Why Obama Should Let the Bush Tax Cuts Expire

August 2, 2010 RSS Feed Print

The rich people I know wish to see the George W. Bush tax cuts for the wealthy expire--and to have their views counted in by Congress.

To put it plainly, they found his act of lowering taxes on the most well-off Americans, with the nation engaged in two wars, absurd in the first place. All rich people are not as selfish as some would have you believe.

Taken as a whole, Bush's policies brought on more bread, circuses, and bloodshed than the Treasury could afford--and cut sharply into tax revenue. It also caused more deployments than the fine Army could take for nearly nine years, but the "broken force" is a story for another day. For seven years straight during the Bush reign, the government deficit grew at a staggering rate, starting from a position of peace and prosperity in 2000.

Bill Clinton, love or hate him, knew how to grow the economy into a flourishing garden. Bush's economy in retrospect is more like a trashed fraternity house.

[Check out a roundup of editorial cartoons on the economy.]

Let President Obama and congressional Democrats show some horse sense and let the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy--families with income of at least $250,000--die with no ado. They won't lose a single vote this fall. It's a matter of fairness and squareness--in a time of need, the wealthy are actually undertaxed (marginally) compared to the rest of us. I am glad to see Alan Greenspan agrees with me.

If only the other vestiges of Bush's benighted presidency could vanish so easily. If I met the man, would I be able to shake his hand? His fingerprints are all over war-ravaged Iraq, lawless Afghanistan, and the beleaguered United States. The American character is relentlessly upbeat, but its resilient fabric is being stretched past any point I've ever seen.

Most people living today do not remember the Depression in the 1930s--my father, born in 1933, bears some psychological marks, but by the time he was 4 or 5, the nation was beginning to lift out of it, thanks to the creative public works programs launched by the government directed by Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

Only octogenarians (and up) truly remember the Depression. For the rest of us, when we say "in this economy," we mean the worst we've ever seen in our lives. This is no ordinary recession. Like a lifeguard, the federal government jumped in to rescue the drowning auto industry and Wall Street. When it comes to the great middle class and high anxiety about foreclosed homes and joblessness, the lifeguard seems to think we can swim to shore on our own.

With so many American households out to sea financially, the least the president can do is let the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy sink into oblivion.

Tags:
Great Depression,
economic depression,
Congress,
economy,
Barack Obama,
George W. Bush,
recession,
Iraq,
Iraq war (2003-2011),
taxes,
Bill Clinton,
Franklin Delano Roosevelt

Reader Comments Read all comments (38)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

So Gingrich fancies a run for President? So what? One does not have to support him (and this "right-winger" does not) to know that he is pretty good at speaking extemporaneously and that the Kenyan, who is not particulary adept away from his tele-prompter, would fare badly in any kind of real debate.

Bryan of NH 11:14PM August 13, 2010

So, how do you reconcile taking more of my money as 'fair and square'? I don't work as hard for my money? I didn't have to endure 8 years of university to get to where I am now? I didn't have to work hard to get where I am?

This is just ludicrous. If it was more of your money, I'm sure you'd have something to say about it. But because it isn't, because it's "those rich people", of course you think Obama is entitled to take it from me and give it to those he deems to be appropriate recipients. How about the guy who worked for the money? Why shouldn't he get to keep it?

And thanks for basing your entire premise on anecdote. "I know people who..." That always establishes credibility, especially when used in the first line.

Oh no! Does this make me come across as selfish? Well, perhaps where I live it costs most to provide for my family, pay my school bills, buy food, rent, whatever. And if choosing to provide for my family rather than supporting Obama taking my money to provide for his voters makes me selfish, then yes. I am selfishly devoted to providing for my family.

Brandon of CA 12:43PM August 09, 2010

Watch what you ask for , Newt could run circles around Obama any day on any subject . Sure hope to see it .

Hunter of WI 9:56PM August 03, 2010

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Elizabeth Stiehm is a writer and journalist in Washington. For 10 years, she was a reporter for the Baltimore Sun and, prior to that, the Hill. She is working on a biography of Lucretia Mott.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement