• Comment ()

Should the Obama Administration Have Urged the Supreme Court to Strike Down Proposition 8?

The administration issued an amicus brief calling for the California law banning gay marriage to be found unconstitutional

March 1, 2013 RSS Feed Print

On Thursday the Obama administration issued a friend-of-the-court brief in the Supreme Court case examining the constitutionality of California law Proposition 8, which bans same-sex marriage in the state. The administration encouraged the court to rule that it is illegal for the state to restrict marriage on the basis of sexual orientation.

Arguing that Proposition 8 violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment, the Obama administration asked the court to examine such laws with "heightened scrutiny." In the amicus brief, it said the law clearly violates the clause:

Private respondents, committed gay and lesbian couples, seek the full benefits, obligations, and social recognition conferred by the institution of marriage. California law provides to same-sex couples registered as domestic partners all the legal incidents of marriage, but it nonetheless denies them the designation of marriage allowed to their opposite-sex counterparts. Particularly in those circumstances, the exclusion of gay and lesbian couples from marriage does not substantially further any important governmental interest.

[See a collection of political cartoons on gay marriage.]

The brief also acknowledged that seven other states—Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon and Rhode Island—also prohibit same-sex couples from marrying, but it didn't request the Supreme Court also rule those laws to be constitutional. Yet it demonstrates Obama's slowly evolving views on the topic: After initially opposing gay marriage, the president came out in support of it in 2012, and has instructed his administration to eliminate various discriminatory federal policies like "don't ask, don't tell" in the military, and instructed the Justice Department to stop defending the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

Supporters of Proposition 8 were "disappointed" by the administration's stance on the case. Andrew P. Pugno, the general counsel for supporters of the law said:

By arguing that Proposition 8 is rooted only in irrational prejudice, the president has impugned the motives of millions of Californians, turned his back on society's longstanding interest in both mothers and fathers raising the next generation, and disregarded the rights of each state to decide for itself whether to redefine marriage.

[Read the U.S. News Debate: Will Obama's Support of Gay Marriage Help Him Politically?]

Adam Umhoefer, executive director of the American Foundation for Equal Rights praised the brief, saying:

It is an unprecedented call to action by our government that it is time to recognize gay and lesbian Americans as full and equal citizens under the law.

The brief comes days after many prominent Republicans also issued an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to strike down Proposition 8.

What do you think? Should the Obama administration urge the Supreme Court to strike down Proposition 8? Take the poll and comment below.

Should the Obama Administration Have Urged the Supreme Court to Strike Down Proposition 8?

View Results

 

Tags:
LGBT rights,
Proposition 8,
Obama administration,
California,
marriage,
Barack Obama,
Supreme Court,
civil rights

Reader Comments ()

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

advertisement