• Comment ()

Sorry, Romney, Presidential Debates Are Rarely Game-Changers

Ford's Poland gaffe and Reagan's devastating "are you better off" question didn't change those races

October 3, 2012 RSS Feed Print

[Check out our editorial cartoons on President Obama.]

Take Ford's famed Poland gaffe: Few people recall that Jimmy Carter's lead over the incumbent shrank over the course of the debate period. And while the single Reagan-Carter debate is recalled as the Gipper's watershed moment where voters finally broke for him, the fact is that Reagan had led in the average of tracking polls since the late spring.

Why don't debates have a greater impact? First, most voters tend to have made up their minds by the time debates occur, a phenomena likely to be exaggerated this year when there seem to be fewer undecided voters than usual.

Second, while the Romney campaign seems to bank on distinct moments in time to turn the race—first the vice presidential rollout was going to restart the campaign, then the Republican National Convention was going to spark a Romney surge—the fact is that elections are akin to aircraft carriers. They generally don't turn on a dime.

[See Photos as Denver Prepares for the First Presidential Debate.]

And this makes intuitive sense. After nearly four years, people have a pretty good sense of Barack Obama, and by now they've developed a notion of Mitt Romney. A debate moment might crystallize voters's views, but the events are not going to change the fundamentals of the race. People like Obama and think that he understands their concerns, and neither statement is true of Romney. And the debates are unlikely to change the fact that Romney is a tone-deaf candidate who has surrounded himself with an inept campaign team; or that he has been crippled by the need to straddle the sizable gap between his base's policy preferences and those of the mainstream voters on issues like Medicare and taxes.

None of this is to suggest that the debates will be devoid of drama. In fact, as I suggested a few weeks ago, there's good reason to think that the debates might provide memorable drama. Suppose the first debate or two pass without the momentum change for which the Romney campaign is hoping. What sort of Hail Mary nonsense might he trot out in his last electoral gasps?

 

Tags:
debates,
2012 presidential election,
Barack Obama,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments ()

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Democrats Should Be Worried About Polls After Obama Scandals

Democrats should be more worried about President Obama's approval ratings.

Tea Party IRS Rally Should Wait Until After Moore Tornado Recovery

Tea party rallies against the IRS should wait until the tornado victims are taken care of.

God Bless America and the Boy Scouts

The Fund does the right thing by pushing the Boy Scouts to lift its ban on gay members.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Show the Failure of Obama's Big Government

Giving an inefficient organization like the IRS more responsibility makes it more likely to screw up, not better able to solve this nation’s problems.

Coburn Wants Oklahoma Tornado Aid Offset With Budget Cuts

Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn wants spending cuts before aid is sent to tornado victims in his own state.

Crowdfunding Zack Braff's Film And Robert Griffin's Gifts Is a Mistake

Rich people don't need donations from the public.

Poll Shows Americans Find Obama's IRS Story Barely Believable

There is still something fishy about the scandal at the IRS.

Do Benghazi, AP and IRS Scandals Reflect Obama’s Leadership Style?

It may be that a flawed leadership style is filtering down to the rest of the government.

advertisement