition of Know-Nothings in American history. New York Mayor Bloomberg is more pessimistic: the new class coming to Congress, he said, can't read and don't have passports.

[See editorial cartoons about the Tea Party.]

Soon it becomes clear the Republican men riding the Tea Party wave are not much better than the women (who lost, mostly.) But hey, the new House Republican majority has six weeks to put to good use. Is it too late for them all to start a book club and read the brilliant John Maynard Keynes and his General Theory? Class, after what this economy has been through, aren't we all still Keynesians now? For the record, it's the book of macroeconomic theory that saved the day for the Depression.

[See photos of the Obamas behind the scenes.]

For a nice liberal like me, the rich hypocrisy is that the Iraq War, declared by a Republican president, is the main reason the Treasury is dry and depleted, in debt. So Republicans have a lot of nerve talking about cutting government spending and slashing the deficit after they and the aforementioned president inflicted that war on us and the world. Democrats still standing in the House, don't give an inch of high ground on the hurting economy. Often Republicans are better at twisting the truth than Democrats are at telling it.

Ain't that the truth.

Tags:
Andrew Jackson,
Laura Bush,
Democratic Party,
Russ Feingold,
Iraq,
2010 Congressional elections,
Sharron Angle,
George W. Bush,
Tea Party,
Republican Party,
Congress,
federal budget,
deficit and national debt,
Iraq war (2003-2011),
national security terrorism and the military,
Michele Bachmann,
Sarah Palin,
unemployment,
Christine O'Donnell,
Michael Bloomberg

Reader Comments Read all comments (50)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

You are correct when stating that the American Public bought bonds and paid for WWll, however you are wrong comparing Bond Financing with Deficit financing.

Our government is now spending our Grandchildren's - Great-Grandchildrens money. If we can look up or down in the century to come we will be accursed for what we did to the future unborn.

Pierre of CA 5:35PM December 01, 2010

JLS of CA, where is your head?? WWII was the ultimate stimulus project. It is the thing that proves Keynesian economics works. The big problem with the stimulus that the US government used during the 1930's was that it was too small. During WWII the government spent money like mad. They got the money by borrowing it from the people of the US. That created full employment and a booming economy. That booming economy, in turn, allowed the debt to be paid off after the war.

Among the many blunders of W Bush and his cronies was allowing taxes to be cut and the debt to soar during a time when the economy was doing well. Among the very few smart things President Bush and his boys did was to start the stimulus and bail outs when the economy started to tank. Obama was very smart to follow Bush's lead on that issue.

Jim of CA 1:47PM November 11, 2010

How is it be that your readers can be better informed about such matters than you? "...Nation once graced with peace and plenty...''? The Bush administration began in a recession which followed the 1990s economic bubbles. Keynesian thoery did little to bring the US out of the Great Depression, which was Great precisely because it outlasted all those top-down attempts to remedy things.

It was the economic marshaling during WWII which helped restore the balance between capacities and demand, which was eventually worked out by market evolutions rather than government job creationism. See Amity Shlaes' "The Forgotten Man" for the history. The post-war sidelining of so many statist economies under uncompetitive socialism provided a free run to bottom-up entrepreneurship which reinvented and powered the US well into Internet era.

Today's economic travails had their roots in the 1980s financial deregulations and the freeing of markets which led to a doubling of US GNP to some $20Trillion by 2008. Of which Iraq War expenditures were just a tiny and affordable yearly fraction of 3-4% , far less than the 7-15% of GNP spent on the military during the Cold War.

Your characterization of fellow citizens as sub-par fellows just because they are less immersed in your cultural milieu than those you associate with is the voice of elitism. By your rights most people in the world would be so wanting, so unworthy of recognition. Given your orientation, should your opinions carry weight beyond those of your insular persuasion? From where I originally came from such snobbery is viewed as irrelevant and even a liability in political discourse. Sovereign wisdom is found in the people as a class, not in a class of people.

Get informed, argue from history, work from truths voiced by those of your countrymen who are more well-meaning than well-schooled. You will then travel the less error-filled path.

JLS of CA 11:27PM November 10, 2010

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm is a weekly Creators Syndicate columnist. Her op-eds on politics, culture, and history have appeared in newspapers across the nation, including The New York Times and The Washington Post. She previously worked as a reporter at the Baltimore Sun and The Hill. Jamie's first journalism job was as an assignment editor at the CBS News bureau in London.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement