September 11 Brought Out the Worst Kind of Patriotism

September 11, 2010 RSS Feed Print

The first shattering scene of the 21st century calls forth a reminder, an observation, and a suggestion.

Remember the Tuesday morning of Sept. 11, 2001, before the terrorist attacks? Crystal clear on the Eastern Seaboard, a brilliant turquoise blue sky. The people of the nation woke up in a generally contented mood--but a bit complacent and fat from seven years of peace and prosperity. The U.S. Open had just been played in New York and lawmakers were settling into work in Washington. In Massachusetts, the islands of Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard sparkled in the late summer sunlight. The majority who voted for Al Gore in the tight presidential contest of 2000 were not losing sleep over George W. Bush as the president. And the good times were about to crash.

When three hijacked planes hit their targets out of that blue, we witnessed the burning and falling of the World Trade Center's twin towers, silver symbols of American confidence and might. Yet something else perished with the 3,000 dead. In a screaming flash, we became a nation of fraidy cats timidly hiding behind security blankets, ballasts, and other barriers between a free people. Pearl Harbor brought out the best in us, but September 11 brought out the worst kind of patriotism and unnerved us as a populace. Dissent, a sign of a vibrant democracy, withered on the vine.

Simply put, the world's superpower was undone by 19 Arab men (15 Saudis among them), nine years ago. It was inexcusable for 19 men to defeat our defenses and almost take out the Pentagon. We are still paying the rent on that day. As a result, Bush led the nation into two or three unwinnable wars: Afghanistan, Iraq, and a "global war on terrorism." These trillion dollar wars burnt our 1990s barn harvest. They are the shadows stalking the dismal economy now, make no mistake, along with a host of secret shadowy government programs. Talk about overkill, literally. In the region where war was supposed to be swift—Afghanistan—we are sending door-to-door killers from the Army's elite Special Forces to take out suspected members of the Taliban in the longest war in American history.

[See a slide show of 6 vulnerable terrorist targets.]

Just a reminder: Bush was specifically warned in late August, 2001, that just such a thing would happen. He was on vacation on his Texas ranch and replied rudely to his intelligence briefer. He did not get a bit of blame from the American public, numb with grief and shock. Few knew that truth would become the first casualty of war when weapons of mass destruction (alleged in an ancient land where Bush had a score to settle) was given as the reason to avenge the September 11 attacks.

At home, we were easily led down the garden path by the government--giving a green light to un-American spying and torture methods. We also let little civil liberties get away without a fight, like the right to keep our shoes and socks on at airports and the right to walk up the shining steps of the Supreme Court and enter through the front door. "Homeland security" entered our lexicon as an unlovely phrase that points to something amiss within the walls of our hearts and minds.

Just an observation: We have lost our place in the world as a beacon, thanks to invading Iraq in 2003. That is why the military is desperate to figure out a good way out of Afghanistan, to save our face. However, the Army has taken such a beating over the years that even senior officers speak of the "broken force" with multiple deployments and a rising suicide rate. On our cozy civilian side, it's way too easy to spare pain and declare war with an "all-volunteer" force. As the Vietnam War showed, a draft makes it harder to prosecute an unpopular war. So let's bring back the draft--as a liberal, I'm all for it.

Just a suggestion: That we study war no more and, in so doing, reclaim the optimistic can-do spirit that was our signature character trait. If a sobered America doesn't show the world its best game and values in keeping the peace, no other nation will. That much we know.

And a wish: Call the tragedy September 11, not "9/11," now in vogue. Language matters--so let's not let this lie in memory as an unavoidable accident, but as a preventable (and predictable) event. Just as Pearl Harbor signifies the place, September 11 tells the date, of an unforgettable event after which nothing was the same again.

Tags:
Al Gore,
Saudi Arabia,
economy,
9/11,
George W. Bush,
recession,
Afghanistan,
Department of Homeland Security,
Iraq,
Iraq war (2003-2011),
military,
national security terrorism and the military,
unemployment,
War in Afghanistan (2001-),
Pentagon

Reader Comments Read all comments (56)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I believe we should continue to call IT 9/11, so we don't confuse it with all the fairly normal September 11th's that are in our past.

A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism. 'Very few people were true Nazis,' he said, 'but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.'

We are told again and again by 'experts' and 'talking heads' that Islam is the religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the spectre of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.

The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honour-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.

The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the 'silent majority,' is cowed and extraneous.

Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence.

Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany , they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.

Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late. As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts--the fanatics who threaten our way of life.

Lastly, anyone who doubts that the issue is serious, is contributing to the passiveness that allows the problems to expand. So, extend yourself a bit and send this information on and on and on! Let us hope that thousands, world-wide, read this and think about it, and send it on - before it's too late.

Clifffranks, VietNam Vet of AZ 5:05PM September 15, 2010

i confirm the connexion beetween islam and neo nazis group i see take videos and pictures in south of france all get hate of the free world america yep israel;;;;aswelll;;;;iranian and neo nazis german and south africa selous involds

impossible for me to be ear in france i personnaly thing the 9/11 is result of this al qaida and fascistes european for the logistics ;;;;impossible for me to get the fascistes control the office du tourisme check the name;;;;Joelle esther benyayer

joelle esther benyayer of WA 3:26AM September 15, 2010

a darn thing about Operation Desert Shield/Storm. Anyone who attempts to make a correlation between the Gulf War and OIF should read the declassified reports of what had transpired during the Gulf War. Another good source to read would be the book Germs: Biological Weapons and America's Secret War by Judith Miller, Stephen Engelberg, & William Broad.

If invading Iraq was a goal of G.H. Bush, he probably would have held a meeting with leaders of the nations who provided coalition forces and asked to do so. But where would that of gotten anyone? The goal was to drive Saadam’s forces out of Kuwait and “humble” Iraq. Mission accomplished, for the time being.

What would GH have to accomplish by invading Iraq? Oh, that’s right, it was so he can get rich off of the oil. Can you explain how that would have happen? Thought not.

Ron N. of IL 3:00AM September 15, 2010

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Elizabeth Stiehm is a writer and journalist in Washington. For 10 years, she was a reporter for the Baltimore Sun and, prior to that, the Hill. She is working on a biography of Lucretia Mott.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement