• Comment (13)

America's Gun Culture and Its Effect on the 2012 Election

Paul M, Barrett, author of Glock explains the rise of the handgun and where gun control legislation is headed

April 20, 2012 RSS Feed Print

The last decade or so, the pattern has been a movement toward a liberalization of gun laws, a loosening of gun laws. I don't see anything that's going to stop that pattern in the near future. I don't think you're going to see a future where there's any kind of national uniformity on these things. It's always been the case that gun ownership is more prevalent in some parts of the country than in other parts and I think that will continue. This is a gun culture. It always has been and it always will be. Our iconic images of ourselves include firearms: the minuteman standing with his musket, the cowboy with his six-shooter. This is a part of a lot of people's lives and that's not going to change.

Tags:
gun control and gun rights,
2012 presidential election

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

i personaly think that guns should be allowed to anyone that has a permet. reason being is perhaps you are walking down the street and someone tryes to harm,kill, steel from you. you will have acess to something that will protect you. maybe even if your getting robbed at your home, again you will have acess to protection.

Guns dont kill people, people kill people.

E.cool of WI 2:38PM February 13, 2013

Ownership of arms is ALWAYS the mark of a free man.Obama has already made it perfectly clear where he stands on freedom...he hates it.

"I think it’s a scandal that this president (Bush) did not authorize a renewal of the assault weapons ban." -Barack Obama, 10-21-04"

More research please and less opinion Mr. Barrett.

Steve M of OR 8:25PM May 07, 2012

THE NRA NEEDS A BIGGER TENT...

The NRA must expand its membership and lobbying to include fishermen, boaters, RVers, equestrians, divers, ranchers, farmers, off-roaders and prospectors - as well as manufacturers who produce products and equipment for these groups.

By now it should be obvious that the NRA will have fewer and fewer members as areas open to hunting and shooting are being closed down. Every years millions of acres of our "public lands" are being closed to the public.

Everyday, across the nation, we all pay for the environmental crusade of the “eco-elite”. When a rancher or farmer is forced to stop or curtail operations for one “environmentally correct “ reason or another we all pay in higher food prices. When a utility company can’t produce power because of concerns about nuclear plants or can’t build hydroelectric plants because of a threatened fish or snail, it costs us all. When a home builder can’t build homes for a growing nation without spending millions in environmental studies - the fees are paid by the home buyer. Manufacturers of all types products are shackled by huge costs and fees generated by environmental, regulation, litigation and legislation and when you buy your next car, piece of lumber or box of detergent you’ll be paying.

It seems no price is too great for the “Crusaders of Environmental Purity”. That may be true for the Martin Sheens and the Barbara Striesands and other members of the “eco-elite”, but what about the working people laboring under the ever increasing burden of these costs? Try and explain to a family trying to keep food on the table or staggering under medical bills that it was necessary to spend millions of dollars doing studies and building fences and closing roads to protect some weed, insect or salamander!

And, what about the cost in freedom and the human spirit when access to our lakes, streams, rivers and forests is being lost as the result of draconian environmental regulation?

When the eco-elite demand and litigate that roads and campgrounds be closed do we consider that not everyone is a young, healthy member of the Sierra Club, able to hike many miles into the woods to enjoy nature. Isn’t the disenfranchisement of the handicapped, the infirm, families with young children, the working poor and seniors from the outdoors too high a price to pay? Would we accept this discrimination in any other sector of our society?

Is a legacy of closed roads, abandoned campgrounds, fences, outlawed recreational activities. and high fees for what little recreational opportunity remains really what we want to leave future generations?

The NRA must expand it's lobbying efforts and membership to include all groups and companies who are affected by being disenfranchised from our public wild lands. 20 million+ members would have a lot more clout than 4 or 5 million.

It the NRA doesn't learn this lesson soon they will simply become irrelevant.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 12:03PM April 23, 2012

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

President Obama's Code Pink Heckler Medea Benjamin Was Plain Rude

It's become acceptable for people to interrupt the president while he is delivering a formal speech on a deadly serious topic.

Obama Commerce Nominee Penny Pritzker’s Tax Problem

Obama’s Commerce Department nominee has some Romney-esque tax issues.

Oklahoma Tornado Reminds Us of the Value of Teachers

The Oklahoma tornado reminds us of all the roles teachers take on.

IRS, AP and James Rosen Scandals Strike at the First Amendment

The Obama scandals paint a picture of an administration at odds with the First Amendment.

Anthony Weiner Is Too Liberal to Be New York City Mayor

New York City doesn't need another Democratic mayor.

Organizations Masquerading as Tax-Exempt is the Real IRS Scandal

The real scandal at the IRS is electioneering groups getting tax-exempt status.

E.W. Jackson Proves the Tea Party Learned Nothing

By nominating E.W. Jackson, Virginia Republicans hope extremism will save them.

IRS, AP and Benghazi Are Not Obama Scandals

The word "scandal" doesn't appropriately describe anything going on in Washington these days.

advertisement