Health Reform’s Missing Ingredient: A Charismatic Citizen Leader

December 10, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

By Jamie Stiehm, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Where have you gone, American heroine and suffragette Alice Paul? Your valiant spirit might stir and start street marches in Washington, this time on healthcare reform.

Here your memory lives in some young hearts.

A funny thing happened the other night when I went to a documentary screening at Georgetown University on the woman's suffrage movement, led by Paul nearly a century ago. A standing-room-only audience of 200 students, a handful of professors and the dean of American Studies, Bernard Cook, viewed the shining premiere of the student-produced Remember the Ladies. Among those telling the tale on camera were a congresswoman, a regional park manager (where women were detained), and me. We seized a chance to share some thoughts on someone who was truly great.

While interviewed by the team of Ana-Alicia Siqueiros, Emily Owen, Kelly Sawyers, and Jillian Webb, Georgetown College juniors, I praised the simple power of Paul's revolutionary political strategy. In plain English: No, we can't go home and wait for liberty and history to come calling. We women of the people are not quitting until we have won the vote in Washington. Arrest us, jail us, force-feed us behind bars. There are thousands more of us—your sisters, mothers, and daughters—from every state and we are done with patience.

Fast forward to 2009. With no outside organized force present and visible to lawmakers as they deal, debate, tarry, and perhaps filibuster on the floors of the Capitol this week, Congress will not hear a similar public outcry for universal healthcare. This reform has been waiting in the wings since the 1940s, when President Harry S. Truman tried to put it on the books. Heck, maybe its time has finally come.

Yet a key ingredient—a charismatic citizen leader who deftly wields the drama of civil disobedience—is missing from the mix as the nation comes close to major progress on domestic policy. Furthermore, President Obama is sailing this sea without his most experienced advisers on this treacherous passage—the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy and former Sen. Tom Daschle, who early on withdrew his Cabinet nomination because of tax issues.

The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. provided ringing leadership to his people and called white lawmakers and citizens of conscience to his cause in 1964 when the Civil Rights Act passed. President Lyndon Johnson shrewdly prevailed over the strong resistance of the "southern bull" senators. But he was no doubt buttressed by King, who provided a moral compass and a soaring voice to a mass movement. The two men consulted on the telephone and each appreciated how much he needed the other to get the landmark legislation passed.

Paul, the central charismatic figure in the final phase of the woman's suffrage movement, led the mass movement to victory in 1920. It took several years of strategizing and suffering to make it happen. The president during this period, Woodrow Wilson, was the target of many signs and protests staged right outside his door at the White House gate. A southern intellectual, he made it clear he was not ready to come to the table on woman's suffrage for seven years or so.

Toward the end of his eight years in office, Wilson yielded to political pressure, coming strongly from the western states, and gave a "green light" to votes for women. He was a great man in many things, with a prescient internationalist vision, but not when it came to that.

Wilson and Paul were always antagonists, never close. Schooled in the Victorian and Virginian way of manners, he may have found her unladylike. An alumna of Swarthmore College (class of 1905) in Philadelphia, Paul cut the free-thinking mold for womanhood in the Roaring Twenties. Her family belonged to the Religious Society of Friends (a.k.a. Quakers), long known for their dedication to human rights and peace.

The question surfaced after the student screening: Why don't we know more about her? The four young women looked at each other and said they we were surprised at how many people don't know about the dazzling Alice Paul—except for those who saw her character portrayed by Hilary Swank in an HBO show about the suffrage movement. (Oh, yeah, the one who went on a hunger strike in jail.) Remember her name, ladies and gentlemen.

I bet Obama wishes he could talk to her right now about how to save the public option—getting the voice of the people heard in the streets and halls of this town.

Tags:
healthcare,
healthcare reform

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Alice Paul came from a long line of Republican activists such as Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Stanton. None seem very popular in today's academic climate. Alice Paul is quoted for saying abortion is "the ultimate exploitation of women." And although some pro-abortion groups have attempted to use her lack of direct support on the issue, the fact she was a Quaker and her idea that killing babies was "exploiting women", which was what she devoted her life too preventing; would seem enough to show which side of history her and women like her were on. So given her similarities to modern day women such as Sarah Palin and Mother Teresa, it's no wonder why college professors today, much less students, have no clue about her. Hats off to Georgetown U. for their screening.

And I conquer with the sentiments that Woodrow Wilson reacted more on public pressure than on personal insight, particularly given the idea he is easily one of the most racist and bigoted Presidents in our history. He often tried to espouse himself as a leader for the "average man" but was perhaps one of the most elitist political figures in our history as well. He went to the most elite schools and was even President of Princeton for several years before pretending to become a "man of the people" in Washington.

And frankly, I would not believe conservatives such as Alice Paul would agree with advocating such abuses of Congressional power today like this "universal" healthcare matter. Thomas Jefferson, whom this blog mentions a street named after, certainly would not have.

"They are not to do anything they please to provide for the general welfare.... [G]iving a distinct and independent power to do any act they please which may be good for the Union, would render all the preceding and subsequent enumerations of power completely useless. It would reduce the whole instrument to a single phrase, that of instituting a Congress with power to do whatever would be for the good of the United States; and as they sole judges of the good or evil, it would be also a power to do whatever evil they please."

-- Thomas Jefferson

And for those who prefer a Federalist:

"Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government."

--James Madison

"If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one...."

-- James Madison, letter to Edmund Pendleton, January 21, 1792

And just to further the point:

"When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."

-- Benjamin Franklin

"The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite."

-- Thomas Jefferson

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/september_2009/health_care_reform

Thank you for reading my comments.

Joel of TX 12:11PM January 08, 2010

Here at the Alice Paul Institute in Mt. Laurel, New Jersey we are asked the question regularly - "why don't people know about Alice Paul?" We have several answers to that question but the two most important are: She was a woman and she was considered subversive and militant in her day, and American history doesn't like either of those traits, and especially when combined. The second answer is that Alice herself was not one to bring attention to herself, but only to the cause. She was a shy person by nature, but a brilliant strategist. Her Quaker upbringing made her a modest person and she did not do a good job of documenting her achievements.

Anyone interested in learning more about Alice Paul should visit our website, www.alicepaul.org and our site, Paulsdale, the birthplace and childhood home of Alice. It is a National Historic Landmark. The Alice Paul Institute is dedicated to perserving her home, educating the public about her life and work, developing future female leaders, and working to achieve full equality for women.

She will be inducted into the NJ Hall of Fame in May 2010!!!

Valerie Buickerood of NJ 3:54PM December 10, 2009

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm is a weekly Creators Syndicate columnist. Her op-eds on politics, culture, and history have appeared in newspapers across the nation, including The New York Times and The Washington Post. She previously worked as a reporter at the Baltimore Sun and The Hill. Jamie's first journalism job was as an assignment editor at the CBS News bureau in London.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement