• Comment ()

Should Libertarian Gary Johnson Be Included in the Presidential Debates?

The third-party presidential candidate is being excluded by the Commission on Presidential Debates

October 3, 2012 RSS Feed Print

The first presidential debate takes place between President Barack Obama and Republican candidate Mitt Romney Wednesday night in Denver, but one candidate will be missing from the stage. Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson is not being allowed to participate in the debate by the Commission on Presidential Debates, the nonprofit organization that runs the events.

The commission, a registered 501(c)(3), restricts access to the debates to candidates who meet certain criteria. It says it uses "nonpartisan, objective criteria" to determine which candidates can participate in the debates: evidence of constitutional eligibility, meaning a candidate meets all of the constitutional requirements to be president; evidence of ballot access, meaning the candidate's name will appear on the ballot in enough states to give the candidate the mathematical ability to secure a majority in the Electoral College; and indicators of electoral support, meaning the candidate must have the support of at least 15 percent of the electorate.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the 2012 campaign.]

Johnson fails to meet the 15 percent requirement in polls conducted by the five polling organizations chosen by the commission, but filed a lawsuit against the organization for unfairly blocking him from participating in the debates. The former governor of New Mexico said the Democratic and Republican Parties are deliberately locking him and the Libertarian Party out of the debates.

"Someone has to stand up and call this what it is—a rigged system designed entirely to protect and perpetuate the two-party duopoly," said Johnson spokesman Ron Nielson. "That someone will be the Johnson campaign."

[See a collection of political cartoons on the Republican Party.]

In protest of Johnson's exclusion, Philips Electronics and the YWCA have both pulled their sponsorship from the debates. Both were inundated with E-mails and letters from Johnson supporters complaining that the Libertarian isn't being allowed to participate.

"I've been trying this since 2004 ... and this is first time any sponsor has peeled off from supporting the commission," says Executive Director George Farah of Open Debates, an election watchdog group. "For this to happen on the eve of the first presidential debate is a remarkable act."

[Check out our editorial cartoons on President Obama.]

Third-party candidates have only before appeared in presidential debates twice. John Anderson participated as an independent candidate in the 1980 election against incumbent President Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, although the three candidates never appeared in a debate at one time. The only other time a third-party candidate who was allowed to participate (and the only instance when the debates were under the control of the Commission on Presidential Debates, which started running debates in 1988) was in 1992 when Ross Perot appeared with President George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton.

What do you think? Should Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson be included in the presidential debates? Click here to take the poll and comment below.

Tags:
Libertarian Party,
Gary Johnson,
2012 presidential election,
Barack Obama,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments ()

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

advertisement