Bob Bennett’s Defeat Shows Extremism in Politics

July 8, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Sen. Bob Bennett is an impressive politician. As a PBS NewsHour segment last night showed, he is a serious, thoughtful official, who believes in the virtue of holding sober debates about idea-driven policies. He had the temerity to shun the politics of angry diatribes that too often passes for mainstream political debate now--and he was defeated as a result. [See who gave the most to Bennett's campaign.]

In discussing his defeat at Utah's state GOP convention this year, he pointed out that "One of the complaints about me was, we don't see you on CNN, we don't see you on FOX screaming. ... You're sitting back there talking to these people, and we don't want that." Bennett made several important points in his interview with Judy Woodruff. He argued that the political anger "being fed by talk show hosts and others ... destroys" everything in its path and leaves nothing in its wake but a gaping void.
 
He highlighted the extremist bent of Tea Party activists that helped unseat him. They came to his events, and they refused to listen to anything he had to say. Instead, they "would hold up their copy of the Constitution, and they would say, if it's not in the Constitution, you shouldn't do it. Well, I'm not quite ready to go that far in my conservative views."
 
Bennett's defeat is a prime example of how fury--directed at Washington politicians, fueled by righteous anger over a damaged economy--can overtake and consume reasonable elected officials, who are willing to work with other principled pragmatists across the aisle on tough issues. Bennett's willingness to work with Sen. Ron Wyden on healthcare and his support for the bank bailout inspired the wrath of his Utah foes. That unorthodoxy partially explains his defeat. He acted in non-ideological ways on two big issues, and he attempted to do what he felt was right. I don't agree with Sen. Bennett on much, but I admire his sober assessment that politics now is too often "divided between the great issues and the great diversions"--and that "great diversions" often misdirect our attention. He deserved better than his stunning defeat by infuriated activists in Utah, who tossed him out for being insufficiently militant on government's role in American life. [See who supports Wyden.]

Tags:
Robert Bennett,
Ron Wyden,
2010 election,
Utah,
Congress,
Tea Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (22)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The centrally planned economy is dead and buried for good. I'm glad of it. But one thing we've learned over the past thirty years is that neither pure communism nor pure capitalism work. They both are based on absolutist dogmas which bear little resemblance to reality. Only a mixed economy will bring the most optimal living standards to the most people. Germany, Sweden, Canada and even the UK had greater average living standards in many ways than the US. US living standards owe as much to government as to the private sector. Without trillions in government spending over the years we'd have chronic double digit unemployment, fully a third of the US population would have absolutely NO access to health care of any kind and we wouldn't have the trained and educated workforce to develop the various technological and other advances we have that have contributed to our high standard of living. Furthermore, highly developed countries like Chile, the UK, the US and Israel that have gone from a Mixed economy or Keynesian welfare state to free market capitalism since 1980 have seen a rapid decline in their middle classes, a rise in average poverty and unemployment rates and an increase in various sorts of social problems in general. And as we should all realize, it was the trade union movements in the US and elsewhere that build the middle classes and created the effective demand to sustain a three decade long era of economic growth immediately after WWII.

We can't revert to the way things were but only move forward. In doing so, we can develop a social democratic agenda to restore stability, equality, security and an economy that works for everyone.

steve of IL 6:04PM July 15, 2010

I hope we never see what you are pushing . It has never worked , anywhere .

I know you progressives think you're so smart and can get it right , so did the people that tried it , people don't want it .

Hunter of WI 6:17AM July 15, 2010

Hunter, I see my contribution to America's greatness as being based on promoting the current political debate on the chronic stagnation of late capitalism. My goal is to foster a debate and eventual political movement for democratic socialism based somewhat on the Swedish model. It was quite successful for a while but the world economic slowdown brought it to an end in the 1990s. Further, Sweden had the advantage of big export markets for consumer durables immediately after the war. Plus, they have a small population. American socialism would work very well if designed correctly. People need to lose their fear of "the S word" in order for the movement to take hold.

American socialism should consist of these basic goals.

*Massive public investment for full employment.

*Renewable energy development and green jobs.

*Steep progressive taxation.

*Support for union rights and higher incomes to rebuild the middle class.

*Massive public investment in a new economy consisting of jobs that can't be outsourced such as mass transit, infrastructure repair and development, alternative energy development, health care including the construction of new hospitals and clinics, education expansion and high tech research and development.

*Strict financial reregulation limiting the size of banks and reducing the overall size of the financial sector. Interest rate controls and a financial transaction surcharge and a steep tax on short term speculative investments.

*Universal, Single payer health care system perhaps in the form of expanding Medicare for all.

*Free Public education and more investment in education in poor neighborhoods.

This is only a start but a good one. I think it would make America a better place for more people.

steve of IL 9:39PM July 14, 2010

Matthew Dallek

Matthew Dallek

Matthew Dallek, a visiting scholar at the Washington-based Bipartisan Policy Center, teaches history and politics at the University of California Washington Center. He is author of The Right Moment: Ronald Reagan’s First Victory and the Decisive Turning Point in American Politics. He worked as a speechwriter for House Democratic Leader Richard A. Gephardt and Federal Communications Commission Chairman William E. Kennard.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Concordia Ship Disaster

The Costa Concordia luxury cruise ship keeled over after it ran aground off the coast of Italy.

advertisement